QUOTE(BTimes @ Jan 2 2014, 11:13 PM)
If you have staff, you have to pay them bonus and raise their salaries. All costs add up. But definitely developers are profiteering too.
Didn't contractors pay their men too? There is a payscale contractors to abide in paying low/mid/hi proficiency labourer and still they can really build at a low price in fact?
What are the payrise given to these staff, etc etc? Still doesn't justify the massive pricing, unless you have better justifications, why not just pour it out.
QUOTE(AmayaBumibuyer @ Jan 2 2014, 11:15 PM)
Where did you build your house? Bukit Beruntong?
And i suppose the condo you give example is in KL.
In the end it is always location location location.
Nope,its some landed around Assunta Hospital, demolish and rebuild double storey? am the designer of the house, and the contractor in charge in fact build such houses at these price? Oh the owner is a developer so he know the best way to squeeze you all dry, bound you all with banks for 30 to 40 years for way overpriced purchase and laugh at buyers.
I am not condemning genuine buyers but it is more on the mentality that had contributed much to the illogical price hike. As the matter of fact, most rich people I design their houses (structurally + infra) for built their houses at a much cheaper price. Build and sell small bungalows for 4-5 million, so that they got a bigger land to build a bigger house at the same price. LOL.
Location location location theory is correct, but not when properties became tools for massive speculation. I don't see any difference between stock market with property market collapse, when both is also about holding power. Simple logic.