Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

18 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Your Home Theater Setup.. v2, Let's share..

views
     
SSJBen
post May 11 2021, 05:15 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(belialjo @ May 11 2021, 04:32 PM)
Center channel is placed right in front of TV, which i think should b its ideal place, no? Or do you mean there are center channel specific settings? I thing i noticed is that using EXTSTEREO effect, the center channel is louder compared to the left/right channels, which is why im using that effect.
*
Yes in front of the TV is correct, but I'm pretty sure that it's still compromised by the positioning of it.

1) Is it at the edge of your console table?
2) Is it titled upwards so that the tweeter is at ear level when you sit down?
3) What is the crossover set to for the center channel?
4) EXTSTEREO simply means all speakers are playing a 2.0 signal, you are no longer playing a 5.1 soundtrack. The center is louder because you didn't level match them.
SSJBen
post May 13 2021, 02:19 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(belialjo @ May 11 2021, 11:25 PM)
1) It is not at the edge of my console table, but slightly to the left of the TV, not directly center. Because my TV stand is quite short, and when i put it dead center, it blocks the TV receiver signal.
2) No it is not tilted. The speaker is directly facing me when i sit down.
3) I'm a noob at this crossover thing, do you mean the cable or setting? Either ways, i did not set or change anything.
4) Noted.

I tried adjusting the speaker channels individually, i increased left/right to 3db & center to 2db, seemed to help a bit. Is there a recommended db for these?
*
1) There then, is your problem. Not only is it off center, the edge of the table is also causing refraction issues for the center channel because it acts like like reflection point.

2) The tweeter should be at your ear level when you sit down. This is important.

3) Crossover is the setting of a point where your speaker crosses lower frequencies it can play well to the subwoofer. A good starting point is usually 80hz, but depending on room and speakers you may want to increase it further.

As for @bolded
That's not the way to level match. In order to level match, you need to have an SPL meter (or use your phone if you want, don't expect accurate results of course) and you sit at your main listening spot. Then you set the volume to 0db, play a pink noise (most receivers has an option to enable pink noise) and check the SPL. All speakers should be reporting 75db, if one isn't you either increase or lower it until it is. This includes the sub as well. After all your speakers are 75db, you can then add 1-2db to your center channel and another 3-6db on your sub. This is the easiest way for beginner to get their speakers playing properly.
SSJBen
post Jul 2 2021, 03:13 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(siauann @ Jul 2 2021, 12:55 PM)
user posted image

hi all,
just a quick advise from sifu sifu here.
this is my living room sketch. room size is 7.2m L x 6.1m W.
i have trouble finding a sweet spot for my sub woofer. location place no. 1 (blue square) - the bass is too weak. location place no.2 (blue square) at the corner wall - the bass is too boomy.
avr used - denon x1300w.
sub - yamaha ns-sw300

any advise can be shared? newbie in this world of HT.

thanks a lot
*
user posted image

Red - try either of those placements.
Green - potential dual sub placement.

Unfortunately (well fortunate if you ask me), you actually need multi subs to cancel out the waves that is causing the nulls and peaks in your room. The real issue is the size and shape of your room, it is neither a real rectangle nor is it big.

You will also need a calibrated mic and REW to see what the actual issues are in your room.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Jul 2 2021, 03:14 PM
SSJBen
post Jul 2 2021, 04:16 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(siauann @ Jul 2 2021, 04:04 PM)
thanks for the suggestion. dual sub sounds interesting. but i am not ready to do dual sub setup yet  biggrin.gif
the other placement on the back seems good but its a bit of headache for me on the long woofer cabling and power socket. i will try with the other location on the wall opposite the windows first.

