Now that SG can get AESA, we might get super hornet with aesa too. From what i understand from reading around, SH is not attractive for MY if no AESA included in the deal.

What??? Frigate for humanitarian mission?

i know..i know..just my strategy..lel..but if this dispute still not settle, then when will any of us (countries that claims sovereignity in the islands) going to explore the rich natural gas and petroleum in the spratlys? 

yes i see the purpose..but what to do if the civilian who become the minister doesn't really voice out the military opinions and requests to the parliament? 
pity to the soldiers like LTZ dun get new uniform..hehe 

I cannot brain why cannot get russian parts. Vietnam and cambodia are our closest neighbors to use those helicopters.

Also there would be transfer of technology, the russians are willing to do so. We can even opt to pay via commodities like what we did with our MiG-29s last time.

It is normal for helicopters to crash. Ya think the blackhawk got very good service record ah? In Afganistan, several blackhawks crashed and they were not even shot at.

problem with US is to get parts is alot of paperworks even though the parts is available
Alot of background check and alot of WHY WHAT HOW etc?

europian? Nak kasi duit, here you go

aiya so what? T-84 is a derivation copycat of the russian T-82 right?

i maybe wrong but was this the same tanks that russia used during the grozny incursion? In which hundreds of russian soldiers was killed and tanks destroyed by mere RPGs?

Any tank other than those that use the british chobham armor are useless. Tanks need to withstand shape charges. Russia or ukraine are not so advance in this area, relying on expensive reactive armors. Thats why in syria so many tanks were destroyed by mere RPG used by the FSA.

I not sure if these tanks use the new russian composite armor but like i said the best armor is the british chobham armor use by Challenger, Leopard, M1 tanks.

nope documentary on the new t-90

memang from last time russion design their tank small and fast. The main purpose of auto loader is for fast shoot, reload and shoot again, Basically tank machine gun

Crew russion no need worry, dia ada banyak orang boleh mati andf alot of tanks to spare any way

if for the purpose for training and establishment, why not
but deep inside me still thinks that we wanted the Royal Marine doctrine rather then US Marine
a specialize force rather infantry unit.

because once we take the US item, we need to mold our style with theirs.

And the same guy just also posted this
One word, impossible
Astute-class nuke sub? wet dream tahap heckline

nowadays tank still use 105mm?

You get invited?