QUOTE(sylar111 @ Oct 16 2014, 07:45 PM)
It is not about the perfect translation. It's translating with integrity. Having the heart to translate the word of God as accurate as possible without adding the own meaning in so as not to taint the Word of God.
Well, reading the Bible is not the same as Reading a story book or a text book. You are talking about the Word of God here. And you want to make sure that what you read is not distorted. Even though it's harder to read the KJV. I sleep better knowing that what I read has not been distorted.
I really do not know how you can consider Dynamic Equivalent acceptable. I just shown you that just changing the grammer even 'of' with 'in' will distort the whole meaning away. Unless you want to just have a casual understanding of what you read and accept other people's opinion instead of the actual words of God then be it.
When I told you that NIV has certain section in it that is totally different from the other versions, I wasn't joking.
Even seminary students do not take NIV seriously. Taking NIV as a study material is an embarassment. And I am talking about seminary students who do are not so serious about the Word of God. So obviously, the words of this author cannot be taken seriously.
But since to you NIV is the acceptable version, then nothing I say will change your mind. You can read from man's interpretation of God's word.
Just wondering are you from Catholic church? Well, reading the Bible is not the same as Reading a story book or a text book. You are talking about the Word of God here. And you want to make sure that what you read is not distorted. Even though it's harder to read the KJV. I sleep better knowing that what I read has not been distorted.
I really do not know how you can consider Dynamic Equivalent acceptable. I just shown you that just changing the grammer even 'of' with 'in' will distort the whole meaning away. Unless you want to just have a casual understanding of what you read and accept other people's opinion instead of the actual words of God then be it.
When I told you that NIV has certain section in it that is totally different from the other versions, I wasn't joking.
Even seminary students do not take NIV seriously. Taking NIV as a study material is an embarassment. And I am talking about seminary students who do are not so serious about the Word of God. So obviously, the words of this author cannot be taken seriously.
But since to you NIV is the acceptable version, then nothing I say will change your mind. You can read from man's interpretation of God's word.
Discussing only. Relax la. Not that I declare NIV is the best or what.
Later I quote more points to refute
Oct 16 2014, 07:16 PM

Quote
0.0397sec
0.81
6 queries
GZIP Disabled