yes u are right. the size and shape of my room. it is actually not a dedicated room but the main living hall of the house  biggrin.gif
*
My experience and opinion is that dual subs (or more) is one of the top 3 most important things to have if the room is not of a symmetrical shape and the listener has multiple seat locations (like you do). A second sub should definitely be in your next upgrade path.
SSJBen
post Jul 2 2021, 04:45 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(siauann @ Jul 2 2021, 04:20 PM)
thanks for the experience sharing. really appreciate it. at least i know in mind what will be the next step.
also for dual sub, is it necessary to have a same sub? different sub can do?
*
You can use different subs if you want, but you will need to gain match them. Not very complicated to do, just requires you to put the sub in your first preferred location, set the gain on sub 1 to something you desire then put sub 2 at the same location and match the precious sub'e gain. You will need a SPL meter to verify that their output volume is the same. After that place sub 2 at its intended 2nd sub location. Then you have to time align them by setting the delay on the sub that is farthest away from you. That said, if you don't have measurement tools like a calibrated mic and REW then it's basically impossible to achieve.

Most people will just use the same subs because that way you don't actually have to gain match, you just level match them instead which is much more straight forward.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Jul 3 2021, 04:27 PM
SSJBen
post Jul 8 2021, 01:08 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(GuyB @ Jul 7 2021, 03:53 PM)
Hey guyz...what’s the best way to set up a Blu-Ray player. There are 2 HDMI ...one for video and one for Audio. Should I connect the video direct to the TV and the audio separately? Or is the 1 HDMI setup sufficient, via the receiver, and then to the TV?

I only have a 3.1 or is it 5.1 setup. Two stand speakers, centre speaker and subwoofer. Will do the Dolby Atmos later when I upgrade the receiver.

Thx
*
You can do it either way, it's up to you.

I personally like to simplify to as little cables as possible to reduce possibility of handshake problems. Just gotta make sure cable is properly up to spec, so if you're passing through 4k60 then make sure the cable is capable of HDMI 2.0 bandwidth (18gbps).

2 towers and 1 center + 1 sub = 3.1.
SSJBen
post Jul 8 2021, 02:18 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(GuyB @ Jul 8 2021, 02:40 AM)
If I connect BD player to Amplifier and then to TV, do both HDMI cables need to be 2.0 bandwidth (18GBPS)?

Thank you!
*
In that case they can be 10.2gbps cables (HDMI 1.4), since moves are only 4k24 off the BD player.
SSJBen
post Aug 4 2021, 05:46 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(heart strings @ Aug 4 2021, 11:00 AM)
don't get cheated by speaker stands. it's just a stand, some dealer or audiophiles will go and tell you how great a stand is but it's all bullshit. a stand is just a stand. as long as you can position the speaker it works just fine.
*
Stands do matter - to a certain extent.

Hollow stands will actually cause artificial reverberation, that could then be amplified by nearby boundary. Weak stands may also not be able to handle the weight of a speaker.

Of course, don't be an idiot and buy for some plutonium-infused blast proof glass stand or something.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Aug 4 2021, 09:42 PM
SSJBen
post Aug 5 2021, 11:57 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(heart strings @ Aug 5 2021, 10:03 AM)
lol. typical reply from so-called audiophiles. speaker stands are mostly for bookshelf speakers and generally bookshelf speaker ain't that heavy
most important is the speaker selection, that's where the sound comes from. not the stand.
*
Lol. Damn you're either stupid or a bigot, or both.

Sound of course doesn't come from the stand. Sound is REFLECTED from the stand off the speakers. Every object in the room is part of the sound, including the listener. Ever thought about that? No, because you don't even know how sound travels and interact.
SSJBen
post Aug 6 2021, 02:17 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(GuyB @ Aug 6 2021, 12:46 AM)
Guys...

I'm torn between getting the Rosewood speaker stands for around RM200 or the IKEA bookshelves which can function as stands. Note that these are for surround sound only. The IKEA option works out cheaper and I get to use them as bookshelves too! But they're WHITE! Total colour clash!

user posted image

user posted image
*
The important thing about surround speaker placement is the height and the angle of them. How tall are those IKEA shelves? Ideally you'd want surround channels to be 2-3ft above your ear while seated. If you're doing Atmos/DTSX, then the surround speakers should be between ear level and up to 1ft above at most.

