SA ajar punya: "that one is engine pre startup diagnostics, must wait for it to complete"



oh don't scare die me ma

no la mini TT with david this morning (yes until 2am lol, i slept at 5am woke up 9am for work )

mentioned about sifu ma

This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Feb 21 2014, 01:19 PM

i very rajin spam jor lol

wa how to parse/decipher the logged data? sounds like a lot of work also

you think it'll help in making what i want to achieve with the mivec timing easier? or actually more hassle than dyno/butt tuning?

hmm i guess it depends on how accurate you need the data to be? i mean, NA 1.8 also, not too much you can play with la right? it kinda depends on how the mode23 can be enabled and deciphered, and if you have to deal with hex codes, might as well screw it and stick to simpler methods

done remap by k3 jor wo...

7k rpm

take lrt la

haha yea. for me it's just more on my own preference on having a funner car to ride. and as i mentioned it is probably not practical for daily rides just from the higher FC alone.

in fact as a layman observation, if the rpm can hold much better after lifting my foot off the accelerator completely, that definitely benefits on FC as i don't have to re-accelerate again

actually i think most of you guys also older than i am so i don't really mind. maybe only nzh younger lol!

older mivec cam lifts la lol

yeah actually i'm not that keen on end hp also, though still curious which one actually yields more.

it's more towards how the stock mivec the rpm can rise insanely fast while the new mapping it's like my xw20 EO suddenly got swapped to xw40
ultimately i still get similar speedometer speeds, however i just can't seem to get that insane torque pull/acceleration/rpm climb as before. (but of course, at the expense of stupidly high FC lolz)

pretty much as you said la, power dun come for free.

and thanks for the wiring diagram, tonight con9lan7firm chabutz

stock cannot la, the ignition timing and afr like crap lol and i prefer to see dyno figures to eliminate butt dyno ma

the stock mivec timing lar aduh

=edit=
well i think it could help, but again, id rather have a more objective approach to this than just butt dyno la

so wait till got money arrange dyno tuning lo

This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Feb 21 2014, 04:11 PM

hmm hard to describe/explain over text

but the gist is that the rpms do climb faster (although again, falls faster if you don't maintain acceleration)
considering i don't drive the car a whole lot, i can wait until i get enough money for a dyno tune session la, no rush in this lol.

i wonder if nzh0920 can explain better since he driven my car (and likewise i've driven his)
the advanced throttle is

well i did mentioned it *could* be butt dyno la...
because i tekan jor, jump faster than current map, then 4k rpm LAGI jump lol...

on the dyno machine, on low gear (during calibration) the torque went over 200++ rofl
iinm it went as high as 240 or so, dunno cock eye or what la.
so it was pretty fun being pushed into the seat while now can't get it jor, hence a bit anal on the subject la which i apologize again/in advance

i'm inclined towards (or blaming) on the mivec settings because advancing the ignition timing/leaning the afr slightly (as you've shown me) would only mean positive results and should not affect the engine characteristics much. and the only thing left seems to be mivec timing which makes sense considering minimum 4 basic modes (again based on the timing mappings etc)

i'm not sure if the ultra light viscosity EO would make the MIVEC characteristics more apparent since it's also using oil pressure to control the rotors and what not right? so maybe as the oil moves faster, the changing of mivec timing (eg: different engine speed/load) is more apparent which could be what i experienced (on stock) and experiencing on remapped?
have there been anyone using ultra light viscosity before me and played with the mivec timing mappings?

again, i could be very wrong in this since i am really new in this while you folks have many years of experience ahead of me however i still firmly believe things can be further improved (or rather, tailored to my preference) and i am willing to bear with the consequences it may hold (eg: piss poor FC i am getting prior to remap) since i do not drive the car daily lol (as mentioned, it just sits at home until night job/weekend and just let stray cats paint cat paw car decals all over it only )

and yes i fully understand your analogy here which also puts me in a difficult position to explain la
btw you coming TT mou? if you got we can exchange salty coffee la (i'll be a bit late la, maybe 1-2 am? what's the latest hours you can stay up till?)

i think we mutually don't understand each other la... atm probably nzh0920 would get a slight idea since he driven my car while it's stock and i did remember he did a clutch in with the rpm jumped as he wasn't used to it lol.

could be! however it can't be just me as my car was test driven by quite a number of people. and if you read my dyno review, even the owner was a bit surprised on the car as well.

i didn't say there isn't difference, there OBVIOUSLY was a difference considering what i have posted.
and yes, as you said, my main concern was the bolded part.

i actually WANT that surge.
why else some people prefer the old mivec/vtec that actuall open/kick in/lifts (whatever you want to call it) even if it isn't smooth and is unpleasant, hell, during dyno there was an old DOHC mivec (4g92? lol), during the high cam lift ,you can see the engine drops hp/torque for a slight moment then picks it back up with the high cam (which is damn loud btw )
that's pretty crap for efficiency but yet some people likes it.

wait dyno session la, can get objective comparisons lol

will do testing on dyno tuning session lo

got some planning for LCP geh, but wait till i can get cash lo

Enough for me to stay away lo lol