QUOTE(LTZ @ Aug 15 2014, 10:59 PM)
This is 2A uniform...... so u can see where is the name tag (right side above pocket) & medal ribbon (left side)

yang pakai double breasted coat tu uniform navy gak ke?
aku igt submariner je ada coat macam tu
Military Thread V12, 31/8 Merdeka; 16/9 Malaysia Day
|
|
Aug 15 2014, 11:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 16 2014, 03:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Aug 16 2014, 12:59 PM) boring ship lah, VL-Mica 20km SAM boleh defense apa ..... helicopter attach Anti-Ship missile datang pun tak boleh buat apa-apa..... SAM Mica tu lebih tuk intercept incoming missileaku tak rasa final weapon spec dah habis umum, kapal tu besar dan persenjataan aku tak rasa setakat tu QUOTE(Bombgen @ Aug 16 2014, 01:05 PM) Dah tu apa guna undang2 bangorang nak pakai uniform tu mati2 gi operasi nak dapat ribbon dia sedap2 pakai ingat aaa impersonating a military officer is a crime QUOTE(junchuan @ Aug 16 2014, 03:07 PM) but u see wreck point is located right beside the island so maybe its possible to enlarge the island without damaging the reefs?? plus, the diving sites all seem to be on the perimeter of the reef so maybe we can build on the inside?? There is already a navy base there+ the reef is good as it is, a very popular among divers and at peak season it is hard to get a reservation |
|
|
Aug 16 2014, 03:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Aug 16 2014, 03:39 PM) kenot kadet bersatu pun kene lanyak kaw kaw, ini kan la pulak kalo askar regularit's against the law to wear military fatigue similar to what our military wear if you're not part of the military and askar2 agak pantang tengok orang awam saja2 pakai uniform tentera, apatah lagi sekali dengan medals.. paham2 je la..bukan mudah nak dapatkan uniform dan medals tu..diorang rasa terhina tengok orang awam saja2 main dengan uniform2 nih.. mau tak panas. kerja teruk masuk operasi nak pakai ribbon, tu belum masuk kes service ribbon ngan recommendation kene sailang kat mindef tetiba bebudak awam plak pakai lagi banyak |
|
|
Aug 18 2014, 04:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 18 2014, 03:43 PM) I was wondering what are the status of the PCU Gagah Samudera & Teguh Samudera? When are the 2 ships to be commissioned? It's been a whiile since news of NGV Tech financial trouble. It is not financial problem due to no money but a much more complicated then thatthe last time I head that Bousted will took over these 2 ship |
|
|
Aug 19 2014, 12:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2014, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2014, 04:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#107
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2014, 06:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#108
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
APMM Serah Lima Kapal Untuk Dijadikan Tukun Tiruan
KUALA TERENGGANU, 19 Ogos (Bernama) -- Lima kapal ronda Kelas Sipadan milik Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia (APMM) diserahkan kepada Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia untuk dijadikan tukun tiruan di pulau-pulau terpilih di negara ini. Timbalan Ketua Pengarah Operasi APMM, Laksamana Madya Datuk Ahmad Puzi Ab Kahar berkata lima kapal terbabit ialah KM Siamil, KM Sempadi, KM Bidong, KM Jarak dan KM Ligitan yang bakal ditenggelamkan di Pulau Perhentian dan Pulau Redang, di Terengganu, Pulau Payar, Langkawi dan Mersing, Johor. Katanya kesemua kapal berkenaan sebelum ini telah digunakan Tentera Laut Diraja Malaysia (TLDM) sebelum diserahkan kepada APMM pada 2005 untuk tugas penguatkuasaan. "Secara keseluruhannya kapal ronda itu telah berada di lautan selama 46 tahun sebelum diserahkan kepada Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia untuk dijadikan tukun tiruan dan kesemua kapal tersebut juga sudah tamat tempoh khidmatnya. Justeru kita serahkan kapal ini kepada Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia untuk dimanfaatkan kepada masyarakat khususnya para nelayan tempatan untuk dijadikan tukun tiruan,"katanya selepas majlis penyerahan lima kapal itu kepada Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia di Pejabat APMM Daerah Maritim Kuala Terengganu di sini, hari ini. Ahmad Puzi berkata projek kerjasama APMM dengan Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia dan Kementerian Pelancongan dan Kebudayaan itu banyak memberi manfaatnya kepada penduduk tempatan pulau, operator pelancongan dan penyelam scuba. Beliau berkata langkah yang dilakukan ini juga dapat membantu meningkatkan pendapatan nelayan kerana kapal ini akan berubah menjadi suatu habitat yang sesuai untuk perlindungan, pembiakan dan tempat mencari makanan kepada sebahagian besar spesis ikan dan habitat di laut. Dalam pada itu Timbalan Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia Kamarruddin Ibrahim berkata sebelum ini pihaknya telah menerima dua buah kapal APMM untuk dijadikan tukun tiruan di Pulau Tioman, Pahang dan Labuan. Katanya dengan wujudnya lebih banyak tukun tiruan di dasar laut ia juga dapat menarik pelancong terutama penyelam yang melakukan aktiviti selam scuba di kapal karam di taman laut di negara ini. "Sebagai contoh, kapal APMM yang dijadikan tukun tiruan kini menjadi tarikan baru di Taman Laut Pulau Tioman apabila berjaya menarik kedatangan pelancong seramai 7,200 orang tahun lalu," katanya. --BERNAMA mengamuk la bebudak Polis Marin sah2 kapal yang kene jadi tukun tu klas PX Polis Marine tak pakai tp bila polis marin mintak balik tak nak bagi |
|
|
Aug 19 2014, 10:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#109
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
SAM dan SSM dah finalized
tak dapek gak Aster This post has been edited by atreyuangel: Aug 19 2014, 10:23 PM |
|
|
Aug 19 2014, 10:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#110
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(junchuan @ Aug 19 2014, 06:35 PM) Nice workI think the preceed by Kedah class can be remove and change to Rahmat Class F24 |
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 11:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#111
