CG input.
1. it has a much conventional layout with wet kitchen at rear.
2. the 2nd balcony on first floor may distort the facade
3. one of the room on first floor has no attached toilet
4. family hall on first floor has balcony...good natural lighting and vent
5. No SPAH
6. MBR layout look much spacious but no walk-in wardrobe effect
7. Entrance has nice provision for shoe racks
8. staircase is quite normal but save space.
EM 40x80
1. non conventional layout - wet kitchen by the side in front with utility room and door for direct access from car porch (some said cn bring grocery in)
2. dining hall is located at rear side....facing the patio or green
3. all first room rooms have attached toilets
4. family hall on first floor doesnt have direct sunlight but via the staricase and tall window....and no balcony at this area
5. Double volume effect from the staircase. It does take up more space.
6. SPAH
7. MBR has walk-in wardrobe...making the MBR looks smaller
8. MBR balcony is wider than CG...(I think back in Ecosky, their balcony is at least 5 feet width).
9. Gateless concept...except the greenwith some metal grille and small length of wall. (i think i shown this pix at cluster discussion)...should be similar.
I cant compare the external facade but I can say 40x80 EM facade is top notch...Which part...The side is the best part IMHO with several lines of elongate glass panel (of different length) and pretty much aligned with the stair profile.....
I have yet to look at FH or LH, developer devlierable and exprience, strata title or ind title, overall township planning, what is ummph factor, any other USPs,
Thanks bro for the detailed ecplanations! There are actually 2 designs for the EM smd (be it 40x80 or 40x90) - classic and lifestyle. The lifestyle type is the "modern" type whereby the yard and guest room are at the front and the wet kitchen is just right behind the guest room whereas the dinning is at the back. The layout for master bedroom is also a bit "weird" (to my standard). As for the classic type, which is the more common one, the bathroom in the master bedroom is facing /beside the bed - quite a weird design. In general, the master bedroom for both types are not spacious enough. I'm also concern whether there is enough sunlight getting in the 1st floor family hall.
As for CG, I would say the master bedroom is more spacious though the family hall at 1st floor is smaller due to space being sacrificed for 4 bedrooms. But the kitchen area (particularly wet kitchen) is smaller.
Facade I tend to prefer CG (pls see pic).
Nevertheless, valuation wise I believe that EM has greater upside potential partly attributed by the fact that together with SPS Ecohill the vicinity is expected to be a well planned, high grade townships. Of course the fact that Tan Sri LKS being the mastermind for these projects (EM and Ecohill) also carry some intangible values which we can't ignore. CG lacks of other sizeable high end projects (by other developers) which could uphold the values of the properties there which shall take into consideration of the facilities and infrastructure in the surrounding area. Accessibility is one key issue. Publicity of this CG project seems not done so well too compared to EM. Perhaps because of publicity, people tend to have much confidence in EM. Also, a friend of mind raise a valid point that Klang people rarely stay in service apartment - so how well will the high rise (on top of the KSL Mall 2) in CG be selling? Saleability of the high rise units will be one of the critical success factors of CG township.
Sigh... how to choose???