QUOTE(HawkreiN @ Nov 1 2014, 12:12 AM)
Yes it would differ, to an extent. But then again, even Monash campuses within Australia would differ (eg. Clayton vs Caulfield vs Berwick). Whether the delivery of the course if better depends on your learning style - Aus appears to promote more discussion (simply because local students tend to shy away from participation).
Personally, I feel that the quality/ insights of the lecturers make minimal impact at an undergraduate level, especially for a generic degree in commerce. But then again, your perception becomes your reality.
Monash graduate here. I've had the honour of being able to study at Monash in Malaysia and at the Clayton campus. I have to agree with you that the quality of teaching doesn't necessarily differ across the campuses but it's actually all down to personal preferences. Yes, the Aussie campuses tend to focus more on participation. Again, this is probably down to their culture. From my experience they are more relaxed in their teaching styles and also tend to reward students if they can see that you've tried your best etc. Malaysian campus, work your ass off and you still get mediocre marks. It's the cultural difference. Asians tend to be more demanding when it comes to quality of work. To think about it, when I was in Aus the students would be amazed at how professionally done our lab reports were. In comparison, they'd scribble stuff on a piece of paper and pass it up as their lab reports. Plus don't be surprised when our level of written English is actually higher than the local Aussie students.Personally, I feel that the quality/ insights of the lecturers make minimal impact at an undergraduate level, especially for a generic degree in commerce. But then again, your perception becomes your reality.
Nov 13 2014, 08:51 PM

Quote
0.0144sec
0.56
7 queries
GZIP Disabled