Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography EF50mm f/1.4 USM

views
     
TSreevanshirls
post Feb 5 2014, 11:47 PM, updated 12y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
Planning to get an EF50mm f/1.4 USM lens to replace my 70D kit lens, should I or should I not?
SUSXiia0Ban
post Feb 5 2014, 11:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(reevanshirls @ Feb 5 2014, 11:47 PM)
Planning to get an EF50mm f/1.4 USM lens to replace my 70D kit lens, should I or should I not?
*
What type of photos normally you take? Landscape/Portrait/Macro and etc...
Different type of photography use different type of lens.

TSreevanshirls
post Feb 5 2014, 11:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 5 2014, 11:54 PM)
What type of photos normally you take? Landscape/Portrait/Macro and etc...
Different type of photography use different type of lens.
*
Portrait bro!
SUSXiia0Ban
post Feb 6 2014, 12:01 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(reevanshirls @ Feb 5 2014, 11:55 PM)
Portrait bro!
*
Do bear in mind that 50mm on 70d is almost equivalent with what you're seeing right now. Imagine you put a frame in front of your eyes. You capture exactly what you see.

Somehow you might found out that 50mm is not wide enough. This happens to me as well.

For me,I will get a 50mm f1.8 instead and one more additional lens.

Just my own opinion. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by Xiia0Ban: Feb 6 2014, 12:01 AM
TSreevanshirls
post Feb 6 2014, 12:19 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 6 2014, 12:01 AM)
Do bear in mind that 50mm on 70d is almost equivalent with what you're seeing right now. Imagine you put a frame in front of your eyes. You capture exactly what you see.

Somehow you might found out that 50mm is not wide enough. This happens to me as well.

For me,I will get a 50mm f1.8 instead and one more additional lens.

Just my own opinion. tongue.gif
*
I'm also into some long exposure photography, and also EF50mm f/1.4 USM lets in 60% more light then then 1.8 which I logically assumed would be better under low light situations. Should I just get both?
SUSXiia0Ban
post Feb 6 2014, 12:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(reevanshirls @ Feb 6 2014, 12:19 AM)
I'm also into some long exposure photography, and also EF50mm f/1.4 USM lets in 60% more light then then 1.8 which I logically assumed would be better under low light situations. Should I just get both?
*
You won't need 50mm f1.8 when you already have 50mm f1.4.
Both are good for low light but 50mm f1.4 due to bigger aperture that able to allow more light to go into the sensor.
50mm f1.4 is much more faster than 50mm f1.8 due to 50mm f1.4 is using USM which allow silent and quick AF.

I assume that you have the budget for 50mm f1.4, why not get 50mm f1.8 and other lenses as well. brows.gif

This post has been edited by Xiia0Ban: Feb 6 2014, 12:30 AM
TSreevanshirls
post Feb 6 2014, 12:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 6 2014, 12:28 AM)
You won't need 50mm f1.8 when you already have 50mm f1.4.
Both are good for low light but 50mm f1.4 due to bigger aperture that able to allow more light to go into the sensor.
50mm f1.4 is much more faster than 50mm f1.8 due to 50mm f1.4 is using USM which allow silent and quick AF.

I assume that you have the budget to get 50mm f1.4, why not get 50mm f1.8 and get other lenses as well.  brows.gif
*
Thx for the advice, helped heaps - cheers mate!

This post has been edited by reevanshirls: Feb 6 2014, 12:33 AM
SUSXiia0Ban
post Feb 6 2014, 12:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(reevanshirls @ Feb 6 2014, 12:30 AM)
Thx for the advice, helped heaps - cheer  mate!
*
Maybe you should go and try out the lenses before you buy. thumbup.gif
TSreevanshirls
post Feb 6 2014, 12:36 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 6 2014, 12:33 AM)
Maybe you should go and try out the lenses before you buy. thumbup.gif
*
Definitely would do that, 50mm 1.4 sound like a good lens, but we’ll just have to see about that.
bbear
post Feb 6 2014, 10:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


I have 35 F2.0, 50 F1.8 and 50 F1.4

- Personally like 50 F1.4 for portraiture, low light photography
- 50mm may be too long for 7D as walk around
- My wife prefers to have 35mm full time on the 7D vs 50mm

just my 2 cents

This post has been edited by bbear: Feb 6 2014, 10:52 AM
SUSXiia0Ban
post Feb 6 2014, 10:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(bbear @ Feb 6 2014, 10:52 AM)
I have 35 F2.0, 50 F1.8 and 50 F1.4

- Personally like 50 F1.4 for portraiture, low light photography
- 50mm may be too long for 7D as walk around
- My wife prefers to have 35mm full time on the 7D vs 50mm

just my 2 cents
*
Too long in term of the focal length? You may find 50mm is not wide enough sometimes.
bbear
post Feb 6 2014, 11:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 6 2014, 10:58 AM)
Too long in term of the focal length? You may find 50mm is not wide enough sometimes.
*
Yes, both are the same things, just one in Focal Length vs one in Viewing Angle

Another thing to take note.

