very sneaky move by the developer..

under the law, they are not allowed to forfeit let alone collect deposit during booking ..they can only collect upon signing of SPA..

so by making the buyers sign the last page of the SPA they think by doing this, its considered SPA has been signed and deposit can then be "legally" forfeited if buyers cant get loan when in fact only the last page was signed !

- my fren told me she was even made to sign it before the SA (as the lawyer was not around) when infact legal docs have to be signed infront of a lawyer

Report maa.. drugs selling also need a willing buyer and seller maa but why it is illegal.. but criminal

take sum civil case lahh.. u walk around times square ppl approach you ask you scratch and win... wahh win wor.. then bring to office in kuchai lama.. ask you pay governmwnt tax wor.. you pay and then you get mattress worthless bo value..

Ok bo? Willing scratch and willingly pay money.. 
answer is u cant.. report.. this is direct sales and misreprensentation.. forbided by law.. can repudiate and get full sum..

dis case leh.. report to housing developers if really forfeit ah and got ppl bring case.. drveloper license oso revoked lehh.. but I tink is gimick lahh.. like this sign on d spot if and pay 30k forfeitable..means market si peh good lor.. must buy diedie oso buy.. 

or it could be a genuine case as well that prop is so good and prime area.. not getting one unit sure regret..

Just sharing: my friend tell one..

rule 11(1) of housing developers (control & liciencing) regulations 1989 (HDCLR1989) prescribe 2 separate and standardize and uniform S&P agreements

SChedule G-landed
schedule H- high rise & strata type parcel.. condo.. flay and apartment..

SEA housing corp Sdn BHd v Lee Poh Choo - S&P Agreement contained exclusion clause 32 dat favours developers for late delivery.

"Federal courts(mahkamah persekutuan) held that housing developers could not escape liability with exclusion clause 32 late delivery.. which was void.. however if the clause were in favour of weaker party I.e purchaser the court would allow it"

so.. until and unless got ppl bring to court very nice movie.. confirm masuk newspaper famous lehh.. sure fat the lawyer doing it but then again developers are owayls flithy rich.. sap sap sui lah if got ppl bring case

和气生财。 if want to report better don't buy la. Like going to restaurant before eating start arguing. Workers split in ur food u also don't know la.

630 to 700 units?? thought all sold out except the 1216 sqft ones ?   

Sori for the short firm.
Left only 13a and 23a of the big unit. Haha pantang larang stopping berjaya 100% sales in 2 days launch. Should invite bomoh or choy san ma

as much as i agree to this practice, there're pros n cons i guess. unless u're cash rich or absolutely sure u're gonna be able to get ur loan approved, u're gonna donate RM30k to the cardiff fund should u decide to not proceed with the purchase if u're unable to get the required % of loan applied for 

Repeat?

http://youtu.be/zGOdjvVZQgQ

Boss, landed costs too high for the dev and land utilization in very prime area like Bkt Jalil isnt easy.

Say, if given a 100 acres land and built a DSTH 22x80 or 24x80, even they sell more than 1.2 mil each and sold out, the marginal is too less for them and the parcel of the land has higher future expected gain.

Landed development now will be go as far as like Kajang, Semenyih, Klang and Rawang for affordable cost, selling price and demand too.

   
jolokia hav problem with anybody who purchase property last few yrs till now.... 
Reason is because jolokia hav no steel ball to enter the market since last few yrs, and now prop price hav shot up much higher, where jolokia starts claiming the prop overvalue, talk abt affordability to majority, prop price to crash and etc........ Simply trying to explain why he didn't buy, not no steel ball to enter...... And hopefully more ppl come to support his arguments.....