Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Insurance Talk V2, Anything and everything about insurance

views
     
zest168
post May 8 2014, 03:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(neshdgr8 @ Apr 29 2014, 01:24 AM)
Hi. I thought of taking UMR (ultra medic rider) from etiqa. When i read the brochure it stated there: exclusions  no 11)  which is-

War or any act of war, declared or undeclared, criminal or terrorist activity, ACTIVE DUTY IN ANY OF THE ARM FORCES, direct participant in strikes, riots and civil commotion or insurrection.

I am working in arm forces. When i told my agent about this, she replied:
Sir, tht is industrial practice. Must print in brochure as per bank negara requirement. If etiqa really didnt paid any claim, they will not accept any armed forces customers. And she mention tht etiqa has paid to families who has involved in lahad datu incident(armed foces)
So, i took initiative and call bank negara. They told me, yes, what written in brochure is true.
So, this agent is terang-terang try to con me rite?
*
If you are working in Arm Forces, the exclusion will take effect if you are injured while active in duty. However, if you are injured while crossing the road and fall into a drain or a snatch thief injured you, then you are covered.
zest168
post May 8 2014, 03:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(marketstore @ Apr 15 2014, 11:58 PM)
that doesnt sound right....
for eg if my yearly contribution is 3k....part of it go to the insurance premium and part of it go to the investment link....so if the plan get terminated i get the full refund 3k which i paid......
what if the fund goes down ....the insurance going to bear the lost and still refund me 3k.....so good meh the insurance company
*
The way the premiums are refunded are usually stated clearly in the contract, you may want to read it. Typically, for investment linked products, when a policyholder pays a RM3,000 premium they are first used to buy unit links at the prevailing unit price and credit the units into the policy Unit Account. Then the insurance charges and other charges are made by selling off the number of units that correspond to the total charges. Say, if total insurance and service charge are RM 50 and the Unit Price is RM 1, hence 50 units will be sold off to get RM50 to pay for it every month. Balance of the units are still kept in the account following the unit pricing.

When a plan gets terminated, all the charges paid so far will be refunded, in this example RM 50 plus the value of the units in the Unit Account at the prevailing market rate. This way the policyholder bear the investment risk (Profit & Lost) because unit price can go up or down.




zest168
post May 15 2014, 04:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


Good names or bad names of a life insurance company really depends very much on the conduct and professionalism of the insurance agents. All life insurance companies have both good and not so good insurance agents. As consumers, we have to have some basic understanding of what we are buying be it insurance or a car or a house. Never rely 100% on the person who sell you a product because it is their interest to make the sale successful.
zest168
post Jun 4 2014, 11:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(cybpsych @ Jun 3 2014, 04:28 PM)
got into a discussion with a friend, working for Prudential. he offerred me a PRUlink One plan with the following:

RM1,000/mth premium

PRUlink One (64yrs) + Crisis Shield (64yrs) + PRUacci Guard (34yrs)

RM500k coverage for life, TPD, 36CI, and Accidental Death (not sure if each 500K or combination of all)

Medical card
- PRUacci Med (34yrs) + PRUflexi Med (34yrs) + PRUmed (34yrs) + Enhanced PRUpayor Basic

RM2mil lifetime limit, RM100k annual limit
R&B: RM300/day, Zero Deductible
Hospital/ICU allowance: RM100/200 per day
PRUacci Med: assured RM2k
PRUmed: 2 units
Enhanced PRUpayor Basic: RM12k per annum

premium waiver: RM700 upon TPD or 36CI
am wondering if the coverage is good as well as the RM1k/mth preium is justifiable for the amount of coverage.

thanks al!
*
If I were you, I am OK with PRUlink One + Crisis Shield and PRUacci Guard, but check to see if the Crisis Shield accelerates the PRUlink One sum assured upon claim. If it does, then upon claiming any of the 36Critical illness, the PRUlink sum assured will be reduced by the amount paid under the Crisis Shield i.e., RM500K - RM500K = 0. If Crisis Shield does not accelerate the PRUlink sum assured upon claiming, then it is OK.