My opinion get those rosewood looking stands and get them higher than 80cm.
SSJBen
post Aug 27 2021, 03:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(opjust @ Aug 26 2021, 11:05 PM)
Guys - it's been a while since i'm loitering in here. my 10yrs yamaha amp now died all of the sudden and since it has been 10yrs and could not do 4k pass tru. I'm thinking of upgrading. is there any recommendation for good 10yrs amp again.

my current setup is 5.1, not sure wanted to have atmos or not. quite satisfied with current setup but i probably need more clarity in the center speaker and ability for 4k pass through.

appreciate if you can point me to any preference that you might have. I'm just about to start reading again on all stuff, technology change a lot!!
*
Clarity in center channel has very little (if any) to do with what receiver you pair it with. Proper positioning of the center channel is the only way you're going to get clarity out of the center speaker. Besides that, if your center channel design is the typical MTM array, it's always going to have lobing issues when you sit off axis. That's simply the inherent design flaw, can't do anything about it.

Yamaha V4A is currently the cheapest entry in Yamaha's latest line up, but if you ask me it's quite overpriced at RM2.5k+.

If you don't need any of the fancy HDMI 2.1 features, perhaps look into the second hand market for 2019 models?
SSJBen
post Nov 26 2021, 07:00 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(kkthen @ Nov 11 2021, 09:33 AM)
I got one question to ask sifu here, especially Minidsp user. Is it audyssey LPF for LFE 120hz so important?  My friends blame their  av processor don't have this LPF for LFE 120hz setting. This reason make their audio system bass performance  become weak, even they are using expensive multi 15" subwoofer.  So they try to use the minidsp set up  each subwoofer crossover become 120hz to 15hz  with 24db/slope.  AVR speaker crossover set 80hz.  Now they are happy, bass become strong.  But I think this method look like they are not bypass their subwoofer internal crossover, even their already bypass with turn the crossover knob to max value.
Is it this method  correct way, nothing negative effect?  AVR crossover 80hz 12db/slope, minidsp  subwoofer output crossover  15 to 120hz  24db/slope.

After, I also find out many brand av processor like pioneer, yamaha , Sony, NAD, lyngdorf & trinnov.  They also don't have this   LPF for LFE 120hz setting.  This setting only appear at marantz or denon which got audyssey tuning technology.
*
If a receiver doesn't have an option of LPF for LFE, then it is automatically already 120hz by default. The manufacturer don't allow you to change it because it was proven in the pass, people confuse it with the crossover for sub. I don't know about Trinnov and Lyngdorf, but for Yamaha and Pioneer I have measured and verified that their LPF for LFE is indeed 120hz. I assume high end flag ships from Trinnov and Lyngdorf also adhere to the same value.

With a minidsp, if you are really anal about the correct crossover setting you actually need to measure with REW using the time alignment tool to figure out the average median where the main speaker and subwoofer(s) overlap. I will say this and a lot of people will not agree because their religion practices has taught them otherwise: 80hz is NOT the best crossover value, contrary to popular misbelief.

It doesn't matter what speakers you have in your room, you can even have true 20hz-20khz towers like a Sonus Faber Il Cremonese but it all depends on the room dimensions and where you place the speakers, sub(s) and seating position which will determine the best crossover point. For reference, I personally use 100hz for my LCR because that is what measured best and sounds best, eventhough for a long time I kept telling myself 80hz is suppose to be "correct".

Also yes, the crossover value on the sub should be increased to the point where it is much higher than any LFE will ever reach or simply just maxed out. If your friends do not want to disable the crossover on the sub, they will then be using what it is called "cascading bass" value. Unfortunately, without being able to set the LPF for LFE on receivers, you cannot properly fine tune the cascading slope. So unless you know what you're doing, just do it the standard way by disabling the crossover on the sub, let the minidsp or receiver handle the crossover instead.



