using bitcomet 0.86 now. 4 testing purpose only.
fast, less memory sucker than 0.85 but still eat² lot memory.
btw, will test for 1 day, I think the main problem still memory management.
EDITED: so far, bc.86 awsome. it's recommend to use this version to bt for at most 10 torrent at the same time, any higher number will result your memory will be eaten by bc.86 like hell.
5 <= : processes was stable, can use for very long time, maybe ++24h?Anyone want to test?
6 - 10 : most recommend even if bc.86 seems to eat memory, but not like he very hungry for it. sometimes the memory used for torenting will be returned. GooD BoY.
11 - 15 : can stay torrenting for ±7 hours for 512mb ram users.
16 - 20 : will eat memory as much as he can. well, I did test 18 processes (
4 dl; 14 up) simultaneously and 4 ½ hours later it crash due to lack of memory available for bting.
mine only 512mb dual-channel.
1024mb will give you quite a break for this much bt simultaneously.
20 > : BC.86 IS EATING YOUR MEMORY LIKE HELL!!!
CONCLUSION: reliable, fast and no problems like bc.85. and no such flashgot rival (i'm using firefox add-on). One problem is, bc.86 hardly return memory used after closing it...meaning if already use 1.5Gb, it'll stay like that for quite sometime b4 memory usage start to reduce which is in contrast with bc.85 who once close, memory usage will start reduce immediately.
Can connect to international tracker at 25kb/s-35kb/s with 3 seeder and 14 peers.
If more seeder can reach full speed. Recommend to make use of cFosSpeed and BTEngine latest version for best performance without the need of port forward.
This post has been edited by Invince_Z: Apr 8 2007, 11:54 PM