Otherwise, you have two options, (1) Buy a Critical Illness plan that does not accelerate the PRUlink sum assured upon claim, this will be more expensive in premium or, (2) Depending on how much you need upon claiming the 36 critical illness, and how much you want to leave behind upon death. If you want to leave behind say, RM200K upon death and claim RM 300K upon diagnosis of any of the 36 Critical Illnesses, then your PRUlink Sum assured can be RM 500K, while the Crisis Shield sum assured be RM 300K, this way premium is cheaper.

If I were you, PRUacci Med and PRUmed are really nice to have. What you need is a good overall medical card covering hospital admissions and surgeries due to both illness and accident up to age 85 or 100. Kiasu people like me bought one upto 100 years old, hahaha. 70 years old (or young) is really too early to terminate a medical plan and at that age you may no longer be eligible to buy another medical plan. So buy it when young.

Enhance PruPayor Basic and premium Waiver the premiums should not be too expensive, I will include them because upon diagnosis of 36 Critical illness or becoming TPD, the premiums for the policy will be paid by the company into your account, and these premiums can be used for purchasing the units for investment purpose after the sum assured for CI or TPD been paid to you.

Hope this helps. At the end of the day with the escalating cost of medical fees, we need to cover ourselves well with a good life and health insurance plan. Happy buying!

This post has been edited by zest168: Jun 4 2014, 11:54 AM
zest168
post Jun 12 2014, 03:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(cherroy @ Jun 9 2014, 10:40 PM)
Investment linked insurance is not giving back your premium that paid for insurance.

See, as I mentioned previously, still many do not understand well investment linked.

In investment linked insurance, your premium actually goes to 2 portion, one to insurance, another one to investment.
The money you get back is from the investment part (if, as there is no guaranteed how much the return will be).

Investment linked doesn't mean your insurance part of premium stay forever the same.
Just because your investment linked premium is the same, doesn't means the money channel to insurance portion is the same!
The investment linked premium at the same amount because insurance company allocate the ratio between the premium to investment portion and insurance portion accordingly.

Eg.
investment linked premium 1000
When started time,
900 goes to investment, 100 goes to insurance coverage
when getting old
500 goes to investment, 500 goes to insurance
even older
100 goes to investment, 900 goes to insurance.
*
Some slight amendment here, if I may based on my understanding about investment linked insurance.

Eg.
investment linked premium 1000
When started time, the first few years, not 100% of your premium goes into investment, of RM1000 for first year
maybe RM600 is allocated into investment converting cash into units (based on unit pricing at time of purchase), each month units are sold to pay for insurance charges, say if insurance charges are RM100, and unit price at that time was RM1, then 100 units be sold to pay for the insurance charges of RM100.

As you grow older each year, the insurance charges keep going up following your age. But that does not mean that you will have to sell more units depending on how quick your unit price increases. If 1 year later, your unit price becomes RM 2 and your insurance charges gone up to RM120, you will only need to sell 60 units each month to pay for the insurance charges. However, unit price may also go down when market is not good, this is when you have to sell more units a month to pay for your insurance charges.

Hope this is clear.

This post has been edited by zest168: Jun 12 2014, 03:50 PM
zest168
post Jun 16 2014, 01:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(Icehart @ Jun 15 2014, 09:59 PM)
Unfortunately, my AIA is not based in Malaysia. I called and enquired with AIA SG and it's been a month since I last heard from them. Thinking of making a trip to SG and ask what's going on but I don't know if it's fruitful or not.

Please advise.
*
Over the years you may have moved or changed your correspondence address, hence upon policy maturity, the Maturity Letter could have sent to an old address.

If you like, you can PM me your policy number, date of maturity and full name, let me check for you with AIA SG as I have friends working there.

This post has been edited by zest168: Jun 16 2014, 01:26 PM
zest168
post Jun 26 2014, 03:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(abhipraaya @ Jun 26 2014, 01:00 PM)
So, Prudential sent a letter today wanting to increase the policy premium citing the usual 'healthcare treatment have been increasing in recent years'...

