Dec 27 2023, 01:10 PM
QUOTE(Aldo-Kirosu @ Dec 16 2023, 04:28 PM)
This project want to following China Shen zhen (a bridge to hongkong city) as development model.
But she zhen and hongkong is under China so their development policy is fair for 1 country policy. But Malaysia and Singapore is both different country plus, johor is mostly like focusing in light or heavy manufacturing that required cheaper labours and huge space for logistics and store purposed, but all those high end technology, chips, medicine, and etc etc production required small space (most profitable manufacturer is still located at Singapore).
So forest city have chance to be well develop, but don't expecting like shen zhen city hongkong or singapore.
everyone fail to realize 1 thing. Singapore will never want the checkpoint crossing to be as smooth as you hope. But she zhen and hongkong is under China so their development policy is fair for 1 country policy. But Malaysia and Singapore is both different country plus, johor is mostly like focusing in light or heavy manufacturing that required cheaper labours and huge space for logistics and store purposed, but all those high end technology, chips, medicine, and etc etc production required small space (most profitable manufacturer is still located at Singapore).
So forest city have chance to be well develop, but don't expecting like shen zhen city hongkong or singapore.
That will crashes their local domestic consumption and property market. its Malaysia that wanted the traffic jam to be ease so people will bring money into Johor.
1 of the condition Singapore agrees to the RTS project is to give back the woodlands train station land so they have space to develop.
Quote
0.0274sec
1.06
7 queries
GZIP Disabled