The lion share of the good units are for themselves, so much so for their claim as said by some in lyn that they want to "reward keen purchasers." This is a mild corporate malfeasance (lawyers, don't shoot me ). Malaysia boleh, as this is already the best we could ever get.

This post has been edited by Ma6: May 26 2014, 11:48 AM

@tengster's sense of humor is quite distinctive.

I have higher expectation on the best developer by far on corporate responsibility. Yes, no cherry picking as they like is great, and it's probably the highest standard possible in Bolehland for this lifetime of mine.

If we connect the dots, we could form a loop of staff units, lacing through the best blocks for each of these three types. Take 22x70 for example and counting each half row as one block, then there are 6 blocks for themselves, and 5 out 6 are the best blocks for this type. Well, to me, such skewed treatment is a far cry on wanting to reward keen buyers or property aficionadoes like yourself.

Sure, some people would get very nice units; but my thought here is about distribution.

This post has been edited by Ma6: May 26 2014, 09:24 PM

@tengster:

 Table_1.pdf ( 31.15k ) Number of downloads: 197

The table shows the distribution of good units for 22x70.

The conclusion is crystal clear, beyond subjectivity of what are the good units. They clearly reward themselves, and they DID NOT reward buyers.

This post has been edited by Ma6: May 28 2014, 01:19 PM

See
 Table_1_annotated.pdf ( 33.31k ) Number of downloads: 235