Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 fat burner

views
     
alien9
post Feb 5 2014, 12:36 AM

These stars mean nothing
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Jelatek / Wangsa Maju


You can burn fat if you have caloric deficit, not surplus. And fat burner only helps to ease the fat burning, not magically makes your body have a 10% caloric deficit.
alien9
post Feb 5 2014, 09:24 AM

These stars mean nothing
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Jelatek / Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(AmmoShaf @ Feb 5 2014, 01:04 AM)
Sorry but I'm quite confuse here. Let say I'm in the process of gaining mass but at the same time want to lose some fat, I wont lose the fat if I'm having a caloric surplus?
*
Caloric surplus = mass gain.

Caloric deficit = loss mass.

Gaining mass and losing fat are two different objectives with entirely opposite requirements. You can't do both UNLESS you have a lot of experience of doing both objectives successfully.
alien9
post Feb 5 2014, 12:34 PM

These stars mean nothing
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Jelatek / Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(AmmoShaf @ Feb 5 2014, 12:10 PM)
Ok, understood about the caloric surplus and caloric deposit. So if I want to lose some belly fat, I need to sacrifice gaining mass? I'm trying to eat as clean as I can at the moment to make sure I consume less dirty fat. But if I can't loss fat when having caloric surplus, I think I need to eat less right?
*
I repeat again:

If you want to lose weight, you need to have a caloric deficit.

If you want to gain weight, you need to have a caloric surplus.

Both are opposite objectives and obviously you need to choose either one during a certain period of time.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0138sec    0.60    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 08:42 AM