Hi, I was visited Raytech yesterday and I noticed there is a brochure with prices for each individual Raytech tint for standard/large etc. Where can I get this information online as I was not given that brochure.

Noted, initially was informed the Centurion RX-4mil package with a 95% IRR for windscreen. After some negotiation was given free upgrade to a 97% which they used this term "Deluxe", but was told its another name for the Ultra 70. Was puzzled as I was not able to find a 95% IRR non-security tint from the website earlier, either 97% or 85%.

Was a little surprised when I got a call from Raytech KL that mentioned about RX-4mil comes with Ultra 70 for the windscreen at RM3100. But anyways already booked it with the shop yesterday, let's see how this combination pits against the V-Kool 70 that came FOC with the Teana in terms of heat rejection.

Good tint specs is important, but workmanship is even more critical in my opinion. Back in 2014 I went with Raytech as they were Honda panel back then, had some issues too with the workmanship and my windscreen Ultra 70 discolored after 2 years.

2 months ago just bought a new car and wanted the best available tint and decided to give Raytech another go, and unfortunately am disappointed with the workmanship

It was the Melaka dealer. Lets see what would Raytech HQ management feedback on my case =/

Faded tint should be covered in the warranty, at least for Raytech when promoting the tint to me. Faded and losing heat rejection is covered within the warranty.

Based on the website, 50 and 75 is the VLT. Lower number = darker tint thus more TSER in total. Personally I've sat in a car tinted with Crystalline TSER 50% versus the ceramic 47%... the crystalline performed very good for me. So this ceramic would be a little less in terms of TSER but IRR Is err 97% versus 61% hmm.

http://solutions.3m.com.my/wps/portal/3M/e...cts/Comparison/

Consider contacting Lord Gitsy if he can offer you better pricing.

Chip is outside right? Tinting is done inside, won't be an issue.

Intereting... the HO even better than Raytech RX eh... which model is it from HO? Next time can consider that too... I'm using RX at the moment.

Wah, this one is VIP car already should be quite dark inside haha...

No issue with Smart Tag... but I'm a little skeptical about it. Smart Tag is working based on IR... and if this tint blocks 99% IR... how does Smart Tag work? Different wave length?

Oh wait, its 98% (RX, Ultra 70) meaning only 2% can go through... so how does the smart tag works in this case...?

Lord Gitsy maybe can comment on this?

haverkamp looking at your product list.. your top range http://www.haverkamp-tinting.com.my/automo.../mt-70-ceramic/ will not work with smart tag too right? 97% IRR blocking?

This post has been edited by celciuz: Nov 14 2017, 04:22 PM

This is what I'm curious on... I have the Ultra 70 (98% IRR on the spec sheet) still able to go through Smart Tag (but I wasn't zooming past the gate la, slow but don't think until 5 km/h haha...).

Sigh, starting to notice lines appearing on my windscreen (Raytech Ultra 70). My other car has Ultra 70 too but so far no lines appearing yet, it was fitted 1 year ago... is it the recent batch have quality issue? Should not be workmanship since both cars done at same place.

Damn unlucky this round since my windscreen was replaced twice, first tint had very obvious lines (waves), then second one had dents on it 😩 current one initially I noticed a bit of lines but not obvious so I ignore it, then now seems more areas have it. My old Myvi last time install cheap Rikecool had this issue only after 4 years, this one less than 3 months only 😩

Maybe its one of the material used on the higher grade to achieve those specifications... but its still not that obvious yet so not gonna claim first.

This is what got me curious about, 3M Crystalline has issues with smart tag, but the Raytech Ultra 70 doesn't have... why tho? But previously I asked, Lord Gitsy said need to go slow... but I remember for Crystalline has to be like super turtle slow (like these wira going past a high bump LOL)..

Unless of course the IRR rejection is for certain wave length only... the 98% claimed for 300nm or something while Smart Tag running on another wave length perhaps?

Bring to HQ to verify?

If is particle, would have been there all the while.. if not noticeable wait until it becomes worse only claim la.

Check if there is dust in the bubble? If there is, it won't go away at all. If not so obvious then can ignore it la... mine previously got dust, but the dust was kinda huge ._. from far away also can see the bubble. So ended up replacing that side.

Ah crap, I'm using Raytech's PPF on my head lamp... hopefully won't crack like what you mentioned... Civic's led headlamp.. won't be as hot as halogen/xenon right.

Can't recall... but was pretty pricey... I think was RM600 or was it RM800