Warcraft 3: WCG rule vs SMM rule vs Singapore AP rule, need ur feedback
Warcraft 3: WCG rule vs SMM rule vs Singapore AP rule, need ur feedback
|
|
Jul 24 2006, 11:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 12:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
u talk about the losers complainin ? like synzor said at least u guys made the heart n effort to improve the rules for future better game play... tats wat it should be makin the game a better playing rules for the future not the past ... yea regarding backdoor n wardin i think is should be allowed coz is really not easy to backdoor not like ver5 n warding is purely a strategy .. restriction causes it to lower game plays .. less strats intense... i really support -Ap draft since asian championship is using it .. n is really the most skill intense mode due to hero counter drafting
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 01:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
if u would play -AP u would know is the most fair mode coz it could go both ways... i believe all top teams would agree wif me tat scourge/senti has its imbaness in which ever versions like 6.27b most ppl think senti is imba n scourge is weaker where not 6.32b most teams goes scourge which is clearly the stronger sides .. so -Ap is definately the most balanced version... since is really up to team strategy in drafting n players adaption skillz
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 02:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
I think 3rd -AP game should be the way to go... since u wanna represent malaysia to Asian CHampionship in Singapore.. why not learn n get used to it? rather than goin there n have like zero ideas? About the rest of the 3 rules i totally agree wif Ian's suggestion .. apart from tat tower count is = = just go wif the point system or if its really tower count make it a 90 mins game is more consistent ...
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 05:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(nles @ Jul 25 2006, 03:10 PM) So you're suggesting, if point system we should use 60minutes while if tower count we should use 90minutes yea if its 60 mins it should be point system... n i still stand by saying -AP draft should be implemented well at least for the 3rd deciding game .. dude we are representin malaysia to go singapore to play thier -Ap draft mode of ASIAN CHAMPIONSHIP is it really tat bad for -Ap draft ? if so why bother sent a malaysia team to go if ur not willing to even try -Ap draft mode?Currently Malaysia tourney all using normal pick, and i agree some 1 did say that is a "Sentinel VS Scrouge" game. |
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 11:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(sowhatz @ Jul 25 2006, 11:11 PM) yea AP is better..n for zxcvbnm if u say that Enigma + Magnataur + Lich + Treant + EarthShaker = OMG!!!! then u r really OMG...u think ur combo so perfect n everytime ur magnataur can catch all meh totally agree wif sowhat.. come on la ur wicked combo is 3 mellee? besides -Ap is in DRAFT mode meanin each team picks 1 each infront of the referee la .. so is really about smart strategy counter draftin n putin a good combo at the same time .. if this is not strats of skill intensive then i really dunno wat is |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0223sec
0.53
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 10:50 PM |