Which one of your orifice did you pull that piece of statistic out from? And didn't you say statistics are stupid? Oh yeah, they're not stupid if it's your statistics because you're the final authority on what's good and bad statistics. LOL!

So you found out already that she's passed out before she was gang banged, and she did not give consent prior to passing out?

Nope, what you've pointed out so far is that you ASSUME there's a crime taking place. And by doing so, you are absolving women from their responsibility to protect themselves.

That guy is memang like that one. He go no ammo already, then he'll just make stuff up about you, and then make personal attacks. And then he'll brush off facts that does not fit his biased world view, build his come backs based on false premise, then force his half truths and project his flaws onto others, and he will not admit his mistakes one, even when it is clearly pointed out.

So predictable talking to him that it has become boring already.

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Apr 22 2014, 11:43 AM

Difference between you using statistics and me using statistics is I don't call your statistics stupid, even though you're using extreme values, and I'm using realistic ones.

So no, it's not exactly what I have been doing. Not even close.

It's illogical that it is not consented, as there are many holes in TS' story (hypothetical as it may be) as I had pointed out, which suggest more of a girl putting herself in that situation, rather than being forced. But in typical predictable fashion, you'll plow through without addressing the loopholes.

My reasoning (you assume, I rarely do) is that innocent people be proven guilty. Was there a crime that took place in the first place? That can't even be first established, want to make noise. Fail.

The rest of the typical personal attack drivel ignored.

Right... like you're not quoting from soft science sources.

This shows your sheer stupidity. Being born with an ugly face is beyond one's control, putting oneself in a situation to be raped, isn't. Once again you're absolving responsibility from women.

There you go, assuming things again.

Not surprising.

Yes, putting yourself in a vulnerable situation means you're asking for it.

When a guy confesses his feelings for a girl, he risks rejection and getting his feelings hurt. Why don't you blame the women in such a situation then?

I didn't say it was directed at me, I said they're your typical personal attack style of response. Gosh, you are proving yourself to be quite the projectionist.

You're projecting. Don't you get that already?

Again you show your sheer stupidity. One can learn how to beat the crap out of the guy who tries to punch his ugly face, which will stop ALL future guys trying to punch him. That's called taking control.

Yes you are.

Right... Ok, please tell robbers not to rob, killers not to kill. Police and alarm installers can close shop and find other jobs already.

I call that stupidly twisting circumstances to fit one's biased view and ignoring facts.

No, yours is WAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYY worse. That's how innocent people end up in jail, and guilty people go free.

No, that's your narcissistic ego unable to accept the fact that you have a twisted view of the world.

Remaining irrelevant drivels once again ignored.

Like I said, you want to be the judge of what is good stats and what are bad stats, as long as it suits your purpose, you don't care what they mean. No point talking to you about this anymore.

Don't be stupid, or rather, be stupid. I was addressing your example of you being born with an ugly face by standing up to the guy who'd want to punch your ugly face. And you go about on a tirade about how to get everyone to think punching your ugly face is wrong, forgetting that everyone wants to punch your ugly face.

Obviously, you don't even know how to track your own arguments. No point talking to you about this anymore.

It's there, but in typical fashion, you choose to deny it.

I'm suggesting that you take care of what falls in the gray area.

Ok, so a bunch of people stood by and did nothing. That's a crime now too, huh?

How much is "some" drink. Let's face it, you don't have the whole picture, you just want to talk AS IF you're the only one with the whole picture, and failing miserably at it. Typical.

I noticed that despite the barrage of non sequitur, you still haven't established the conditions that a crime has been committed.

Btw, false rape accusers know that it is against the law to file a false report, yet they still do it. Why?

I asked a very simple question. Has a crime taken place? All you do is go on and on about how society does nothing, and how women who are drunk aren't giving consent, but motorcyclists who ride at 200 km/h should know better what the consequences are. Stupiak.

edit: New question - so why do false rape accusers file false rape reports?

I don't dislike the answer, I dislike how you DON'T answer, and then twist around pretending like you're all smart with the twisting around.

Please do.

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Apr 24 2014, 02:20 PM