Nokia X,XL and X+ are suitable for entry level Android user who is Nokia supporter. So far, Nokia still keep it's characteristic - solid feel and moderate quality for budget phone. The Nokia Android phones are selling in a reasonable price with Qualcomm chipset in case of compare with other brands (Alca, Hua, Leno, Nine, CXL) are using Mediatek chipset still selling RM300++. From my own survey, Mediatek chipset are weak GPS, weak wifi signal and weak output sound. Very lucky, Nokia chosen Qualcomm chipset as phone motherboard. On GPU side, all these 3 phones are using Adreno 203, suppose the maximum support resolution is 480 X 854 pixels, but Nokia used 480 X 800 pixels to keep the smoothness of UI interface. The LCD has IPS but lack of scratch protection likes Corning Gorrila glass. Understand that the reason of budget and normally budget phone not using this kind of glass. Even the Sam Gran Two also did not have. Not forget to mention CPU is Dual-core 1 GHz Cortex-A5. Although the Cortex-A5 structure is for lower performance device but very battery saving. Nokia packed Li-Ion battery with capacity 2000mAh (Nokia XL) is more than the suitable because the latest Ifone just packed with 1560mAh capacity battery. The physical spec wrote Nokia X has 512MB RAM, but the actual usable RAM is 381MB because some MB of RAM is used to be VM and Cache. The 381MB RAM can running a Facebook app and Whatapps in background is the bottleneck. Some of the Leno Android budget phone (A3X9i) is lack of GPS, at least these Nokia Android budget phone has GPS with A-GPS support. Overall, the desgin, features and performance are tally with the price tag.

This post has been edited by lc3287: Apr 8 2014, 12:19 AM

I have made a comparison chart in attachment for Nokia X and Asus Zenfone 4.
Overall, Zenfone physical spec mostly better than Nokia X.
Nokia X only better than Zenfone 4 in side of Battery capacity and support FM Radio.



This post has been edited by lc3287: Apr 20 2014, 10:25 AM