Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Developers and their reputation, Share your thoughts on them

views
     
[Ancient]-XinG-
post Jul 15 2018, 01:33 PM

20k VIP club
*******
Senior Member
5,752 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
no WCT?

no ECO?

Let me have my comment on WCT.

Main project Bandar bukit tingggi 1 & 2.
Remarks - For me its a 5 stars township. Very good and well planned. used every inch of land brilliantly. Importantly the road map far much more better than the setia alam. We don't actually face jam like setia people need to at NKVE there. Bukit tinggi 1 is the boom. You want apa also got. the only lacking is primary and secondary school. that's it. And the greatest thing ever is that you have Tesco Extra and AEON mall in 1 township. Who got that?

Regarding product outcome. 3/5. Cracks at beam, uneven surface. Weak roof. Poor piping. Drain clogged. Wrong choise of trees.

BUT BUT BUT

WCT is fking greedy cunt. After a few years, they started to build the Landmark, which serve close to nothing. And lately is the LEAD@IMPERIA residence. Building of service apartment and re road causing the previous taman owner facing huge difficulties on coming out of taman and need run extra miles due to their fancy enterence to the serveiced apartment. Jam everywhere. Poor road condition. Promised promises never come.

Still overall, its a better town outhere. Its well know that developer is always on the greedy site, we cant do shit.

Overall stars 4/5 drop to 2/5.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0212sec    0.71    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 04:31 PM