aiming for top 5 only , 290X-Tri-X at 1200/1500

900p


1080p


This post has been edited by shepard: Apr 11 2014, 12:04 PM

yeah, max it can go was 1650MHz and score still going up at this speed. Tried 1690MHz(Max in AB) and it'll crash. So I guess 1650MHz is the max since we cant increase memory voltage.

yup, please check 1080p single GPU between me and Acap score...acap score suddenly increase from 1589 to 1596 .
Anyway nice job TS, so when do you plan to open 1440p/1600p leaderboards? If you don't have a plan for that then let me do the job

weird coz I saw his early post scored 1589..well nvm maybe he did rerun the bench and got better score afterward..looks like I've to beat this score to be on top 5 1080p lol. If he OC his card then no chance already haha

ok suicide OC at 1220/1500


This post has been edited by shepard: Apr 16 2014, 02:49 AM

Bro, I highlighted this since earlier age of this thread already and ask you to change the rule so that all submitters must follow the SS that I've done ONLY. This is because we can see in that SS whether graphics quality has been compromised either thru CCC or NV ctrl panel setting or whatever methods to achieve higher score.

I've ran multiple tests already even at higher core clock and yes unseen83 score is insanely unbelievable and not making any sense at all..can check back my previous comment on his score last time.

check out the graphics on your 2nd attachment bro, its clear to me that tessellation level wasn't at "Extreme". Please open up your CCC and check this area..should be the same as mine below:
edit: My score at same setting as yours only 55fps+ so 12fps different using same GPU at stock, same driver and same OS isn't right at all.



This post has been edited by shepard: Apr 26 2014, 08:23 PM

not a bad score, it's about the same as mine which perfectly makes sense because mine was 55.1fps. But you should just leave it to AMD optimize instead and no need to set to x64, Application will do the rest and for this case Heaven 4.0 extreme tessel will kicks in which I believe equal to x64 tessellation level.

cstkl1 was right, our 290x score much2 lower than 780ti because of tessellation in this benchmark. It'll be different though when gaming so nothing to feel bad bro...290x tri-x is still one hell of a card, at least for now

Retracted, malas nak layan



This post has been edited by shepard: Apr 29 2014, 10:57 AM

GTX 980 @ 1390/1900MHz
Boost clock: 1513MHz



1370/1890MHz
Boost: 1496MHz


This post has been edited by shepard: Oct 6 2014, 05:50 AM

Yes its reference card, wow 2000MHz Mem ..will push mine as well now

Clock: 1390/2000MHz
boost: 1516MHz
Score: 1946 / 77.2fps



This post has been edited by shepard: Oct 6 2014, 01:44 PM

Both maxed out in MSI-AB, voltage +87mV and power limit 125%

Last submission for single GTX 980 @ 1080p
Boost Core Clock: 1567MHz
Memory Clock: 2000MHz
Base Core Clock: 1403MHz

Its just aftermarket cooler , my previous score was from a reference 980 and this one is G1 Gaming 980 which Gigabyte guarantee on its OC potential due to their "GPU Gauntlet Sorting" for all G1 cards, I even saw a review where this card can be pushed even higher(200++MHz) where I can only maxed out up to 180MHz core without any crashing etc.. but overall its a very nice card, but sadly even a single highly OC'ed 980 still not powerful enough for 4k gaming

Thanks, yeah agree with you. A reference 980 more than capable to satisfy our current gaming needs up to wqhd res+ultra setting+AA . Last time I ran heaven with 344.75 whql driver and scored much lower than this(same clock), but now with latest 347.25 driver seems like Heaven score increased quite significantly..maybe you can try it also

GTX 980 G1 x2 in SLI
1567MHz core (boost)
2000MHz Mem
score: 3736



This post has been edited by shepard: Feb 12 2015, 12:33 AM

SLI is more than enough for now I think, and of course no more budget

GTX 980 Ti Reference
Core (boost) : ~1440MHz
Memory : 2001MHz



This post has been edited by shepard: Jul 3 2015, 04:05 AM