Not really convinced since BF4 had so many issues...Also cops and robbers in a Battlefield game? Trying to turn the streets full of civillians into a battlefield with A-10s and Little Birds wtf...

Battlefield hardline doesnt look really polished. Graphics looks really rough and gameplay animations looks stiff especially the holding of the M4 AR. Entire game also doesnt make sense to me TBH. Police using Scout Helis with miniguns wtf. If the robbers are so bloody rich with SUVs equipped with Miniguns why rob a bank lol, why not just rob a billionaire building...Sounds like they are just trying to cash in using the BF name. A BF game without tanks, jets (yes I know BC2 no jets) blahblah isnt really a BF game

Not a good first look for me. See how the beta feels if they give me beta code...Shoulda been a new IP

This post has been edited by devillightning1: Jun 10 2014, 05:33 PM

This is bad news TBH...since DICE is still busy fixing the bugs for BF4 and at the same time creating BF Hardline MP, imagine how many person at DICE are developing this game. And since you say BF5 may be released next year makes this sounds even worse. (Don't forget DICE are also developing Mirror's Edge 2 and Star Wars Battlefront, the amount of ppl developing this game will be spread really thin...entire team developing BF4 for 2 years already have so many bugs, spreading thin the entire team will be even worse.)

I doubt EA will throw all development to Visceral, seeing their DS2 mp

The hitreg on this game is rubbish for my first round...shoot ppl no hitreg at all. Its back to 10hz again. The beta also gives me the impression that this is a low budget BF4 DLC compared to BF4, the graphics at Ultra 1080p looks like crap, 32p only for both game modes, and the gun sounds are terrible...

This post has been edited by devillightning1: Jun 15 2014, 05:37 PM

Played few rounds and I dun wan to play liao...it feels like a low budget BF4 (worse gfx, worse optimization, smaller maps, lower player count etc...)

This post has been edited by devillightning1: Jun 16 2014, 10:08 PM

If u wan the full BF experience, get BF4/BF2

Witcher 3 is a different case for me

If this is a 20$ DLC pack like BC2 Vietnam, then sure, I think a lot of people will buy it since its quite fun for fooling around in a game without logic. But 60$? Bloody hell wtf, hell the game even looked worse IMO to BC2 Vietnam. That DLC have the feeling of being in the war with new tanks, weapons (AK-47, M16, FLAMETHROWER ANYONE??!!!), this felt like a rushed, low budget war on cartel (all looking sandy) and with reused weapons from previous games. Seriously WTF EA. Oh and please don't throw in Single Player as an excuse for $60, no one cares about SP in a Battlefield game. I am totally not buying into that "oh we have this idea xx years ago and started developing xx years ago". The effort on this game looks worse than BC2 Vietnam.

Hell, even Danny is also not buying into that lol

I hate the game...doesnt feel like BF at all. The shooting gameplay isnt as satisfying as BF4, the graphics look like CS, no destruction at all, I hate the in-game purchase system, shotgun for me is too damn powerful (20+ killstreak in bank job no problem), performance even tho looks worse than BF4 doesnt run much better than BF4 in SLI (didnt try single GPU).
This game feels like EA ran out of $$ for DICE to design tanks so they ask visceral to develop the game lol. Cops and robbers...police armed with m320 explosive rounds, helis armed with explosive miniguns, police brutality at its finest