Anyone know Litz in johor for buying proposal / wedding band?
Thanks.

Already bought one there.
Comparatively, the price is cheaper than love and co. and some other jewelry shops in johor area.
0.35c,
F Color grade,
SI 1 clarity grade,
with ICI cert, ideal cut.

Cost about RM 5k.

Not sure whether it is a good buy or not.. But not too bad for me i guess.
I think 5k at Love and Co. only able to get wedding bands without solitaire diamond.
So that's how i decided to go with Litz.

I think a previous few post i seen a slightly better deal compare to mine.

Just recently bought a diamond ring with 18k white gold setting. Price ~10k. IGI.

0.65 C, D Color, VS1, Super Ideal Cut.

HCA: 1.1

Take note that this is a lab diamond.

What do you guys think?

ASET/Idealscope pictures of it will be uploaded upon request. Quite lazy to copy from email. Haha...

Hi everyone, truly appreciate if you could give some comments onto the diamond below.
RM 4,634 with below specification (without casing). By the way, what is the current market price for casing?

3x excellent
0.4 c
F
VVS1

Ehh, just came across to this tool and mine was 97.2 only leh

Already got gemologist to verify the diamond including the inclusions in the diamond.

Although it's needle inclusion, couldn't find it under x40 magnification

The gemologist I met was working in Michael Trio so he told me that his profession.

Yeap, now the gemologist is drawing the 3D model for me then can decide on the setting already

Hi, i have gotten the H&A image from audreys..is that okay? Any comment?

Thanks alot..

Hi, i have gotten the H&A image from audreys..is that okay? Any comment?

Thanks alot..

That's a very thorough analysis and I agree with most of it. Let's make some minor tweaks. Feel free to use any or all of this on your site.

The little arrowheads that appear in the middle of the hearts pattern are always going to be erratic in structure, don't pay those any attention, none at all.

The images provided for hearts and arrows by this particular supplier are not really photographs, but rather computer generated renderings, probably generated using Sarine Computerized proportions analysis. But they can tell us a bit about the optical precision, which is not up to my standards for "Hearts and Arrows". Let's analyze the image:



​The green arrows pointing to obstruction under the table facet at the base of the arrows is going to be most evident to most people without a lot of diamond evaluation experience. This obstruction will face-up black from the top down view of a clarity photograph. It is created by differences in the space around each of the hearts, which is indicated here using the color pink.

You'll notice that the varying degrees of obstruction affect the visible amount of (what should be) translucent space under the table facet. Thus the relative space within each of the triangular patterns that appear between the arrow shafts is different. This will play havoc with the manner in which light reflects throughout the diamond, it will not be evenly dispersed. You can see a difference in the depth of the red space that borders the eight sides of the table facet outline being affected by the volume of obstruction. Note that all diamonds will exhibit some degree of obstruction, but the idea is to minimize it.

Note that the larger amount of space around one of the hearts is creating the small amount of light leakage visible as black in the relative one o'clock region of the table facet.

The light blue circles indicate where the tips of the hearts appear to be twisting or bending. In reality, they are not twisting, nor bending. This is an optical illusion created by the light reflections coming off the pavilion main facets from the other side of the diamond, being different in length. See graphic this page - which I'm now reminded is more of a draft which needs to be finished.

The majority of these optical precision issues are being created by differences in the size, length and the indexing of the lower girdle facets, but it is also accentuated by the proportions of the diamond. The crown and pavilion angle measurements are only the beginning of the diamond selection process, the crown and depth measurements must also be taken into account, but these factors are more of a puzzle comprised of sliding pieces - which is why I've never attempted to write a tutorial on it, it would simply be too confusing and would likely create a logistical nightmare for the consumer.

But I can tell you that the pavilion depth of 43.5% happens to be the "critical tipping point" where light begins NOT to strike fully off the pavilion facets. Thus the full volume of light is not likely to be reflected back up from the pavilion facets (lower half of the diamond) the person observing the diamond. This is one of the reasons why Enchanted Diamonds is giving this 0.40 carat, F-color, VVS-1 clarity, GIA Excellent cut round diamond an overall cut score of 94.1% out of a possible 100%.