While I can understand an increase (yes, we are aware since  we read the terms before signing up stating insurance companies can increase the premium when they foresee a need to do so,)although not being particularly happy about it, did Prudential consider:

1) Senior citizens and pensioners who are already paying very high monthly premiums.
2) Increase of RM15.23 per month (multiply that by 12 months and you know how much extra you're paying). Why not just increase it a little if you ever need to do so?
3) Being 'good enough' to 'offer' a new lifetime limit of additional RM30,000 with that increase in monthly premium. Senior citizens, don't be fooled by this 'genorousity',senior citizens do not need this additional life time limit as they are already old, instead, perhaps increasing the sum assured would be more useful.

Prudential's premium is relatively high compared to e.g. Allianz and it's coverage only mediocre.

People have different opinions when it comes to insurance, I'm not a senior citizen but my mother is. I am very happy to have chosen Allianz. Eventually, one day, Alllianz may also increase their premium (to be neutral in this argument, they did that in the past and they could do it again) BUT their coverage/plan/benefits give you the best value for your hard earned money IMHO, at least for now (let me qualify this statement) - but at least I'm happy to enjoy wider and better coverage with Allianz while I still can smile.gif.  Prudential is being faced with very high claims from it's user base hence their high premium.
*
Cost of insurance esp medical insurance has increased very sharply over the years. As we all know, insurance premiums are calculated based on risk pooling basis. Hence in order to maintain cost every policyholders have their role to play so that their premiums are not increased drastically.

Policyholders should adopt some basic best practices:-

1. Do not admit to a hospital if the condition can be treated as out patient. Of course this is not easy as we are not doctors, and also is it in the interests of the doctor to get you admitted so that you can be closely monitored. So, most of us will listen to doctor's advice esp the patient is our child. Ask doctor the severity of the condition and necessity with hospital admission before deciding whether to get admitted or not.
2. Show concern with the doctor on the hospital charges, scrutinize and negotiate with them on the fees as if you pay it from your own pocket. Do not think that just because you have a medical card, it is Ok to pay whatever that is charged because ultimately when claims experience deteriorates then premium will be increased.
3. Ask for second opinion on options for treatment, this is good for own health.

Medical insurance plans are great plans but policyholders have to do their part to ensure that the premiums can be maintained. Insurance companies are actively trying to manage costs of claims and this task is much easier to be managed if policyholders work hand in hand.






zest168
post Jul 7 2014, 12:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(rinoa_heartily @ Jul 7 2014, 11:32 AM)
1. yes, protection.. but if anything happen there will be some savings..
2. but if malaysia citizenship has already been given-up, i think IC as well already returned back to government, so how to claim without IC? maybe other supporting document? do u have client having similar situation?
*
For Life and CI, when you bought the policies you were a Malaysian and later on migrated elsewhere, as long as you maintain the policy and keep them in force by continuously paying the premiums, then you are covered.

The longer the policies were kept in force, the better. Before you surrender your IC for change of your citizenship, make some copies and get them certified by the insurance company counter officers and keep them for future use. You still keep your birth certificate which can be another alternative supporting evidence about your identity.

Depending which country you are migrating, if too far you may have some inconveniences of submitting the claim and sometimes ding-dong of requirements are very frustrating and time consuming.

Also depending on your policy duration and sum assured, if you are moving to certain countries where death certificates or medical reports can easily been forged, the Claims Assessor will be very wary about such claims, hence also be troublesome during claims processing. Cannot blame the Claims Assessor because they are not sure whether such claims are genuine or not because there were past experience of fraudulent claims from such places.

This post has been edited by zest168: Jul 7 2014, 12:39 PM
zest168
post Jul 14 2014, 12:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(Pisanggoreng @ Jul 9 2014, 09:11 PM)
Any advice for someone who / has:

1) poor health record (not really big issue actually, just insurance underwriters kinda exaggerate things) until having medical card etc rejected, and only death insurance permitted with big loading.

And

2) having a class 4 occupation.

Advice pls.
*
Questions:-

1. Are you salaried-employed or self-employed? If salaried-employed, normally they have group medical cover for you.

2. Depends what your poor health record is all about - is it reversible with lifestyle change? or will it get worse with age in general?