This post has been edited by SSJBen: Nov 26 2021, 07:07 PM
SSJBen
post Nov 26 2021, 07:14 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(panafone @ Nov 25 2021, 04:46 PM)
Thanks for replying. I've been Googling on this but the results are overwhelming.

I just added the center speaker and ran YPAO again. I added it because I wasn't happy with dialogue clarity with just the fronts.

1) will try this later. Hopefully it's not the speakers.

2) I placed it beneath my tv and tilted up towards my head as suggested on every online guide and forum haha.

3) Not sure of the setting. Just used the automatic YPAO configuration with the mic that comes with the AVR. will check out the Adaptive Dynamic Range later tonight.

4) Do I do this by increasing the level? Do I need to restore the settings to default (before YPAO) or just add the center level?
*
1) How did you measure with the YPAO mic? Did you use a tripod? A boom arm?

2) How did you exactly place your center channel? A picture would be better to illustrate your issue. Simply tilting the center channel upwards doesn't mean perfect dialog clarity.

3) Is the crossover for the center channel set correctly? YPAO most probably set it to "Large". It should be set to "Small" with a crossover value from 80-120hz.

4) Before increasing the level of the center channel, check the above 3 things I said first. A properly positioned and calibrated center speaker does not require a level boost unless its sensitivity is much lower than the main L/R speakers.

P.S Not all movies are mixed the same way. There exists plenty of movies (even very recent ones) where dialog is either intentionally mixed at a very low volume or the actors just suck at talking.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Nov 26 2021, 07:16 PM
SSJBen
post Nov 29 2021, 05:32 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(panafone @ Nov 29 2021, 11:59 AM)
1) How did you measure with the YPAO mic? Did you use a tripod? A boom arm?
I used a tripod. I place it on my viewing chair about ear height.

2) How did you exactly place your center channel? A picture would be better to illustrate your issue. Simply tilting the center channel upwards doesn't mean perfect dialog clarity.
I tilted the center speaker so it (more specifically the tweeter) points directly to my face.

3) Is the crossover for the center channel set correctly? YPAO most probably set it to "Large". It should be set to "Small" with a crossover value from 80-120hz.
I did notice this. Have changed the speaker to "Small" and set the crossover to 100hz (arbitrarily chose the middle value).

4) Before increasing the level of the center channel, check the above 3 things I said first. A properly positioned and calibrated center speaker does not require a level boost unless its sensitivity is much lower than the main L/R speakers.
I did get an SPL meter over the weekend and set the levels manually after watching a few YouTube videos (Audioholics). I think it sounds better although if I try to match the sub level to the speakers it would be too bassy, so I lowered it to the level I'm comfortable with.

P.S Not all movies are mixed the same way. There exists plenty of movies (even very recent ones) where dialog is either intentionally mixed at a very low volume or the actors just suck at talking.
I think this is true. I find some movies better than others. Especially good are 4k blu-rays.

I'm gonna stick to my current settings for the time being and read/learn more about home theater sound.

Don't think YPAO is very good. Do other brands (Denon, Marantz, etc.) do a better job?

Anyways, thanks everyone for the help.
*
Point 2: Assuming your center channel is on a console table, is the front baffle of the speaker flush with the edge of your console? Just being behind by 2 inches causes diffraction and if you have it all the way back to the wall, you are also actually causing a phenomenon known as speaker boundary interference response (SBIR). What that means is that the sound (called frequency waves) are being cancelled by the time it reaches your seating position which can cause dialog clarity issues. The other issue is also the low end being amplified due to boundary gain which then clouds the mid range (the vocal region), again causing clarity issues in dialog.

