QUOTE(jolokia @ Dec 13 2013, 07:58 PM)
According to this article the only way to reduce house prices is to build more house, to achieve 2.5 person in every house from our current 6.2 person in every house, assuming urban area to have even smaller family like less than 2, yes u need to get 1 for your parents, 1 for u & your spouse, assume you have 2 kids another house for them.
It is a question of affordability; no doubt for top 10% of earners, for next 70% earners may take a span of 10 to 20 years.
QUOTE(jolokia @ Dec 13 2013, 07:58 PM)
To reduce house prices we need more house, according to this particular developer write up.
When the supply is over demand, price will drop naturally and demand will increase to reach a new equilibrium.
QUOTE(jolokia @ Dec 13 2013, 07:58 PM)
According to REHDA the reason behind house prices escalating is due to huge demand & limited supply of land plus high demand of building materials, meaning the higher the demand the higher the price.
Current stock of 165,574 units took 20 to 30 years to accumulate. If there is truly limited supply of land, number under construction should be much lower than 46,098 (27%) units.
On paper, huge demand is undeniable, however a large portion of this demand is intended for subsell.
In the long term, surplus supply will be taken up if price drop sufficiently. The real McCoy is without price reduction, can subsell demand take up subsell supply in the next few years.
This post has been edited by icemanfx: Dec 13 2013, 10:29 PM