If you stated that it is not really a big issue, perhaps there is something that could be done to get you a medical card or a critical illness - with exclusion and/or loading. Unless in the eyes of the underwriter, there is something more.
zest168
post Jul 14 2014, 12:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(blackqilin @ Jul 12 2014, 01:24 PM)
I am planning to get a medical insurance for my 1 year old daughter.
Confuse with education fund/life+medical/medical card alone.
Need help

Thanks
*
As you already know that you want to get a medical insurance for your girl, then a medical insurance that is.

So depending on what you want for your girl:-

1. A plan that covers her medical needs from now as well as a fund for her education 20 years later?
2. A plan just to cover fund for her education 20 years later?
3. A plan just to cover for her medical needs from now onwards?



zest168
post Jul 24 2014, 01:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(3antz @ Jul 24 2014, 12:26 PM)
sure, am a male, IT job and 30 yrs old come august. thanks.
*
I believe RM200/mth or RM2400/year premium for a 30 yo male can buy you a much bigger sum assured than just RM12K.

As this is an investment linked policy as mentioned, that means a larger chunk of the RM2400 yearly premium goes into investment.

So question comes back to you whether you are seeking insurance coverage more or investment for the RM200 savings that you paid into the monthly premium?


zest168
post Jul 29 2014, 11:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(Matilda C. @ Jul 29 2014, 03:47 AM)
Roystevenung mentioned that the insurer may contest to the claim if the claim is ambiguos if it was within the contestibility period. Does that mean that after the contestibility period, if the claim is due to a pre-existing condition not declared by insured, then insurer still have to pay the claim?
*
Please take note that for a pre-existing condition, i.e., a condition that has manifested itself before the policy is issued is forever not payable.

However, on the validity of the policy beyond the two years contestable period, such condition will be reviewed on case to case basis. For example, if a person has mild hypertension before taking up the policy and did not disclose it during the application, and after two years make a claim, then the claim is not payable on basis that the hypertension was a pre-existing condition, at the same time whether the insurance company can cancel the policy from inception depends on the severity of the illness not disclosed in order to establish the intent of fraud.

This is because according to Sec. 147 sub-sec (4) of the Insurance Act 1996, it reads, "A licensed life insurer shall not dispute the validity of a life policy after the expiry of two years from the date on which it was effected on the ground that a statement made or omitted to be made in the proposal for insurance or in a report of a doctor, referee, or any other person, or in a document leading to the issue of the life policy, was inaccurate or false or misleading unless the licensed life insurer shows that the statement was on a material matter or suppressed a material fact and that it was fraudulently made or omitted to be made by the policy owner."

This post has been edited by zest168: Jul 29 2014, 02:55 PM
zest168
post Jul 29 2014, 05:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(Matilda C. @ Jul 29 2014, 03:51 PM)
Thanks for your reply, Zest & Roystevenung.

There is a news stating there was a son sued insurance company over death benefits. The insurance company denied to pay death claim of a mother who died of heart attack, claiming that she has pre-existing condition of anemia and did not disclose it to the insurer. Nevertheless, the death has nothing to do with anemia - it's due to heart attack. And the son stated the mother did not go for medical checkup hence did not aware she had anemia (not fraudulent undisclosure). Therefore, if the claim is not related to the undisclosed pre-existing condition, should the insurance company proceed to pay the claim to the insured/nominee?

For example, if the pre-existing condition not disclosed is hypertension, but the insured is diagnosed with cancer. Will/should the insurance company proceed to pay the claim?

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...death-benefits/
*
Life Insurance policy is a legal contract enforceable by law. As in any contract, it is bound by its terms and conditions, hence any breach in the contract will render it null and void.

Firstly, the insurance company must have concrete evidence supported by a medical report from the insured's attending physician over the diagnosis of anaemia. Whether the doctor explained to the patient about the condition or not is really between the patient and doctor. As far as the medical report concerned, it would be stated that a diagnosis of anaemia was made on ddmmyyyy. Unless the doctor clearly wrote in the medical report that he/ she did not tell the patient about the diagnosis, then the nominee may have a case, but I doubt so the doctor would write such medical report.

