QUOTE(ShinG3e @ Jun 2 2014, 11:29 AM)
Bug them about it... Apr div should be in long time already.Fundsupermart.com v6, Manage your own unit trust portfolio
Fundsupermart.com v6, Manage your own unit trust portfolio
|
|
Jun 2 2014, 01:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2014, 02:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jun 3 2014, 11:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(David83 @ Jun 2 2014, 06:58 PM) Portfolio update for May 2014: How long has this been running?
AmDynamic Bond is not doing good. NAV keeps sliding. This post has been edited by wodenus: Jun 3 2014, 11:44 AM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Jun 3 2014, 05:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jun 3 2014, 09:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
So everyone who had KGF units last year.. how long did it take for the dividends to be paid?
|
|
|
Jun 6 2014, 10:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(edwardSL @ Jun 6 2014, 09:57 PM) Today very happy to see my portfolio up 1% (due to KGF dividend) AMBond used to be the best performing bond around... I remember it was fully subscribed once.Overall portfolio looking great as this few days keep going up~ just left my bond fund (Ambond) still in red zone due to the kinsteel issue, wonder when will it resolve and bring back green to Ambond lol... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2014, 10:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2014, 11:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(David83 @ Jun 5 2014, 09:43 PM) ECB deposit rate lowered to negative region: How does a negative return work, do banks charge you for saving money? ECB President Mario Draghi reduced the deposit rate to minus 0.10 percent from zero, making the institution the world’s first major central bank to use a negative rate. Policy makers also lowered the benchmark rate to 0.15 percent from 0.25 percent. Draghi will hold a press conference at 2:30 p.m. in Frankfurt. URL: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-05/d...toric-move.html |
|
|
Jun 12 2014, 02:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 12 2014, 11:36 AM) Today I'm in good mood so I gonna write more KidSave is kind of flat now right?CMF is VERY LIQUID, u place withdrawal/sell order by 3PM on a working day, within 2 WORKING DAYS FSM will credit to your bank account. RHB-OSK (the fund manager for CMF) takes money of investors in that fund and places in FDs of differing maturities and money market deposits. It's like, u have RM365,000, and u place RM1K in 12 months FD EVERY SINGLE DAY, so that u have a maturing FD cert every day. Currently CMF yield is about 3.08% Liquid and safe AND high return? No such thing exists. If u have at least 3 years investment horizon...do consider consistent performers like RHB-OSK KidSave, Hwang Select Balanced, AmConservative. |
|
|
Jun 12 2014, 02:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(forextor @ Jun 12 2014, 11:28 AM) Correct me if I am wrong, Cash Management Fund is more liquid than Fixed Deposit right?.. Depends, some banks you can cancel the FD but you won't have any interest added. So as far as liquidity is concerned, they may both be the same. |
|
|
Jun 16 2014, 02:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(yklooi @ Jun 13 2014, 05:18 PM) just a note....if the NAV of your Hwang fund dropped a lot today...dun be afraid...it may just be distribution. "Slightly" depends on how much you have invested. 0.4% of Rm500,000 is an extra Rm2000 a year ......between 1983 and 2013. Amazingly, the investor who dollar-cost-averaged at annual market peaks only performed slightly poorer than another investor who simply invested at the end of each year; the first investor would have gotten annualised returns of 9.5% while the second investor had earned 9.9%. http://www.fool.sg/2014/06/10/why-its-okay...-a-market-high/ (click Refresh if prompted to log in) DCA is better than not investing, but not better than lump-sum, as far as long-term capital growth is concerned. This post has been edited by wodenus: Jun 16 2014, 02:46 PM |
|
|
Jun 16 2014, 03:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jun 16 2014, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(nothingz @ Jun 16 2014, 03:34 PM) how do you know lump sum is better? Unless you can time the market, you know when is the lowest point you should buy in. Based on that guy's study? and many others. QUOTE whereas DCA is a risk averse method due to you buy in at different point of the time, no matter the price is high or low. Therefore minimise the fluctuation. The point here is to increase long-term profit, not to decrease volatility. QUOTE(nothingz @ Jun 16 2014, 03:34 PM) either way also can achieve long term capital growth but lump sum purchase is more for risk taker Yea it's more risky in the short-term but then we are talking about profits not risks. