Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> I only date men who read 2 books a week, by NXJ

views
     
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 08:38 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
hi ts, does research journals count? tongue.gif
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 09:23 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(NXJ @ Jan 16 2014, 09:23 AM)
Son, I'm disappointed
*
answer me la.
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 09:28 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(izaydi @ Jan 16 2014, 09:26 AM)
I everyday read science journal.sad life as researcher.
*
i feel you, bro.
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 10:28 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(NXJ @ Jan 16 2014, 09:33 AM)
Title of the most recent journal?
*
do you mean the one that I wrote or the one that I recently read?

the most recent article that I've read was Impact of instrument error on the estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity in population-based surveys.

for the one that I wrote, pm me for details.

QUOTE(izaydi @ Jan 16 2014, 09:37 AM)
u in this field too.? cry.gif 
neuro, biochem , genetics...
*
yes. but different from your field la. mine is nutrition.
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 10:43 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(NXJ @ Jan 16 2014, 10:38 AM)
Sample size of said study?
*
3474 Norwegian child from 127 primary schools.
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 11:07 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(NXJ @ Jan 16 2014, 10:45 AM)
What was the error, then? Inability to determine what qualifies as obesity in children?
*
the stadiometer error that can result in higher variance and wider distribution of graph.

I don't really get what you're trying to ask in the second question though.
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 11:22 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(duckoil @ Jan 16 2014, 11:07 AM)
dun meet emino.....ahhh his a weirdo smile.gif

kampung2005 is is cute....

sickx = motor geo guy ?
*
lolwut

QUOTE(NXJ @ Jan 16 2014, 11:10 AM)
Just a cheap shot at their self proclaimed proficiency in humanity tech

So as a result the national policy for children healthcare was misguided resulting in unfavorable outcome

Interesting though they all seem fine to me as compared to American counterparts
*
surely they don't do their national policy based on this study alone? the main objective was to find how the inaccuracy in measurement can effect the outcome result, not to find out the prevalence of obesity.

and in what way did you compare the result to the Americans? the prevalence of obesity?
sickx
post Jan 16 2014, 11:41 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,232 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(NXJ @ Jan 16 2014, 11:33 AM)
This study was to prove the error in previous studies

Which I believe did affect the decisions in policy making, hence the impact bit of the error

Otherwise this study would have another title

Yes, though I'm biased when it comes to fat American kids with obnoxious attitude so I shouldn't be taken seriously when I say they should all die
*
they did mentioned that they've corrected the measurement using the correction values post-hoc, hence, minimizing the error.

yeah, I do agree. I don't think there's any possible way to compare obesity prevalence with the Americans. they always have the highest.
« Next Oldest · The Museum Of Kopitiam · Next Newest »
 

Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0339sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:49 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.