Now, the diagnosis of anaemia which was a pre-existing condition, but the insured in fact died of heart attack, which is not related to anaemia. Question is whether is this fair? Did insurance company cheat? Let's go back to the basis of contract.

The insurer issued the policy based on utmost good faith. However, the diagnosis of anaemia was not disclosed. Whether such non disclosure was intentional or not is secondary, the fact remained it was not disclosed. If such condition of anaemia was disclosed during application, would the insurer still issue the policy as applied for? In the case of anaemia, usually the insurer will ask for the underlying cause of anaemia, if such underlying cause was not found, they would have postponed the application until the cause is known. So, if this fact was disclosed during application, the insurer would not have simply issued the policy as applied. We may not know the final outcome because there are many dependencies after that.

Assuming the best case scenario, the anaemia was nothing sinister as the insured just recovered from dengue fever two weeks ago. Then the policy would have been issued at standard rate.

The medium case scenario, the anaemia was due to low iron in the blood. Hence, the insurer need to charge a higher premium and/ or impose loading on medical card (if any). The insurer counter offer this to the insured, depending on the insured whether to take it up or not, hence there are two outcome - accept the counteroffer or reject it.

Worst case scenario, the anaemia was due to cancer. Obviously, application would be declined right away by the insurer.

Therefore, as long as any material non disclosure affecting the original decision of the insurer in issuing the policy, the contract will become null and void from inception. Now, whether the insured subsequently passed away due to heart attack or even an accident, is irrelevant.

Bottomline is, better to tell all the truth, nothing but the truth on utmost good faith.

zest168
post Aug 19 2014, 09:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(Double_Ace @ Aug 18 2014, 07:00 PM)
Hi Roy, so confirm after 120 days can claim??? I did some searching & i found this thread after 11 month still cannot claim??

https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3123872/all
*
Waiting Periods and Exclusions are contractual terms, meaning to say that if an event falls within them, the Insurance Company has full legal rights not to pay.

As for any events falling out of the Waiting Periods or Exclusions, the company will still have a right under the 2 years incontestability clause to challenge the validity of the policy on basis of any non-disclosure of material facts at time of policy application. This is only applicable to claims which are made within the 2 years period counting from the date of policy issuance or date of reinstatement or inclusion of the benefit.

Under such circumstances, the insurance company will usually conduct an investigation on the medical history of the insured. Under this situation, they will not issue any letter of guarantee, instead the insured has to pay the medical expenses first and file the claim later for reimbursement. Of course, not all illnesses are thoroughly investigated. For example, if an insured is admitted to hospital after six months policy issued due to diabetes or hypertension, then the insurance company will normally investigate if during the application, such condition was stated as nil. It could be true that diabetes or hypertension may be diagnosed just after buying the policy but it could also be possible that there were diagnosed much earlier prior to policy application and during application there are questions asking about diabetes and hypertension which were answered as No.

Acute conditions such as acute gastroenteritis or appendicitis would have been paid out with a blink of an eye.

However, being ethical the insurance company should not take forever to conduct their investigation. They must conclude it after some time depending on how cooperative the insured is in providing the information required and how soon the attending physicians complete the medical report. So you need to constantly follow up with them to check the progress, otherwise you will wait for a long long time.

Bottom line is during policy application, be 100% honest and truthful with your medical conditions that you know. It is better to declare every health condition so that when claims arises, it will be as smooth as silk.

This post has been edited by zest168: Aug 19 2014, 10:02 AM
zest168
post Jan 29 2015, 11:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(supersound @ Jan 29 2015, 12:53 AM)
I know you are still trying your best to secure a business here, but my policy was bought 12 years ago.
For all the policies I bought and cancel before, I can conclude that there's no insurance agent(including you) that won't cheat and mislead to make fast money.
*
For older policies, Circumcision is covered if it is warranted due to repeated infection or balanitis. However, circumcision for personal hygiene reason would not be covered.

