
Copyright 2014 The Edge Communications Sdn. Bhd.
All Rights Reserved
The Edge Malaysia
May 12, 2014
Corporate: No resolution in sight for Plaza Rakyat
Kamarul Azhar
The arbitration between Plaza Rakyat Sdn Bhd (PRSB) and Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) is expected to be concluded in the next two months, according to sources.
The final submission proceeding of the two disputing parties over whether DBKL had the right to terminate the joint-venture agreement (JVA) and lease agreement on the Plaza Rakyat project in 2010 is expected to be done by the middle of this month.
However, sources say the conclusion of the arbitration may not end the decades-long fiasco. This is because PRSB is challenging, in the High Court of Malaya, the arbitration tribunalâ s interim award late last year that favours DBKL.
The proposed 15.3-acre integrated transport hub and commercial development in Jalan Pudu, Kuala Lumpur, has been abandoned for 17 years. PRSB was once its developer while DBKL was the original owner of the site.
â PRSB is contesting the interim decision at the High Court because it argues that the arbitrators have no jurisdiction, under the National Land Code 1965, to decide on matters concerning the lease agreement,â says a source.
The arbitrators, comprising Datuk Ghazi Ishak, Professor Tan Sri Visu Sinnadurai and Robert Lazar, had on Oct 24, 2013, found the termination of the JVA and lease agreement by DBKL valid.
However, PRSB argues that the forfeiture of the lease agreement is not arbitrable under the Land Code as the jurisdiction to grant any relief or order in such disputes is only within the purview of the High Court of Malaya.
PRSB said if the arbitrators were allowed to decide on matters concerning the lease, it will affect both the rights of PRSB and DBKL, as well as third parties, in particular the lenders. PRSB had charged the lease of the Plaza Rakyat land to secure loans from banks.
â The arbitration is between PRSB and DBKL, thus any decision made by the tribunal should not impede the rights of other parties, which cannot intervene in the proceedings. That is why PRSB is bringing the matter to the High Court so that the bankers can intervene,â says the source.
The banks had in February 2013 appointed AdamPrimus Chartered Accountants to be the receiver and manager of PRSB, effectively taking charge of the company previously controlled by Tan Sri Ting Pek Khiing.
While PRSB and DBKL lock horns over the JVA and lease agreement, buyers who had bought units in the development are losing their patience. For the past 17 years, they have tried to seek assistance from the authorities to resolve the deadlock.
â We would like to know what DBKL will do to help us. We have been waiting for almost 20 years for this project to be completed. How long more do we have to wait before the project is completed?â asks a frustrated buyer when met by The Edge recently.
While the Plaza Rakyat project is being left to rot in Jalan Pudu, other iconic developments are being planned for Kuala Lumpur. These include the 118-storey Warisan Merdeka tower, the Tun Razak Exchange and the redevelopment of Pudu Jail.
After it took charge of PRSB, AdamPrimus conducted an open tender in the middle of last year to invite suitable developers with sound finances to rehabilitate the project. It subsequently awarded the project to Ivory Properties Group Bhd in September 2013, with both parties entering an acquisition and rehabilitation agreement (ARA).
However, the ARA between PRSB and Ivory Properties is not recognised by DBKL. City Hall maintains that since it had terminated the JVA with PRSB earlier, any agreement entered into by PRSB or parties acting on its behalf is rendered invalid.
According to a source close to AdamPrimus, DBKL did not even respond to a letter informing it about the ARA signed by AdamPrimus and Ivory Properties. Communications between DBKL and AdamPrimus seem to have deteriorated.
â How can the receiver know what DBKL wants, whether or not it agrees with the ARA, if it did not respond to the letter? The contract with Ivory Properties will ensure that all parties are taken care of,â says the source.
According to the ARA, Ivory Properties will pay RM560 million to DBKL for the project. At the same time, Ivory Properties will settle all outstanding quit rent to DBKL, while PRSB will be paid RM400 million, which will go towards settling its debts with the banks and other parties.
Observers opine that the agreement is not palatable for DBKL because it will only get a maximum share of 7% of the gross development value of the project, limited to RM560 million. This translates into RM844 psf, while real estate valuers put the value of the land at between RM1,000 and RM1,200 psf.
According to a court document seen by The Edge in regard to the arbitration proceeding, DBKL is demanding an additional payment of RM265 million for the revaluation of the project land, and payment of a minimum 20% guaranteed profit from PRSB.
However, DBKLâ s decision not to speak to the media and interested parties is not helping the parties involved to find a win-win situation all around. A DBKL spokesman says, due to the ongoing arbitration, City Hall could not issue any statement or comments to the media.
â Iâ m so sorry to inform you that DBKL canâ t answer the questions you have posted. The reason is that this case is still in arbitration. We will know more details once the process is over,â says DBKL media relations officer Md Aznan Md Zain.
Ivory Properties group CEO Datuk Low Eng Hock says the group has asked to meet with DBKL to discuss the ARA in detail but has yet to receive any confirmation to date.
â We are still waiting for a response from DBKL,â Low says in response to an email from The Edge. The Penang-based property developer has plans to work with PR1MA Corp Malaysia to come up with an affordable housing proposal for Plaza Rakyat.
â We aim to provide more affordable homes for the people and we hope DBKL is receptive to the proposal,â Low states in his email. If it is given the right to develop Plaza Rakyat, it would be Ivory Propertiesâ first major project in the Klang Valley.
The Plaza Rakyat project â " first mooted by Datuk Hamzah Abdul Majeed and his wife Datin Freida Pilus in the early 1990s, and subsequently taken over by Tingâ s now defunct Wembley Industries Holdings Bhd â " has been postponed indefinitely since construction was halted during the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis.
The project would have been a multi-modal transport hub amidst an integrated property development, probably the first of its kind in Kuala Lumpur at the time before the completion of KL Sentral in the early 2000s.
â At the moment, nobody knows what exactly DBKL wants. Even if it does not agree with the terms of the agreement with Ivory Properties, it should at least make it known to the receiver so that something can be worked out,â says the source close to AdamPrimus.
May 14, 2014
This post has been edited by bb68: May 29 2014, 12:50 PM
May 28 2014, 05:46 PM, updated 2y ago
Quote

0.0280sec
0.64
6 queries
GZIP Disabled