BitComet user here.. v.70
last time used the .72, but getting slower connection than .70...
P2P BitComet Thread, Latest:0.99, info at 1st post
P2P BitComet Thread, Latest:0.99, info at 1st post
|
|
Dec 2 2006, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: SS15 Subang Jaya |
BitComet user here.. v.70
last time used the .72, but getting slower connection than .70... |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2006, 11:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: SS15 Subang Jaya |
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Dec 18 2006, 09:28 PM) Is this true?Can I ask how you know about this? Please share ur knowledge I am using 65432 port, though I feel this is stable enough.. hmm... maybe later i try to change my port number and see whether got any difference or not... |
|
|
Feb 12 2007, 10:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: SS15 Subang Jaya |
it's been a long time since i go to this thread...
is .79 really as good as the .70 ?? hmm.. should try it then... so .84 really not as good as the .70 or .79 ar?? |
|
|
Mar 3 2007, 08:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: SS15 Subang Jaya |
hoah...
I tried to use the .79... previously used the .70 and now reverting back to .70 since: takes less RAM, and I think i prefer the simplicity of it... |
|
|
Mar 9 2007, 10:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: SS15 Subang Jaya |
but then iianm the versions after .80 is not as 'good' as .70 rite? as in:
- download speed - stability - especially the changes in context menu the context menu @ .79 itself is a bit more complicated than .70 imo.. .70 seems easier to use... QUOTE(tan_pang @ Mar 4 2007, 08:34 AM) |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0452sec
0.67
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 02:50 PM |