Both 50mm F1.4 and F1.8 has longer minimum focus distance in comparison to the 35mm F2.0 that i have. My wife is a Travel and Food blogger and at times, 7D with 50mm is not possible to take closer photo of the foods. The 35mm F2.0 does allows her to do so with getting nearer to the foods she is photographing

This post has been edited by bbear: Feb 6 2014, 11:04 AM
Baronic
post Feb 6 2014, 11:09 AM

Problem?
Group Icon
Staff
7,533 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Lowyat.net Malaysia Sex: Yes please


QUOTE(reevanshirls @ Feb 6 2014, 12:36 AM)
Definitely would do that, 50mm 1.4 sound like a good lens, but we’ll just have to see about that.
*
consider the sigma 50mm 1.4. You can google for reviews between the canon and the sigma version. i chose sigma in the end. on a cropped tho, 50mm is not what "your eyes see". thats on full frame. if u wanna get "as your eyes see" its more like 30-35mm on a cropped.
SUSXiia0Ban
post Feb 6 2014, 11:12 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Baronic @ Feb 6 2014, 11:09 AM)
consider the sigma 50mm 1.4. You can google for reviews between the canon and the sigma version. i chose sigma in the end. on a cropped tho, 50mm is not what "your eyes see". thats on full frame. if u wanna get "as your eyes see" its more like 30-35mm on a cropped.
*
Really? How come my 70d and 50mm is equal to what my eyes see. That's confusing.
Baronic
post Feb 6 2014, 11:16 AM

Problem?
Group Icon
Staff
7,533 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Lowyat.net Malaysia Sex: Yes please


QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 6 2014, 11:12 AM)
Really? How come my 70d and 50mm is equal to what my eyes see. That's confusing.
*
the field of view of a 50mm is narrow, its not what your eyes see, its towards telephoto a bit already. but put that same lense on a 50mm then its considered "as the eye sees it". And the equivalent of that is the 30-35mm lense on a crop.
Baronic
post Feb 6 2014, 11:19 AM

Problem?
Group Icon
Staff
7,533 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Lowyat.net Malaysia Sex: Yes please


i should rephrase from "as the eye sees" to "standard lense", as the debate on what is "as the eye sees" is way too deep.
SUSXiia0Ban
post Feb 6 2014, 11:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Baronic @ Feb 6 2014, 11:16 AM)
the field of view of a 50mm is narrow, its not what your eyes see, its towards telephoto a bit already.  but put that same lense on a 50mm then its considered "as the eye sees it". And the equivalent of that is the 30-35mm lense on a crop.
*
In term of the angle, you're correct. What I'm talking about is in term of the focal length.

Sorry that I'm not so good in explaining. tongue.gif
memster
post Feb 6 2014, 11:42 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Feb 2014
Well 50mm is equivalent to 80mm, pretty much on the telephoto side, awesome for portraits.

The build is good as well so you probably won't regret buying one.

But if you're going to use it on a daily basis it's gonna be quite a hassle. Have you considered getting one of those 35mm f/1.4 lens from Sigma? It translates to roughly 56mm equivalent and would be more suitable for indoor or daily portrait use.


This post has been edited by memster: Feb 6 2014, 11:42 AM
Rice_Owl84
post Feb 6 2014, 01:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
Keep the kit lens and then treat the 50mm f1.4 lens as a specialty lens. I have the cheaper 50mm F1.8 lens and it takes great pictures and great indoor portraits.

But when its like when you taking a portrait of someone and then all their friends come along for a group picture. Group picture with a 50mm prime is no fun.

50mm on crop is not a lens that can deal with every situation. So yeah treat it as a specialty lens.
goldfries
post Feb 6 2014, 01:22 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




The Canon EF 50mm 1.4 is really nice. It performs a lot better than the 1.8 in terms of speed and accuracy, much less hunting and you have FTM with it.

I went for the Canon unit because Sigma unit is problematic, usually the front focusing / back focusing issue. Furthermore I have no confidence in Sigma's local distributor service but Canon is top-notched.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0213sec    0.62    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 08:58 AM