QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Dec 5 2013, 08:21 AM)
Dividends / "distributions"er.. may i suggest to U to digest the "distribution" (not dividends) portion again on page 1.
From your writings above, it shows that the concept of distribution and its impact (pros/cons) on a mutual fund has not been grasped fully yet.
As for NAV or price:U do know the underlying assets of a mutual fund makes up its NAV right?
with that concept, then further it as:
a. Fund A vs Fund B
b. both funds have different stocks and if share similarly held stocks, different amount or %
c. given (b.) how is one to compare NAV /price by itself and say one is cheaper than the other?
I've been where U are before - there are more things to absorb and use as we do & ponder.
Some things which was thought to be too theoretical / un-actionable earlier, will dawn on us why and how later

Just a thought

i think i get what you guys mean.
Between 2 different funds, we definitely can't say one is cheaper than another, yes i agree .
Distribution or split makes it cheaper - yes i agree too, but you know that is not what i was referring to.
What i was referring to in on one same UT itself and referring to the 'normal' price fluctuations unrelated to any significant underlying changes within the fund itself.
Example:
After you guys experts have chosen that fund to invest and you guys bought it at price say RM1.2876, and when the price goes down to RM1.2545, isn't this considered "cheaper" and i take it as good deal to grab now?
I mean this: Hwang Select Asia Ex Jap Quantum fund was 1.2876 on Oct 21 and now it is 1.2545.
Is this not cheaper ?
Thanks for all the comments, i know you guys are trying to help, dont take this as challenging your authority........., i can see you are all investment experts, very well read.