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#112
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 20 2014, 11:43 AM) According to Marhalim in his blog unlike the RSN Formidable Class with a tonnage of around 4400++ tonnes the RMN LCS Gowind with a tonnage of 2500++ tonnes is to small to accomodate the Aster. that is why I am sadhttp://www.malaysiandefence.com/?p=4705 it is about 3000 tonnes ++ now |
|
|
Aug 21 2014, 02:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#113
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 21 2014, 04:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#114
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Aug 21 2014, 04:09 PM) US police going overboard? heard about militarizing the police in Anderson CooperUnless that brotha is going to suddenly sling out an AK-47 out of that bag,this is totally ridiculous. Welcome to the police state of USA. there is a very vocal protest about militarizing the police plus there is a clause that says all the equipment given must be used within one year or the equipment will be taken back from the county office |
|
|
Aug 23 2014, 08:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#115
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 24 2014, 02:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#116
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(thpace @ Aug 24 2014, 12:15 AM) not sure, i asked the same question as well but it seem the air force is mainly interested in twin engine and and best two sit variant well buk was never in ATM plan anywaydog fight? Most likely they will send the mkm and mig up instead of f18, better equid for the task on hand anyway, with Malaysia wanting a mid range SAM, i am sure most our immediate neighbours will have their eyes blinking once it purchased sadly after the mh17 incident, chances of buk being selected sure going down the drain only Starstreak with Pantsir as small dome protection SLAMRAAM for medium dome protection while the S300/S400 for the rest opss me thinks me talk too much but meh if only the gomen is serious to pour money like they used to kesian TUDM |
|
|
Aug 24 2014, 02:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#117
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Aug 24 2014, 03:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#118
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Aug 24 2014, 03:06 AM) Boleh ke nak letak vamtac tak berat and tak oversize ke? Meh, I was being funny laar Senang nak terbalik. US pun takat letak stinger je kat hummwv mereka. Kalau letak kat adnan mayb masih boleh. QUOTE(thpace @ Aug 24 2014, 03:07 AM) SLAMRAAM? are you sure? that why I said I maybe talked a little muchI was told that it was like mentioned once during meeting then no news after that because other cheaper and equally range system like for example the buk are considered. pantsir again i also heard for point defense purpose but no news after that They say they try to opt for russian or europe even maybe china based system first before american from past news, i can see why s300/s400 got news said offered to us but again seeing our budget no point having one battalion, should have a few then can consider nation wide air defence the Pantsir deal at one time look a little to certain macam dah nak kompom dah until the sound of cricket QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Aug 24 2014, 03:13 AM) I tot slaamraam is a bust, no future prospect, no production line, the thing is not even complete when the budget is cut? the article was in 2011 right?[Air Defense: SLAMRAAM Dies From Loneliness] heh it was wayy before that, it was in the plan before the retirement of the starburst maybe the US are that desperate at that time kot |
|
|
Aug 25 2014, 05:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#119
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Aug 25 2014, 02:56 PM) I tot the contract for SGPV also included money to upgrade the BHS shipyard. So, why should we buy foreign ships when BHS will eventually capable of doing so? Purchase for more surface ships aint coming in near future anyway.. BHS upgrade depa punya yard is because they want to able to produce 2 frigate ship at onceour neighbours buy new ships and weaponry, kita meleleh je tengok..takper, janji handbag baru akak tu leh beli.. QUOTE(thpace @ Aug 25 2014, 03:49 PM) that mean it highly unlikely we will get new class of ship until tis 27 order is fulfil different projectgoodbye mini dokdo Mini dokdo will on like a jiffy as long as there is a budget to begin with QUOTE(yinchet @ Aug 25 2014, 04:10 PM) Bhs enough money to take over ngvtech? actually the real reason why ngvtech could not complete the ship is not financiallyTheir financial are pretty tied up with sgpv. I dun think they want to get their hand into the mess. Also I think the tldm might not be very keen boustead having their hand ngvtech after some unpleasant thing happen in sgpv issue. but another problem altogether, so I do believe that the NGVtech is more like handed the project to BHS rather then BHS take over the problem with NGVtech is quite complicated and no not financial problem QUOTE(trouble_chegu @ Aug 25 2014, 04:37 PM) Labuan shipyard? Asyik tkar ceo ja 2 mintak2 direktor baru nih jalan la Labuan SHY tuBalik2 tkar coz songlap duit projek Tarak buleh pakai punya shipyard aku ngna yinchet tau itu orang |
|
|
Aug 25 2014, 08:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#120
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Aug 25 2014, 05:42 PM) I see. wait til I pm youbhs really try to take over. Btw atreyu what really happen to ngv tech? As at now I only heard financial problem and possible some dispute on going. but financial is not the real problem they have a strong financial background that's why they get the job at the first place things done there in a clockwork until the problem arise QUOTE(yinchet @ Aug 25 2014, 05:45 PM) Yg screw up itu psc. ada kat tanah arabBoss pondan tu entah dah lari ke mana. mayb dah kena black ops kot. Ngvtech lain punya company. |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0798sec
0.24
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 08:37 PM |