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2014, 04:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(nothingz @ Jun 16 2014, 04:14 PM) anyway, there is no way to justify lump sum investment approach can generate higher long term profit because there are other investment approach such as VCA. http://www.moneychimp.com/features/dollar_cost.htm http://ibd.morningstar.com/article/article...Id=12,%20brf295 QUOTE(http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2013/11/biz_brain_in_todays_market_lum.html) He calls dollar-cost-averaging a risk reduction technique and not a wealth enhancing technique. Because stock markets rise about two-thirds of the time, he said, investing your $100,000 all at once will lead to greater wealth more often. It's actually all about perceived risk than actual risk. People DCA because they can't stand to lose money. Maybe it's better if they lump-sum and manage their mental state instead of their money The point is this.. do you believe that it is going to go up? if yes, why aren't you all in now? if not, why are you in at all? the market won't be so volatile that the edge you get in investing small sums at market downturns can beat the edge you get being invested with a large sum as the market rises. It just makes you feel better. It doesn't make you more money, but it makes you feel better psychologically. Also, who is going to DCA your account after you are dead.. you have to consider that as well. Suppose you DCA your account.. maybe you have a beneficiary account in your son's or daughter's or nephew's or niece's name. He/She is a year old now. Stick Rm500,000 in it, with your fund manager, and a clause in your will that says this money you can't touch for 50 years. Next year you are in a traffic accident, or have a heart attack and pass away. Your money is still safe, in 50 years' time your beneficiary is a multi-millionaire, won't have to worry about retirement. If you have say Rm10,000 with your fund manager, with plans to invest Rm500,000 in your lifetime and the same thing happens, your beneficiaries won't nearly be as rich, you can't guarantee that they won't spend the money that you leave to them. That's something you have to think about. This post has been edited by wodenus: Jun 16 2014, 04:57 PM |
|
|
Jun 18 2014, 01:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(xuzen @ Jun 16 2014, 10:30 PM) RM450k. That is like a conservative 5.5% per annum. And this is only touching his profit, I mean, if he continues like this, technically his asset is perpetual. But then again... 450K in an FD in MBSB or BR... is also perpetual, depending on expenditure.Xuzen Rm450,000 x 4.5% = Rm1,687 a month. Not too hard to survive either considering, but of course UT is usually more than that, and we always want more profit out of it This post has been edited by wodenus: Jun 18 2014, 01:34 PM |
|
|
Jun 18 2014, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(azrash @ Jun 18 2014, 03:50 PM) so your benchmark portfolio is one of pub mutual UT? Yea, that means 200K would be worth 580K.. 400K now would make you a millionaire I learned about Sharpe ratio from a finance unit that I took. I am using it as another factor when considering different UT, other than their consistency in yearly returns. I am using the straight up Sharpe ratio that is usually given in the fund fact sheet. If average inflation is around 3% a year. Today's 2k would worth 5.8k when I retire. Crazy. |
|
|
Jun 18 2014, 10:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MNet @ Jun 18 2014, 08:22 PM) that why I say eUT is better Bleh.. They charge 0.70 with FPX.. and their news is not up to date even eUnitTrust Raya & Merdeka Promotion 2014 Dear Valued Customers, Celebrate Hari Raya and Malaysia's 57th year Merdeka with 57 selected funds at up to 0% sales charge when you invest RM10,000 and above. In conjunction with our recent PhillipCapital 5th Annual Investment Conference 2014, we have specially selected 57 funds from the participating fund houses, including performing shariah funds. ![]() I mean think about it, suppose you put in Rm1000 at 1%. You save 1%.. that is Rm1? okay so you save Rm1. Now you want to put in say Rm200 every month.. and then you get charged Rm0.70 every month, that's like Rm8.40 a year. So you are going to spend Rm8.40 a year.. to save Rm1? This post has been edited by wodenus: Jun 18 2014, 10:04 PM |
|
|
Jun 19 2014, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(xuzen @ Jun 19 2014, 10:25 AM) 1% of RM 1,000.00 = RM 10.00 Doesn't change the point, it will be Rm16.80 in two years, so you will still be spending RM16.80 to save Rm10 |
|
|
Jun 19 2014, 01:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2014, 08:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,990 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0438sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 12:52 PM |