QUOTE(wodenus @ Oct 28 2014, 12:17 PM)
Already vacant for long time, so it's already accounted for in the yieldM Reits Version 6, Malaysia Real Estate Investment Trust
M Reits Version 6, Malaysia Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
Oct 28 2014, 12:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#221
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 28 2014, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#222
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2014, 05:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#223
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(CP88 @ Oct 29 2014, 03:28 PM) I dumped Homeriz and Scientex to take profit during the mini crash recently, move the $$$ to Quill Yeah, those 2 stocks have recovered, but profit in hand and peace of mind, why not? This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Oct 29 2014, 05:51 PM |
|
|
Oct 30 2014, 09:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#224
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(CP88 @ Oct 30 2014, 06:42 AM) QUOTE(felixmask @ Oct 30 2014, 07:19 AM) take over by MRCB- potential inject their exisiting asset into REITS. ^ felixmask answered already example NU sentral, and etc Office building KL sentral. Yield also decent, net yield (after 10% withholding tax) is 6%+ |
|
|
Oct 30 2014, 12:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#225
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
felix is rumour magnet
good to have this black little kitty around |
|
|
Oct 30 2014, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#226
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
NAV is irrelevant for REITs - u invest in a REIT for its rental yield, u don't invest in a REIT and expecting its management to buy and sell properties for profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2014, 07:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#227
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2014, 09:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#228
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(felixmask @ Oct 31 2014, 08:48 AM) I can tell when ppl purposely pose stupid questions to play/tease/troll Back to topic... NAV won't be realised unless the REIT dispose off the properties... If sell all... No more recurring rental income the REIT manager jobless already That's why valuing a REIT using its NAV is irrelevant This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Oct 31 2014, 09:12 AM |
|
|
Oct 31 2014, 10:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#229
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2014, 11:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#230
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
U may have a RM1M worth of property
But if u cannot rent it out, also die |
|
|
Oct 31 2014, 11:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#231
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
To reiterate...
U buy a REIT for its cash flows NOT for its valuation |
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 12:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#232
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 12:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#233
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(bursalchemy @ Nov 1 2014, 12:21 PM) Yes. i also spotted it. I think it is undervalued. But i don't have much info about their property. As I am back to Sabah after finish studying in KL. How the occupancy rate there? Who is its backbone tenants? Mostly members of the AmBank GroupGo their website to find out the details This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Nov 1 2014, 12:29 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 01:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#234
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(bursalchemy @ Nov 1 2014, 12:37 PM) means the tenants are quite secure? They won't easily leave. One thing to consider, is the rental fees receive based on arm's length? As they are related parties.. AmBank being a listed entity, surely SHOULD be at arms length...But rental reversion upside, being in a same group, I think would not be too aggressive. Btw, I look at your personal balance sheet...your net worth only 50K+, but assets 300K+ You're quite heavily leveraged This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Nov 1 2014, 01:12 PM |
|
|
Nov 2 2014, 08:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#235
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
The gain % so huge
Must have bought during crisis This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Nov 2 2014, 08:55 PM |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 01:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#236
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(Babizz @ Nov 4 2014, 01:35 PM) For instance, I can see less footfall large malls(think MV) and the situation will deteriorate when new malls like IOI City redirect some shoppers from KL south.. The GST will also strongly hit retail spend.. MidValley and Gardens should remain strong, go see the traffic (human and cars) and you'll know. Coming developments across the river will make the area even more traffic.So many new malls coming up in the next 4 years with regional malls in TRX, Bukit Jalil/OUG (paradigm/pavi), Cheras (Velo/Ikea), Putrajaya(IOI City), Shah Alam(I city), Damansara(Empire n Tropicana Gardens) are just among the many malls not including new city centre options. It's about time to identify which offices/malls will be affected and which ones will remain strong U see, the malls u mentioned are mostly Klang Valley. CMMT has malls outside Klang Valley too, Sg Wang is only a small % of its overall portfolio. And once MRT construction is over, I foresee sudden uptick in numbers, it being in Golden Triangle. |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 01:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#237
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(Babizz @ Nov 4 2014, 01:46 PM) true about capita malls as Gurney Mall will remain solid.. not sure about how the Mines is doing.. Well, no one is expecting amazing growth when investing in REITs anyway I only analyze KL n Iskandar props including retail malls/office la.. I'm sticking with my negative outlook of old office blocks and neutral outlook for established malls. They will continue to perform well but I wouldn't expect any significant growth |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 08:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#238
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2014, 09:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#239
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(jasonkwk @ Nov 5 2014, 09:22 AM) CMMT is a Blue Chip except the Sungai wang plaza asset, they just need to do AEI to make it upscale enough and not be lala paradise. THe MRT reason is a very lousy excuse. I dont know why people will believe this. MRT works greatly reduced vehicle traffic to the Bkt Bintang area.actually I need CMMT to diversify my REIT portfolio, holding too much IGBREIT also do no good. And Berjaya Times Square diverted some lala traffic from Sg Wang too Tower REIT kaboom today...-3% This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Nov 5 2014, 09:24 AM |
|
|
Nov 5 2014, 09:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#240
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0524sec
0.79
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 09:14 AM |