QUOTE(mhyug @ Aug 21 2014, 10:39 PM)
this mate of yours, before this he was working in the ong industry or other industry??
anyway its good to have a bit of both. chances are there, not easy but its there. work hard for it
Hello everyone,anyway its good to have a bit of both. chances are there, not easy but its there. work hard for it
Just hoping to get some opinion here. Same here, graduated with a chem eng degree last year. Been working in a project management role for almost a year in the oil and gas industry. Am hoping for a more technical role in the future. Was gonna leave my comfort zone and do a full time master degree. Some say that this is a suicidal mission and that probably i wont make it back to the industry.
I received offers from Heriot-Watt, UTM & UTP albeit its research mode in UTP and taught for the former two. I am in a terrible dilemma. So should I do a research mode master degree or a taught one? Negative thoughts has been running all over my head since and that research masters are less recognized by employers. Is this true?
Fees is a factor here. Assuming that I do not want to continue phD after masters, which is the best choice for me given my current scenario. However, I also hear that some people say that companies employed people based on their accomplishment which is an indication of their capability and that their research title is secondary (even though its not related).
P/s: Research title is on EOR.
Help me pleaseeee. Desperately wanna hear an opinion or two.
Aug 21 2014, 11:05 PM

Quote
0.3710sec
0.43
7 queries
GZIP Disabled