Leaderboard updated 

Did you run on stock? If you tweak abit you could break the 1k barrier. 

Yes, Waiting for Quad R9 290X or 780 Ti

Just for Info: I'm using Kill o Watt to measure power draw and it seems like my rig runs out with 1383 Watts power.

Guess I should try this out too. 

Hey guys, there's a need of change in the submitting the results, why don't we just submit like shepard did:



Therefore, there's no need for submitters to provide the core/mem clocks manually because it already stated in the result, save time for both of us.
Not to mention, to let others have a peace of mind that the core/mem clocks are legit. A win win solution no?

Well that's new, haven't seen or encounter that kind of issue before, does it affect your score?

same here

only memory clocks

and a seriously unrealistic one too

Something is off there.. your card throttling? 

I believe your scores are still ok, not that far off from my slightly overclocked GTX 760, running at 1006 MHz stock. But your minimum framerate is a bit on the low side though.

Yagami5159 My new entry for my GTX 760 at 1600 x 900 resolution.

There. Nice score already what. I think increasing the fan speed enables the boost clock to be sustained for longer periods of time.

What is your max boost clock observed? Mine goes around 1149 MHz.

Probably this is where custom cooling comes into the picture. My boost clock speed tends to stay consistent throughout the testing. Temperatures range just below 68C at auto fan settings.

But your finding is very interesting. I thought that since my card has a slightly higher base clock, it should have a higher max boost clock speed compared to a reference clocked card. Perhaps in my free time, I will try to tune the fan profile to see if the max boost clock speed got increase or not.