I will not get 48", it is less than idea ppi and too big.

I predict 32" will be around 6.5k++

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Nov 22 2022, 04:25 PM

You can claim if following either condition meet:

• 2 bright sub-pixel
• 5 dark sub-pixel
• combination of 5 sub-pixel (example 1 bright + 4 dark is still claimable even though your bright sub pixel is less than 2.)

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Nov 27 2022, 01:03 AM

If not for HDR. Any well known brand within your budget IPS panel is OK.

If required HDR, then need spend a sum of money.

And what is your budget.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Nov 28 2022, 04:27 PM

You mean this https://www.dell.com/en-my/shop/dell-27-4k-...tor-accessories

From rtings.com review, this is a great monitor for productivity, the only cons is you may need to adjust the colour as it out of the box no so accurate in colour.

https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/dell/s2722qc

For not gaming, this is a great value great 4K monitor.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Nov 29 2022, 02:31 AM

HDR10 is based, every HDR display is support HDR10 and Windows only support HDR10 basically.

HDR is another lever of visual appealing but you need to spend a lot to experience it.

• HDR 400 - most the time it is worst than SDR.
• HDR 600 - minimum requirement to taste HDR.
• HDR 1000 with 1000+ local dimming Mini-LED - optimal HDR experience.
• OLED or QD-OLED also is optimal HDR experience.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Nov 30 2022, 07:30 PM

To me yes, it is another visual level. I can't tell using word, you need to experience yourself.

But don't using HDR400 display as that is giving bad experience than normal SDR.

29" Ultrawide is 24" Wide, for 1080p look ok.

LCD only looks good on native resolution, it will be blur and pixelate if you not running at native resolution, which means if it is 1440p then it only look ok in 1440p and you should only run at 1440p.

29" Ultrawide is actually 24" Wide longer screen. I not recommended this as 2560x1080 did not increase much of productivity screen area and it looks a bit narrow and clouded.

34" Ultrawide is 27" Wide longer screen. Recommended resolution of 3440x1440 and this increase a lot of productivity screen area and look just nice.

49" Super Ultrawide is 2 units of 27" Wide combine together side by side. Also recommended resolution of 5120x1440. This resolution is closed to 4K pixel and you need to have at least RTX 3080 or equivalent GPU for proper render the games in range of 60fps ~ 120fps only.

For 4K actually did not increase much on movies but for 3D gaming is another story and wow effect is there. For movies wise the thing shine here is HDR but HDR is another topic and for a proper HDR output display is still expensive, without RM 5k and above, don't think about it. A proper HDR output minimum requirement is HDR600 and best is HDR1000 or above with mini-LED 1000+ local dimming or OLED/QD-OLED. Those HDR400 is too basic and cannot proper handling HDR and most of the time it will appear worst than SDR.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 5 2022, 12:05 AM

For 1440p go for 27" Wide or 34" Ultrawide.
32" Wide should go for 4K.

Because 32" is much bigger than 27".

34" is same screen size as 27" but longer only, so the requirement of PPI won't change as it is same screen size in height.

eddie2020
You may check this out for best Ultrawide Monitor- https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/best...tures/ultrawide

• Super Ultrawide - Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 (G9 Neo) - I using this. 😊
• OLED Ultrawide - Dell Alienware AW3423DW
• IPS Ultrawide - LG 34GP950G-B
• Mid Range Ultrawide - Gigabyte M34WQ
• Budget Ultrawide - AOC CU34G2X

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 6 2022, 08:42 AM

Yup LG is RM 4.8k and that Gigabyte is flat. AOC seems not bring in this model to Malaysia.

The Acer XZ342CUP not many review but it is RM 1.6k and in this range normally will have serious black smearing and ghosting issue for VA panel. Beware on this.

I got not much recommended on RM 2k range as normally it will have black smearing issue if the panel is VA, and great VA or IPS is over your budget.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 7 2022, 01:35 AM

Samsung Odyssey G8 Neo and G7 Neo.

Opps. Didn't notice you mentioned 1440p. 😜

But for 1440p, it is recommended for 27" only.
For this, you can check out LG 27GP850.

32" better go for 2160p even though you can live with 1080p at 27"

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 7 2022, 10:55 PM

Nope. They is no release or annoucement of 27GQ850 yet. So far the only Q series are 32GQ850.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 7 2022, 11:12 PM

You may check out Gigabyte M27Q X (240hz) or M27Q P (170hz).

Your may check out AOC 24G2Z (240hz).

Tomorrow I may go check out Illegear Apex 25. Haha!

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 9 2022, 10:49 PM

This two is around RM 800 if also over budget. Very sorry nothing to recommended.

Any monitor below this range is bad and not to recommended.

Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 is better and recommended.

Great review from Rtings.com and YouTube channel Hardware Unboxed.

Both is 27" and 1080p which is not recommended for 27" size as everything look too big, narrow working space and not clear text due to very low 82 PPI.
For best clarity, PPI should be 100 and above.

Suggest look for 1440p for 27". 1080p should stop at 24".

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 10 2022, 10:41 PM

For 27" 1440p, you need to increase your budget, impossible it is same cost as 1080p.

Below is some best 27" 1440p monitor

• Gigabyte M27Q - https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/gigabyte/m27q (if not wrong M27Q P is newer replacement model)
• Gigabyte M27Q X - https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/gigabyte/m27q-x
• Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/acer...272u-kvbmiiprzx
• LG 27GP850-B https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/lg/27gp850-b

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 11 2022, 11:08 AM