Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Automatic door locks, Not comply with UNECE regulations
|
vincent_ng86
|
Feb 3 2014, 10:58 AM
|
|
I don't quite understand. So now they have removed the auto lock feature, how will it be safer for motorists? What will be the difference between auto lock and manual lock upon collision?
|
|
|
|
|
|
vincent_ng86
|
Feb 3 2014, 05:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ozak @ Feb 3 2014, 11:15 AM) It is matter of life and dead. If your car caught fire or accident, you can't come out on time with your blur or semi conscious. It also probably mechanism lock jam after accident. That the door can't be open. So which is more important to you. QUOTE(heavenly91 @ Feb 3 2014, 11:28 AM) But I can lock it myself. So that beats the purpose afterall. Exactly, this is what I meant. At the current state in Klang Valley, the first thing I do once I enter my car is to lock my doors. It will still be a challenge to open up my doors during emergencies if I can't open it from inside, isn't it? This post has been edited by vincent_ng86: Feb 3 2014, 05:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
vincent_ng86
|
Feb 4 2014, 09:35 AM
|
|
QUOTE(ozak @ Feb 3 2014, 10:37 PM) My car don't have auto lock. And I drive for 7yrs without a habit of lock the door. It is a Japanese car. So, do you mean that the auto locks are removed to discourage motorists from locking their doors?
|
|
|
|
|
|
vincent_ng86
|
Feb 4 2014, 01:19 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ozak @ Feb 4 2014, 10:40 AM) No. You can have a centralize lock at the driver side. The driver can lock/unlock all 4door manually. Not auto. My car is using this function without an auto lock. Auto lock put you and me in a lazy mode. Ok, then this falls back to my original question, what is the difference if the door lock is locked by auto or manual? You stated removing auto lock will be more efficient for doors to be opened during emergencies or accidents. If I locked my doors via manual/central lock, how does it provide advantage over auto lock in this case?
|
|
|
|
|
|
vincent_ng86
|
Feb 4 2014, 01:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(khusyairi @ Feb 4 2014, 09:49 AM) Save cost. All new honda models also dont have it anymore since last year. B4 that can set autolock using Honda i-mid. If not mistaken only KIA sell new models wt auto lock & auto unlock upon impact for all models. The laws only said cannot have auto lock features wtout auto unlock upon impact (which usually brake base- auto lock). This make sense. So the original regulation is to have auto unlock upon impact, to save on cost, manufacturers removed the original auto lock feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vincent_ng86
|
Feb 4 2014, 02:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ben3003 @ Feb 4 2014, 01:24 PM) if let say upon collision, everyone pengsan inside, no auto unlock upon collision, so ambulance come save u, but when arrive, cannot open door, window hard to break, or break liao risk of injuring ppl inside. then have to wait bomba come save ppl. this might be the logic. autolock is an important safety features too, it's retard to say "hey, dont be lazy. u should lock the door urself becos H brand car dont implement it and local car implement it." just that what ppl are prioritizing in terms of safety, and local car still has autolock feature, with unlock upon collision  Yes, I understand the lock part where it will be difficult for others to save people inside a vehicle after collision. The part I do not understand is how removing auto lock feature can make it easier for doors to be opened from outside. Friends/families and myself will manually lock out doors (as the auto lock feature has been removed) upon entering. Let's say any of us met an accident, auto lock or manual lock does not make any difference right? My point is, stating the reason of safety - for removing the auto lock isn't reasonable. This post has been edited by vincent_ng86: Feb 4 2014, 02:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
vincent_ng86
|
Feb 4 2014, 03:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(death_nite @ Feb 4 2014, 02:43 PM) which mean, instead of removing auto lock function they should instead force all new car in Malaysia to be equip with auto unlock upon collision instead. Exactly!
|
|
|
|
|