Model Kits Gundam & Mecha modelling thread V33, Gunpla builders assemble!
Model Kits Gundam & Mecha modelling thread V33, Gunpla builders assemble!
|
|
May 14 2014, 06:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
A dedicated MG MSV line? I can get behind that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14 2014, 06:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
May 14 2014, 08:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
Edit: /\/\/\ - Nightingale is a statue by fault of its design. That's hardly an excuse for Gundam Mk. III and GP04, both of which are already announced for this line.
QUOTE(General_Nic @ May 14 2014, 09:19 AM) That would be retarded on every level. Nobody would support a model kit line that only has worthless statues.This post has been edited by TaurusOxford: May 14 2014, 08:08 PM |
|
|
May 15 2014, 01:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(nazrul90 @ May 14 2014, 02:47 PM) seem like you never heard military plamo? you insulting the plamo community You know damn well that's not what I meant. Besides the fact, tanks and Warships aren't bipedal machines that are designed to mimic human movement. When I buy a modern Gundam model kit, I expect great articulation(at least as much as the MS design will allow for). Bandai making a new line of 1/100 model kits, only for them to be statues would be going backwards in progress.you think only gunpla is model kit? how about other mecha plamo? tank plamo? warship plamo? just you think it is statue it wont sell? |
|
|
May 15 2014, 06:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
May 15 2014, 09:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
New info showing up.
Close look at 1/100 Nightingale: http://gundamguy.blogspot.ca/2014/05/re-11...tingale-on.html Close look at MG Hi-Nu ver. ka: http://gundamguy.blogspot.ca/2014/05/mg-11...-announced.html |
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2014, 10:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
Neo Zeong's box:
![]() Yeah... |
|
|
May 15 2014, 10:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(onnylam @ May 14 2014, 11:50 PM) Probably the same reason for Nightingale and Gundam Mk.III: Bandai can't justify paying for MG engineering for kits that not many people will desire to buy. I think this line is going to see a lot of kits that a few hardcore fans want (like TV Wing kits for example), but Bandai can't justify putting in MG form. |
|
|
May 15 2014, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
May 15 2014, 11:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Godevil @ May 15 2014, 12:29 AM) Hi-Nu is the successor to Nu. so I thought Ver.Ka Hi-Nu should be derived from Ver.Ka Nu. But they looks so different from each other, seem not right to me... That was just a fanart. As for Hi-Nu, it may be the successor, but it doesn't share much with the actual Nu. Hi-Nu is actually 2 meters shorter than the Nu, and it has always been depicted as being bulkier than the Nu.See that the Concept Image in the teaser drawing looks more Ver.Ka feel than the display model. wonder why? not actual kit? |
|
|
May 19 2014, 06:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Jevin94 @ May 18 2014, 02:12 PM) Hi, I accidentally broke one of the pieces and thus i cant complete my model, any way i can find this piece? super glues doesnt work for me. Thanks a lot. A picture would be helpful. Gunpla builders are THAT nerdy that we know what individual parts are by their runner number.Part H2(2)of MG Gundam RX-78-2 ver3.0 p/s: first timer here, 😁 |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0319sec
0.27
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 12:39 AM |