Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Have a Look Which logotypes Nice, Give Some Comment For My New logotypes
|
TSfansoption
|
Jun 27 2006, 12:09 AM, updated 20y ago
|
|
I Choose New Version 02 logotypes  Finally We have Choose it New Version 01 logotypes , This stanley branding co-brand of stanley studio. More details will coming soon ! Can choose which layout you like and comment it thank you! This post has been edited by fansoption: Jul 1 2006, 02:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
jayhan
|
Jun 27 2006, 09:07 AM
|
7 ☆ DSLR noob
|
i prefer new version 01, more cute + youth + creative  the S looks like macromedia flash logo i think the extra strokes for the slogan can taken off, like m, k, n, maybe can make the logo looks cleaner
|
|
|
|
|
|
X.E.D
|
Jun 27 2006, 09:17 AM
|
|
Hmm, the 1st new design is quite nice for a new identity, but I dunno how hard it is to deploy on other mediums like printed stuff, esp. in monochrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
etsuko
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:04 AM
|
Spaced out person
|
Only the Old, V1 and V2 are new logos.. V3 is the same logo as V2 but laid out differently..
Anyway, I find that V2 makes a better impression for me.
But in relation to branding, it depends on your target market and what the logo should stand for as your company identity.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSfansoption
|
Jun 27 2006, 12:46 PM
|
|
thank you etsuko, X.E.D, jayhan for u comment
|
|
|
|
|
|
dannytzh
|
Jun 27 2006, 01:34 PM
|
|
layout 4... coz you would want the 'make your impression' to be readable...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSfansoption
|
Jun 27 2006, 01:53 PM
|
|
thank dannytzh, you comment is right, thank for you info me
|
|
|
|
|
|
jayhan
|
Jun 27 2006, 02:29 PM
|
7 ☆ DSLR noob
|
the new set, i prefer design 01, maybe just the kerning between the impression's "ess" need to adjust a bit
the sans serif font's weight too light, and a bit formal, doesn't suit the logo well
hmm, just my opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
X.E.D
|
Jun 27 2006, 03:05 PM
|
|
BTW is that font from Linotype?
|
|
|
|
|
|
junkieG
|
Jun 27 2006, 03:21 PM
|
|
me go for layout no.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSfansoption
|
Jun 27 2006, 03:59 PM
|
|
QUOTE(X.E.D @ Jun 27 2006, 03:05 PM) BTW is that font from Linotype?  the font is no linotype
|
|
|
|
|
|
gen2hosting
|
Jun 27 2006, 04:40 PM
|
New Member
|
i choose layout 04 is cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
Femi
|
Jun 27 2006, 08:39 PM
|
|
I think No. 4 is better coz we can read properly... and the creative part is at the logo alone, so font type should be readable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
apek
|
Jun 27 2006, 08:47 PM
|
|
no 4..readable font..that's the most important thing..
|
|
|
|
|
|
prazole
|
Jun 27 2006, 09:22 PM
|
|
i like layout 1 its no problem for me to read plus it fits
i think layout 4 being readable is a little off the font type
|
|
|
|
|
|
karhoe
|
Jun 27 2006, 11:26 PM
|
|
Your logo looks like Macromedia products logo such as Dreamweaver but they are nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
zeist
|
Jun 28 2006, 01:03 AM
|
|
I pick layout 3, because I dislike the others typeface, look very cartoon/funky. While layout 3 is more like corporate typeface, so when people look at it, we know it is some professional site. The logo is kinda cool.  Layout 3 or Old Version.  , i like the old version too. This post has been edited by zeist: Jun 28 2006, 01:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSfansoption
|
Jun 29 2006, 01:28 AM
|
|
thank you for you all comment
|
|
|
|
|