QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Aug 1 2014, 11:21 PM)
Low observability. But nothing like the Zumwalt class.
Military Thread V12, 31/8 Merdeka; 16/9 Malaysia Day
Military Thread V12, 31/8 Merdeka; 16/9 Malaysia Day
|
|
Aug 1 2014, 11:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 7 2014, 09:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 7 2014, 12:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Green beret
![]() |
|
|
Aug 14 2014, 08:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(bereev @ Aug 14 2014, 08:04 AM) see how ppl do rehearsal at night no need cause road closure and traffic jam, are we also do rehearsal at night ? In real war, some road will be close to civilian traffic. Do you know that Interstate highway system was originally a military project? In wartime, a civilian vehicles will move away from the front line. This will slow down the military convoy that heading toward the front line. So it's important that some road be close to the civiian to ease the movement of a military vehicles.lets see next week the merdeka parade rehearsal |
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 20 2014, 12:21 PM) We could've build similar facility. In fact we can easily build a mockup city for urban warfare training since we have the land to do so. Why our military planners still stuck with battle in a kampung and palm oil plantation is anyone guess. |
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 02:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(lulz @ Aug 20 2014, 02:29 PM) Yes, i posted some source above, maybe not a specialized one but still counts? and pdrm also got that brand new urban cqb centre, army can borrow right? CQB is easy since it's a small team action. The difficult one is for combine arms urban training, infantry + armor + close air support. |
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 06:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Aug 20 2014, 02:53 PM) Aster 15 or aster 30 would need an overhaul in radar system not just the vls We do have a need for a TAS equipped ASW platform to complement our subs. Area Air Defense is less pressing since we can depend on land base fighters to provide AD coverage.Seeing the type 45 and formidable class, that what is needed. I think the navy also highlighted its need for area defense instead of point defense. Then again is must be like the centrak government say NO, go for cheaper one No offence, but based on the configuration, our lcs is like a big dog with small tooths. It can bite but not hard enough. I hope this project didn't become like NGPV. I remember we planned 27 hulls of various configurations. Now it's just an expensive gunboat. |
|
|
Aug 25 2014, 07:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Aug 25 2014, 09:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Some joke about F-35
![]() |
|
|
Aug 26 2014, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(junchuan @ Aug 26 2014, 03:40 PM) Just read wikipedia abt the spanish aircraft carrier principe de asturias and was wondering what wud happen if we get it in like 2021. Lets say(highly unlikely) that najib raises the defence budget to 2.5% gdp, would it be a good idea to form a carrier battle group with gowinds, subs, the carrier with f35s and upgraded kedahs?? Btw im not saying theres a chance this will happen, juz trying to feed my fantasy Better get LHD than Principe de Asturias. LHD is more suitable for us. |
|
|
Aug 27 2014, 11:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Want to ask. Is it possible to rent a military equipments from other country for a short duration, say, 2-3 month?
|
|
|
Aug 27 2014, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Aug 27 2014, 11:33 AM) Attack helicopter for example. Let say the sulu initiated a large scale incursion into Sabah. In order to better fight the incursion, we need attack helicopter whch we dont currently have. So we go to Singapore and rent say 5 AH-64 Apache. To maintain their Military secret, we will also take along their pilots and ground crew. We will have strategic command of course, but the units will have freedom on tactical level. |
|
|
Aug 27 2014, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(xtemujin @ Aug 27 2014, 05:13 PM) Chinese military develops new anti-tank missile Technology transfer from Israel?By PTI | 26 August 2014 Tuesday | 02.51PM IST BEIJING: Chinese military has developed an anti-tank missile which could hit targets at four km range matching that of the similar new state of the art-weapon being marketed by the US and Russia. The People's Liberation Army (PLA) ground force will have another new state-of-the-art weapon in its arsenal-the HJ-12 anti-tank missile, which can destroy tanks at a distance of more than 4 km, state-run China Daily reported today. The missile developed by China North Industries Group Corp, one of the major defence contractors, will enable the PLA to catch up with the anti-tank combat capability of its Western and Russian counterparts and help it gain a bigger share in the international military equipment market. "The HJ-12 is much more advanced than the anti-tank missiles currently used by the PLA ground force. It has a host of cutting-edge technologies that have been adopted by its most powerful counterparts in Western armies," the Daily quoted a military expert as saying. "Besides the PLA, I think its potential buyers will be militaries from developing countries that have to deal with third-generation tanks. But considering its possibly high price, the number of buyers will be small," he said. Globally, the market for portable, anti-tank missiles is dominated by Western and Russian products, such as the United States' FGM-148 Javelin and Russia's AT-13 Saxhorn-2. The lack of a portable antitank missile has compromised the PLA's ability to attack enemy tanks and hindered efforts to modernize the arsenal for its infantry. Jane's Defence Weekly reported that the HJ-12 features fire-and-forget capability and automatic self-guidance instruments, and it can be fired within buildings and bunkers due to its soft launch system. The fire-and-forget technology, which does not require further guidance after launch, such as illumination of the target or wire guidance, is an important property for a guided weapon to have, since a person or vehicle that lingers near the target to guide the missile is vulnerable to attack and unable to carry out other tasks, the Daily report said. "The technology will help reduce the number of anti-tank missile operators deployed at a single battlefield, lowering probable casualties," said Li Xiaojian, editor at one of the biggest military forums in China. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/i...ow/40914925.cms |
|
|
Aug 27 2014, 05:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0885sec
0.94
8 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 09:47 AM |