Point 3: Like I explained above, the best crossover can only be chosen if you have a mic to measure its time alignment response. 100hz on paper sounds "good", but the ideal crossover may be lower or higher. You have no way to know without measuring. Of course you could just stick with 100hz and your ears will over time adjust to the response and it'll "sound good", just like how every audiophile came up with this myth of "burn in".

YPAO has never been good, especially when it comes to sub EQ. YPAO has improved over the years, but Audyssey is still ahead. This will never change until Yamaha uses finite response filters for YPAO instead of infinite filters. If you truly want to EQ your sub(s), you will need to buy a measurement mic (like a UMIK1), download REW (free), learn how to measure your room response and build a proper custom EQ with a healthy house curve which you would then export into an external DSP device like a minidsp 2x4HD.


QUOTE(panafone @ Nov 29 2021, 05:04 PM)
Just in case anybody else encounters the same subwoofer level setting problem as I did, turns out my spl meter is only A-weighted. You need a C-weighted meter to measure a sub correctly.

I'm not gonna buy another spl meter so I'll just set the sub by ear for the time being.

Wow, this home theater hole goes deep!
*
Most mics are not accurate below 50hz anyways. The idea of an SPL meter is so that you can get the levels of all speakers matched. The level matching has nothing to do with your overall system volume, because that's determined by your receiver.

People have this misconception that all speakers must be 75db average. Actually it doesn't matter what the average value is. You just want it loud enough so that it beats the noise floor in your room, which would make it mask any other noise (fan, AC noise etc.) when the EQ process is taking place.

SSJBen
post Jun 21 2022, 04:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(corad @ Jun 14 2022, 11:08 PM)
the cheaper the better since this is meant to be portable / outdoors so likely prone to weather or dropping

but for a main HT / AV room, if I install a glass cabinet directly opposite the screen (back of the room) with 7.2.2 setup , any requirements to watch out for ? Only thing I can think off is vibration, so glass needs to be secure
*
One of the worst things you can put at the back of the room (opposite of your screen at the front) is glass. Not because it would break but rather more crucially = glass is the worst surface due to how reflective it is.

Not only you will have to deal with nasty anomalies in frequency response, but you would also have to deal with glass reflecting the light off the front projection screen which causes glare. Glass is one of the dumbest things to put in a HT room.
SSJBen
post Aug 22 2022, 11:41 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(harvin6 @ Aug 17 2022, 11:43 AM)
Hey guys anyone running a dedicated home theater? what time of soundproofing did you guys do?

I was thinking of adding another dry wall with framing ( but thinking wood or normal aluminum studs) anyone have done it before?
*
You have to build a room within a room.

For the walls inside the room, I did it similar to this:

user posted image

Difference is that I'm not using R13 fiberglass, but rather Rockwool 38kg/m3.

What I learned is that I shouldn't have used double 5/8" gypsum wall because it made the walls too stiff, especially for a small room (18' x 13' ft) which created too much room gain for the low frequency response.

ALWAYS use wood framing btw, never aluminum. Low frequency will vibrate the hell out of aluminum frames.
SSJBen
post Aug 29 2022, 02:58 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ktek @ Aug 28 2022, 10:55 PM)
Ben sir, may i know putting rockwool & fiberglass inside wall.
after long term will irritate skin itchiness or not
*
Been about 2+ years since I built my HT room with that said construction.

So far no itch, rashes or any other kind of skin irritation. I think that only happens if you don't seal the drywall properly.
SSJBen
post Oct 12 2022, 03:35 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Angelpoli @ Oct 10 2022, 01:18 AM)
Any idea if i want to go for a 7.2.2 sound setup, what brand and model is the best to go for? The one that is most valuable for money. Budget 20-30k. Thank you.
*
How and what is your room dimensions first? It's critical to determine what kinda setup you should go for.

Example if you do not have adequate space behind your seating position, there's no point doing 7.1.2 if the surround back speakers are going to be 6 inches from the back of your head. It would be better to do 5.1.4 instead in that case.

