How long is the change name process in puspakom? Need to do inspection first at JPJ right?

No, conti cars are not more reliable, more of the opposite.
Sylphy should be a good buy.

My guess is because it uses CVT. Anyway among Japanese brands, Nissan RV is also never that strong in the first place.

Maybe better buy now coz car prices will go up soon due to the currency drop.
Btw for such size car, not worth it to buy just 2.0ltr version coz it's underpowered IMHO.

Mark X is an excellent choice but it's 2.5ltr, not 2.0ltr. Should never buy a d-segment size car with only a puny 2.0ltr engine, it's just hopeless!
Btw the latest model is like this, not the one you posted above.
http://www.mudah.my/2012+Toyota+Mark+X+2+5...PN-41872332.htm

Might as well just get FD2R instead of the FN2R. FD2R looks way much better and has many more options to mod the styling. Unless you just want to look more different/rare hence opting for the FN2R. Or go for the older Type R EP.

This post has been edited by 6UE5T: Dec 10 2015, 10:22 PM

If got so much budget, why consider lesser model?

Pros for Livina/cons for Innova:
- Better handling due to being lower and lighter, almost more like a station wagon instead of an MPV.
- Better fuel consumption (can get 13km/ltr real avg. combined city/highway).
- Cheaper, hence better value for money.

Cons for Livina/pros for Innova:
- Smaller space than Innova.
- Innova gearbox with conventional A/T is better than the current 1.8 Livina CVT unless you opt for the even cheaper 1.6 Livina.
- Livina is less powerful than Innova but also lighter chassis.
- Livina has primitive audio/entertainment system.
- No double blower A/C for Livina.

So in the end which aspects are more priority to you?

Audi TT got a few different versions that are sold here:
1. The normal TT which is basically just a VW Golf GTI in a different body shell with about the same 2.0ltr turbo engine spec 210-220hp and FWD layout. This is the cheaper ones. This is an example: http://www.mudah.my/2011+Audi+TT+2+0+A+FSi...er-42412383.htm
2. The older TT-S with 3.2ltr engine V6 NA (non turbo) engine 245-250hp, AWD. This is rather rare coz bigger engine hence not popular in Malaysia due to expensive road tax. It shares similar specs like the older Golf R. Example is this: http://www.mudah.my/Audi+TT+3+2+A+V6+Quatt...el-42929774.htm
3. The newer TT-S with 2.0ltr turbo but higher power 260-270hp and AWD. This is similar like the current Golf R in terms of performance specification. For example: http://www.mudah.my/Audi+TTS+2+0+A+TFSI+QU...+P-42975420.htm
4. The TT-RS which is the highest spec with the most powerful 350HP tuning and more hardcore/less comfortable setup. This one is way over rm200k.

Now there are a lot of TT pretending to be the higher TT-S version and trying to sell at higher price, for example they would call TT S-line, but they're not real TT-S so be careful not to get fooled. The engine and AWD is the easiest to tell the difference and cannot be lied about (look at how the engine bay of the TT & TT-S looks different, and look at the rear underneath to see if there's the rear differential transfer case of an AWD). There are other subtle differences also such as the automatic gear knob, speedometer & steering with TT-S logo so pay attention to these details.

Now another 2 door sports car option besides the TT is Toyota GT86 or Subaru BRZ but of course it's more spartan than the TT as it's actually a cheaper class of sports car and very spartan interior. Should be more reliable and easier/cheaper to maintain though.

Then of course there are the 2 door versions of BMW 3 series (325ci, 330ci, 335ci) and Mercedes (C180/C250/E250/E350 coupe) if you prefer German options.

Doesn't meet his criteria fo fuel saving though!

I'm currently driving a 2008 Mark X for almost 4 yrs now. It's a 2.5ltr V6 GDi engine with 212ps/260nm RWD 6 speed transmission, 0-100kph in about 7-8secs and top speed >240kph. This car is certainly much better than Accord or Camry especially in terms of performance and handling, so yeah it is a good buy if you're looking for a reliable D-Segment which can easily outperforms all those more common Accords/Camrys/Mazda 6s/Teanas. Maintenance is still comparable to those other d-segments, just slightly more expensive but not that much. Parts not that difficult to find since this car shares the same engine and gearbox as the Lexus IS250. Even many suspension and brakes parts are the same as well. It's a very reliable car btw, so mostly just regular maintenance.

It is very fuel efficient for the size and power that it has. My car can easily reach real measured average of 10-11km/ltr using RON95 in mixed city highway condition around KL. Achieving 600-650km on full tank in such mixed condition is not difficult, I could even reach 720-750km at some time before. If full highway, I can drive to Johor and back to KL in just 1 full tank provided I drive patiently within 110-120kph.

So do try test drive some if you're looking for a good D-segment car. If you want more info on this car, you can just pm me, I'll try to help as much as I know based on my experience.

Aiyo between those 3 choices Mark X is so much better that is laughable that you even compare them together!

For 60k budget, you can get at max 2006 car. If you're not used to choosing and maintaining relatively old cars then yeah, that's a concern. Anyway I still suggest you to test drive some.

This seems worth to check out if you live around KL coz this is a Sports Package (with black interior).
http://www.mudah.my/Toyota+Mark+X+2+5+AT+I...0816.htm?last=1