Thinking to get Arctic Acelerror 7970 Extreme, but if 86C is normal/safe temp, might saving the moneh.
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V11, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V11, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
|
|
May 2 2014, 08:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
Hi all. Want to ask owner that use R9 series card.. I was doing burn in test in furmark, and the temp max go to 86C in within 5 mins, and stay that long in next 10mins. Fan 80%. Is it still safe?
Thinking to get Arctic Acelerror 7970 Extreme, but if 86C is normal/safe temp, might saving the moneh. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2014, 10:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
QUOTE(sai86 @ May 2 2014, 09:37 AM) yes safe. its very safe. but what is the vrm temp? also furmark is a stressing software until your gpu die. so in normal circumstances, you'll hardly hit that constant temp. (unless u run furmark 24/7/365 I see. Thanks for the info. Err. Im not sure about the VRM. Is it important as well?my 7870xt almost hit 100C on gpu and 110 on VRM and yet its still very safe below the max temp. **this temp is impossible to hit on gaming. I also notice that the review by our sifu goldfries for Asus DCUII R9 280x and furmark 15 test, temp is 86C while owikh Sapphire R9 280X Toxic and furmark 15 test, temp is 82C. Guess i'll skip the Arctic Accelero then. |
|
|
May 2 2014, 11:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
QUOTE(sai86 @ May 2 2014, 11:16 AM) yes. VRM temp > GPU temp. n sometimes VRM temp may be way higher than GPU temp alot. monitoring it is important as well as mostly VRM temp will hit 125C first than the GPU temp. Oh. Ok. Haha. I will test via heaven benchmark 4.0, and some gpu intensive gaming like Tomb Raider and Batman Arkham Origin, and monitor the VRM temp. GPU-Z is able to show both GPU and VRM temp. normally, i wont go and do Furmark as it stress the hell out of d gpu alot. Thanks bro. |
|
|
May 4 2014, 12:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
Guys, is there any other software to check VRM temp? As my GPU-Z not showing the VRM. Change the dpi setting also no go.
|
|
|
May 28 2014, 01:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
|
|
|
May 28 2014, 01:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
QUOTE(sai86 @ May 28 2014, 01:31 PM) for your comparison, depends on the game. I see. Coz i not yet see the 1440p in real life yet. Thanks for the explantion bro. i think its better to compare on both same settings but 1440p without AA vs 1080p with AA. but hey, a 1440p definitely is more gooding on 1080p and if you able to afford to get 1440p monitor, i don't see how you not able to afford a good gpu to support gaming on it. if you have a weak gpu, i believe its best for you to stick on 1080p for more enjoying/higher fps gaming experience. a good balance combination is better than unbalanced combination. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 30 2014, 10:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
I think Watchdogs quite boring eh. Dark Souls II better. Purchased the game bcoz all of its hype. Bad move. Lol
|
|
|
Nov 26 2014, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
I just read up few page back that MSI Lightning 290x going crazy at RM1299. Damn! That almost the price i paid for my 9 month old MSI TwinFroz 280x which is at RM1199.
Hope my card can last another year. Currently playing AC IV also need to tweak out some setting. Not to mention next gen title like Unity, COD AW. Now waiting for my DAI and see how it perform. This mid card only can play mid-high setting nowadays. |
|
|
Nov 26 2014, 01:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Nov 26 2014, 01:10 PM) Unity optimization is shit, i play on absolute minimum @34fps and max out ultra(FXAA) on 28fps. Yah. Same like when Watch Dogs release. Got issue with AMD card. But the fix come later. So i believe in should be the same with Unity.No problem with COD:AW unless you go nuts with the AA seting. I can play DA:I on mix of High-Very High with 60fps average. FarCry4 on High or Ultra if you can accept fluctuation of 35fps-70fps Ah! Can't wait my copy this Friday. The review look awesome with graphic and lovely world. QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Nov 26 2014, 01:13 PM) Eh bro,haven't seen in a while. Hey man. Yah that time after finish build, i go play game senyap2. Now open back this hardware section got so much news and the new release Nvidia card. Like come out from cave. Lolz.Anyway,AC Unity has frame-rate problems..Ubisoft are trying to fix it. But can play BF4 Ultra.. |
|
|
Nov 30 2014, 11:59 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
Ok, so i receive my Dragon Age Inquisition on Friday. Just begin to install and play yesterday.
Hmm.. With the latest Beta Driver 14.11xx something I've getting about 36+- on default Ultra setting, and sometime drop below 30. I thought i will not feel a different between 3x fps with 6x fps. Turn out, i did notice the different in gameplay. No wonder everyone keep hunting 6x fps. |
|
|
Nov 30 2014, 04:00 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
QUOTE(TheHitman47 @ Nov 30 2014, 12:32 PM) I agree on this. Price wise, AMD always better since ATI era. Can't wait for next R9 3xx series on Feb. Look very promising. Crap, my 280x only last with me for a year if i upgrade to 3 series. Time to max out. |
|
|
Dec 1 2014, 12:06 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Nov 30 2014, 10:47 PM) Why lower the Texture? It doesn't affect fps that much... and quality apparently. Maybe i did this wrong. No, my term is wrong. Lol. I was mean the Tessellation to Med. Anyway my setting now as per below. Slightly tweak the Ultra setting with MSAA turn off. Getting 4x-5x fps, with average about 49fps. Good enough for me. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « ![]() |
|
|
Dec 1 2014, 12:09 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,468 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Karakura Town |
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Nov 30 2014, 11:14 PM) Well if the jump from 280X to 380X in terms of performance isn't that much,i'd say upto you,i'd not. Wait, i thought R9 380x pawn current R9 290x / gtx 980. If so, then its a quite good upgrade provide the price less than 2k hopefully. Edit: or i mess up with R9 390x benchmark. Lolz. This post has been edited by creative zn: Dec 1 2014, 12:13 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0216sec
0.66
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:45 AM |