"Brand and model" is a vague term. Too vague to give an answer to. What are you talking about in those terms? Speakers or receiver?
SSJBen
post Oct 12 2022, 10:25 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Angelpoli @ Oct 12 2022, 07:19 PM)
The dimension of the room would be 16ft x 20ft. But after doing all the sound proof wall, i believe it would be 15ft x 19ft. Its a rectangle room. Not sure the screen should be on the 15ft side or 19ft side. For this size of room, 7.2.2 would be better or 5.2.2?

I'm actually comparing between starke sound, klipsch and also wharfedale sound system with denon/yamaha AV receiver. Any idea which one should i choose?
*
16x20 is not a rectangle, you'll be dealing with a lot of irregular room modes and 2nd order cancelations.

Screen size is up to your decision if you're placing the speakers behind an acoustically transparent screen or not. If you aren't, then of course you'll have to lower the screen size to accommodate placing the L and R mains.

If you're following the 1/3rd couch placement rule, then you shouldn't have an issue placing the surround back channels to make up the bed layer 7.1 channels. To be frank with you, if you're only going to do 2 height channels then I suggest not to do it at all. It's kinda pointless at that point especially when Dolby Atmos track mixes for home audio is already pretty bad to begin with. I don't see why you can't go for the full 7.1.4 setup though, it'll fit fine in the room if you ask me.

Side note: there is no .2 in the channel designation of a speaker layout (i.e 7.x.2/4/6). The sub channel is ALWAYS a mono signal, not stereo. You can have a hundred subs in the room, it's still only a .1 channel.

Does your budget includes BOTH speakers and AVR (what about room treatments?)? Because if so, it might not actually be enough at max RM30k.
SSJBen
post Oct 12 2022, 11:37 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Angelpoli @ Oct 12 2022, 11:03 PM)
Thanks for the detailed information. May i know regarding the chanel thing, why do i see people mentioning their system is 5.2.2 or 7.2.2 when they put in 2 subwoofer? Did they add in anything extra since you mention it is always a mono signal.

The 30k is just for the sound system and also projector. I'm planning to just get the normal 4k optoma uhd35+ projector. You have any advice on the optoma projector or better projector recommendation? The budget for room treatment like rockwool and soundproof wall will be separated.

I'm looking at 120" or 130" screen. Probably will not place it behind as i'm not sure whether the fixed projector screen allows speaker to place it behind or not as i worry the screen will obstruct the speaker sound going through. I read on previous post regarding XY screen. Is it good or do you have any recommendations on screen brand and type?

Once again, thank you very much for your time and explanations.
*
It's a common misconception I think when people mention the number of subs in a channel setup. Because when someone has 2 subs, I guess it's in some way proper to say they have 5.2.2 setup for example. They use the number as how many speakers they have in the system, except that number isn't used for the quantity of speakers, it's actual definition is the number of channels.

Channels =/= to quantity of speakers. When you go to a commercial cinema, you'll see they have like 5 main speakers behind the screen, 18 surround speakers, 20 over heads and 10 surround back speakers and 4 subs for example. But despite that, do you see a THX certified cinema call it a 33.4.20 channel setup? They of course don't because the signal is still just a 7.1.36 (36 being the heights for Atmos). Similarly I have 6 subs in my room, it doesn't mean I call my system 7.6.4 ya know? smile.gif

I don't have enough experience with projectors in general though, so I'm not the best person to ask regarding projectors. I do know that Optoma UHD35+ is a pretty decent projector however.

There are acoustically transparent screens you can use if you want to put speakers behind it. For movies, it is the best setup because you don't have to compromise on the center channel (which is by far the most important speaker in a multi-channel setup) with a typical horizontal MTM design speaker. You could use vertical (which is the best way how woofers and tweeters should be aligned) MTM bookshelves behind a screen for no issues with lobing or phase shifts when listening off-axis.

18 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1261sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 09:25 AM