I am NOT surprise when you say 200++ employee. But when you said 200++ mgmt level staff, thats weird. You seldom hear a local company having 200++ mgmt level staff. Thats too inefficient. You can have about 50 mgmt level staff managing about 500 employee BUT you wont hear a company having 50 mgmt level staff managing 100 employee. IF this happen, it means something is wrong.

I come from a company where we only have about 20++ mgmt staff handling more than 300 staff. When I said Management Level, its all those Head of Department and above.

Unit Head reports to Head of Department
Head of Department reports to Head of Division
Head of Division reports to CEO

i think he shouldve said senior-level management