i shot this using PnS with window light and lots of flags to block and redirect n bounce

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.23, National Geography edition
|
|
Nov 28 2013, 10:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
wah all shoot watch.
i shot this using PnS with window light and lots of flags to block and redirect n bounce ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2014, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(avanpiper @ Jan 27 2014, 09:08 AM) I nearly jumped ship couple of days ago no one said u cannot own 2 ships i also got a mirrorless m43 panasonic setup...but still keeping my nikons. |
|
|
Feb 3 2014, 07:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
wow canon prices just increased...wonder if nikon soon to follow.
|
|
|
Feb 3 2014, 07:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 3 2014, 05:17 PM) ![]() My travel system, the Fujifilm X-series feat. X-E2, FUJINON LENS XF18-55mmF2.8-4 R LM OIS and FUJINON LENS XF23mmF1.4 R. by CY Pixels, on Flickr xD, technically still valid since shot by D800? hehehe. lens im sure you got some almost same focal range. |
|
|
Feb 3 2014, 11:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 12:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Pro3363 @ Feb 3 2014, 11:56 PM) i only thinkin of getting pana gx7...and wait for pre-owned D3s to drop even more...now rm8k also got...haha.the fuji x-e1/2 like weird leh for travel...lens still aps-c size so still heavy if bring 2-3 lenses. m43 can fit fx equivalent of 24/50/90mm in one small tiny bag |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 12:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 4 2014, 12:26 AM) Because the Nikkor lens I own at the moment are all FX lens, which means HUGE compared to the Fuji 23mm f/1.4 (big among Fuji lens). Well, I'm still using Nikon for my DSLR, just no longer for travel hehe. Nowadays go out with friends if bring camera way less strain on my neck and shoulders. ohh ok.Yes! Expensive >_< Nope, I own 35 and 85 among the f/1.4 primes, basically the 23mm on crop will replace my 35mm for travel go buy x100s for travel, or coolpix A...haha |
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 11:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(avanpiper @ Feb 4 2014, 11:02 AM) Wanna ask sifu opinions here, is D7100 heavy for traveling (2 weeks)? I'm thinking of getting just one lens (maybe 18-200mm VRii). Anyone ever use that lens? Lazy to change lens. its not heavy, but you will notice it after 3hrs or more.I'm torn between taking a dslr and a mirrorless. mirrorless is ok, but problem is your battery may not last 3hrs |
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 11:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(avanpiper @ Feb 4 2014, 11:52 AM) Oh I didn't realize m43's battery performance is weak. I'll be using for whole day when traveling so that's a huge nono. its not terribly weak, just not good compared to DSLR especially if you're gonna be out a whole day with no spares.m43 say 500 shots, D7100 can do double that easy. |
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 01:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 4 2014, 01:27 PM) I would lean towards mirrorless for travel purpose definitely. Smaller and lighter! Saves the shoulder ache from carrying the heavy DSLR setup, and its not so "flashy". ya i got a mirrorless also.That's the thing about mirrorless! Sensor turned on all the time while shooting, try shooting more on EVF to save on battery. Yeah, and the batteries are as pricey as DSLR ones! My Fuji retails for RM250 >( but travel, i just bring my fuji x10 |
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 05:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Feb 4 2014, 01:50 PM) then it's better to stick to original batteries, more expensive but lasts longer and more durable. stick to ori batts la.but I heard that some 3rd party batteries cost like rm50 but can perform as well as ori ones? m4/3 are getting so damn small now, look at the new oly em10 with 14-42, it's around the same size as gx1 (or even smaller?) but gives you zoom. 3rd party sure got some can perform like ori, but for how long? surely not as long as ori. plus for nikon, this might happen to u sooner or later. http://petapixel.com/2013/12/09/new-nikon-...several-models/ |
|
|
Feb 4 2014, 06:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 6 2014, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2014, 12:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 8 2014, 01:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 10 2014, 04:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 10 2014, 05:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 10 2014, 05:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 11 2014, 02:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0213sec
0.49
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 09:35 PM |