Hence, insured needs to read their contract carefully on the Exclusion portion to see what was written there with regards to circumcision, etc.
zest168
post Jan 29 2015, 11:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(Alexis~ @ Jan 29 2015, 10:18 AM)
question!

how do I calculate my cooling-off period if my policy will be passed to me by my agent once it's ready? is it from the date I receive from him?
*
As per contractual terms, cooling off period starts from the date the policy is issued as it is the company policy to despatch all policies the next day it was printed out.
The company cannot control or manage the administration of the cooling off period if it is based on the date the policyholder receives it because sometimes the agents are busy. Some may never get the policy if you dun follow closely with the agent.

So to better protect yourself from your rights in exercising your cooling off period, follow up with the agent for it, and on the day when you receive the policy contract, check the Issue Date stated on the policy against the calendar day, if the difference is very long or beyond the 30days Cooling Off period, get him to write on the covering Welcome Letter/ Covering Letter admitting that he delivers the policy to you on dd/mm/yyyy with his name and signature.

Then go to the insurance company and file a complaint. If the cooling off period is not your concern, then it does not matter as long as you get the policy.
zest168
post Jan 29 2015, 02:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(vandoren @ Jan 29 2015, 11:35 AM)
If you are confirm they are cheating, do you have proof or evidence?
There are successful case complaint to FMB or BNM.
Stop buying insurance is not a solution.

I'm not defending any insurance company but i feel that there's a need for insurance especially medical card.
It just happen this month... my colleague fell sick, went to General Hospital, hospitalized for 2 weeks, doctor said everything is fine. But he's still very sick, no choice and went to private hospital for 2nd check, diagnosed lung cancer 1st stage, within 1-2 weeks, 17K spent. Our company insurance max claim is only 25K. But he doesn't have a medical card, his kid still < 1 year old.
*
Yes, this would be a true example of the need of insurance so that we can get better medical treatments when need arises. Not saying that Government Hospitals are no good, they have the most complete facility and the greatest professors, however, they are also packed with patients from all walks of life. If you need treatment/ surgery, you need to be in long queue at Government Hospitals unless it is emergency. Otherwise, you go to Private Hospitals that could have more time to look into your ailments and quicker resolution to your sickness but it costs you a bomb.

So, medical insurance is a solution. Of course, in any product, there is limitation of usage/ coverage and things that are not covered under the premium pricing.


zest168
post Jan 29 2015, 05:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
220 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(conqu3ror @ Jan 29 2015, 04:45 PM)
There is nothing wrong with Government Hospital Doctor and the Facilities. But if you or relative ever visit Gov Hospital for outpatient and surgical, then you will know what happening and why people will prefer private hospital.

Let start with myself, I had accident sometime ago, leg muscle cut and badly bleeding. I admitted on Sunday, wait till Friday only my turn to operate. I was lucky as the uncle next to me who leg fracture had admitted for 2 weeks before me but yet to operate. (Probably my case are more serious then him).

My friend accident, both leg fracture, admitted General Hospital KL in noon, wait till evening only X-ray. Doctor said the waiting list for operation theatre are 1-2 months... doctor pointing there are other patients are more serious then him. His parent decide transfer private and operation are make immediately.

My uncle diagnosed with cancer, goto GH, the waiting list for radiotherapy treatment are 2-3 months. Are you sure the tumour/cancer are the same after 3 months or worst can the patient wait for 3 months? End up no choice he go to private hospital for treatment.

There are many other cases I have know about government hospital. Please note, my wife work in Government Hospital and I do know their operation and her doctor friends.

Those who experience with government hospital will know what is the problems. And that is the last thing we want it to happen.
*
Well said rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif Our Government Hospitals are really full of patients, we need more such hospitals but it is also not easy to say that if we need hospitals then just build as many as required. We need funding, we need doctors, surgeons, nurses, etc, we need land to build them.....so while giving the Government to catch up on this, we really got to think for our own preference of medical treatment when the need arises, what to do, where to go, how much can we afford, how long wait time can we hold ?

At the end of the day we have this forum to share and finally everyone is entitled to his/ her opinion. Like the Silver Surfer said, "Everyone Has a Choice"

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0610sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:03 PM