The shallower crown angle of 33 degrees is also a factor and is likely to produce more brilliance (white sparkle) as opposed to producing a virtual balance of brilliance and dispersion (colored sparkle) as would be likely to occur with a crown angle between 34.3 - 35.0 degrees. This effect is likely to be increased by the 80% lower girdle facet length, which is likely to produce sparkle which is smaller in size.

Due to the way our human eyes interpret sparkle that is smaller in size, it is not likely to be fully dispersed into colored sparkle. Note that the GIA rounds off the lower girdle facet length to the nearest half a percent, so the diamond might produce sparkle that is larger in size if the lower girdle facets are actually 78% which the GIA would round up to 80% and this can be visually estimated by an experienced diamond grader using the clarity photograph.

I'm definitely not a fan of lab grown diamonds, feel free to link to this article and borrow some graphics if you want (with credit of origin please, maintains validity of license). I realize that in your case this statement is kind of redundant since you seem to be very good about that already... Thank you for that.

Refer to the article Diamond Color Grading for additional insight on blue fluorescence and a really cool video. I've never seen a diamond with medium blue fluorescence that presented any negative visual properties, it can only help in my opinion. The realm of strong blue is also usually a safe bet. There is the potential for diamonds to appear "over blue" which people tend to interpret as being milky or cloudy, in the realm of very strong to distinct blue - this is where the 2% of gem quality diamonds come in, which exhibit visual properties negatively influenced by the extremely high volume of blue fluorescence. Always advise your clients to avoid diamonds exhibiting white or yellow fluorescence, that is always going to negatively influence the visual properties.

It's super cool to see you taking such an interest in diamonds :-)

What would be the estimate cost for:
Carat - 0.3 to 0.4
Clarity - VS2, SI1
Colour - H, I, J
Cut - Excellent

And have anyone out there proposed before with other than diamonds - e.g. Ruby, Sapphire, Emerald etc? 

Wow thanks! I love the recommendation of Tailored Jewel and Eumayco. Something not so 'commercialized' brand.
Audrey's ring itself costs at least RM2100? Didn't expect that as noob in these things.
I'm looking at the most basic setting, no need fancy-schmancy just a proposal from the heart 
Budget around RM3K (diamond+ring). Feasible? Sorry didn't really know the price in market.
Just putting my criteria, I'm not surveying anywhere thus asking for recommendation

G 0.34c VS2 = RM4100, worth of money?

hi bro..

just went there to check

here is the info

0.34crt H SI2 Triple Excellent N with casing = RM4100

and

0.25 carat E VS2 Triple Excellent = RM3300

(which is worth penny?) sorry a noob here..
kambingkoh

Purely based on the 4Cs, I dont think the 0.34c is a good deal. 

For the 0.25c, does it include ring?

Can't you get them to text you the GIA number?

they told me but i couldnt remember...too many numbers with 7 1 9 0000.

its euyo and tailor

thanks bro

how bout this....LAST to ask from me

0.34crt H SI2 Triple Excellent N with side diamond casing = RM4100

and

0.25 carat E VS2 Triple Excellent with side diamond casing= RM3800
please advise..after this, promise no more noob question

Once a female perhaps?? Now balik ke pangkal jalan......lolz....joking

Ok. Heading for 0.25c. I am thinking some jewel tht comes from a non commercialize shop like wah chan bro..keke..now 2 option given......1. Side diamonds(1 short line of diamonds straight to left n right). 2 halo diamonds (small diamonds surrounds the middle diamond)

Just worry w8ll the small diamond looks weird when it fits into it

Or perhaps just take the promo set rm3300 with the normal classic casing

Budget below 4k....not too small the diamond, sparkling fire and price with casing. Thta all only

thanks bro.

tailored dont keep any inventories, its much towards the ecommerce selling, wherelse eumayco keep stocks where you can view it before actual purchase.

i am still in the mid of thinkgin which to choose now.... but since some of you recommended me for the 0.25 which is more worth penny.