Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 2ndhand 308Turbo or New Preve, which is worth it?

views
     
wayfeel
post Oct 22 2013, 07:49 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


Speaking of pug 308T , I JUST saw one white pearl one today, a lady of early 30s was driving it....Very nice...I was behind it quite long....NOT because I wanted to because it was jam the two lanes....and not that I was complaining too as the butt is quite sexy....the bonnet there got a silver like metal across it , horizontally.... and the way the rear light side it curves like the girl's hip. thats the cute part.

Turbo written below the 308....

Honestly....it does look like a sporty lady's car to me...I tot the car look great with a lady driver in it cuz the car doesnt look aggressive but sorta smallish sporty in a pretty one.



This post has been edited by wayfeel: Oct 22 2013, 07:51 PM
wayfeel
post Oct 22 2013, 07:52 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(acbc @ Oct 22 2013, 07:50 PM)
French car? Avoid unless u really a die hard.
*
Y r french car (or european car in general?) so bad meh? maintenance or durability problem?


wayfeel
post Oct 22 2013, 07:55 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(eric_ocy @ Oct 22 2013, 07:21 PM)
preve was lousy, same as suprima s, I mean the build quality, the plastic came off when my pants cling on the panel below the seat... and the door panel can move when I try to feel the material, although it's not hard plastic,  but I felt unreliable. More of is the car was too high tech,  you need to put your remote into the car before pressing the push start button??? WTF?? Then what's the point of the push start button? Why not make conventional key instead... The push start button is for our convenient to not look for our keys in our bag or pocket, but proton use old BMW tech which is put the key only press the push start button which is totally time waster... and one more important thing is the whole car is on electronic lock, which means there's no manual lock on each side of the door, and it can be opened by pulling two times at the door... worst part is, if the battery died, will the lock works??? The sales man even told me this car has higher hp than altis, and I thought doesn't our law in this country max speed is only 110km/h is allowed?  More is this car comes with timing belt!! Although it's proven quieter than timing chain,  but if you were the customer you want a timing belt or timing chain? Even 2005 myvi is with timing chain, have they complain that it's loud than a saga?? For that kind of money, I rather spend on low spec honda city plus the discount given just few Ks more than cfe preve... or cheaper than the SS. Just my point of view after looking at the car, don't pump me kao kao ya... XP
*
Man....I like your review. brutally honest and alot of facial expression there biggrin.gif . But it doesn't change what most other ppl think of the car but good honest contribution though. I hope ppl will consider what you say as well but let's all not be too dramatic here shall we hehe biggrin.gif
wayfeel
post Oct 22 2013, 07:59 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(acbc @ Oct 22 2013, 07:55 PM)
I have 3 units of Renault Kangoo and in 1 year, spent close to RM 30k just to maintain them. Everything so damn expensive and parts hard to find. Even halfcut also expensive.

If u clueless about cars, avoid every French marque. When there's a problem, u need a reliable workshop to help out.
*
then it is both maintenance (very expensive repairs tere, mate) and durability problem then....since it's rare, of course, its only logic that the parts r Much less accessible....even recon jdm also abit uncommon de and koreans too, what more frenchtoast....my fren had a inokom atos...i think that'll be his last kimchi ever....

regarding the durability, i think those frenchtoast r made for relatively 'colder ' climate country especially the car parts/componenet, so when u bring over/import to msia to use in Msia climate.....erm....go figure blush.gif
wayfeel
post Oct 22 2013, 08:04 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(megat89 @ Oct 22 2013, 06:36 PM)
Damn scary man.....good heads up for those who want to consider used pug 308T.

but is there a way to check ont he usage/durability of the turbo and the chain? and is chain so easily break one meh.... how much horsepower tis car oh....lol


wayfeel
post Oct 23 2013, 09:25 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(thedoc73 @ Oct 23 2013, 12:27 PM)
I am with you, Pogostik. I also own the 4-speeder 308T. Had some depollution errors during the warranty period but the parts was replaced by Nasim satisfactorily. I had a good SC last time which was KS Service. Maintenance actually is not very expensive because you only service the car every 10k km or 2x/year. Each service costs around RM400+ which is actually comparable with the Honda City VTEC 2005 which I previously owned.

As for the blog posted earlier, yes, there were some manufacturing problems in the earlier 308T which caused the timing chain to break. My timing chain is still running good, however there could be some problems with the chain tightener which can loosen and cause depollution problems. There is also a guy on the AW forum, Chargerguy, who is a Pug expert and he has helped me solve several problems.

The parts can be expensive if bought directly from the authorised SC but its cheaper outside. Chargerguy can also help source out cheaper spare parts. Overall, I have enjoyed driving the 308T. It's very stable at high speeds and the turbo is quite addictive. Like Pogostik said, if I were to choose again, I will still choose 308T.
*
How about the performance , is it comparable to 05 City vtec too?

At first , of course, I would immediately thought that the 308T can out accelerate the city vtec but after I came across 308T official 0-100 is 9.1s ....that reminded me of the city vtec launch by WKN was around 9.1s too...however, unofficial 0-60 time but it's close...

so I'm asking u since u own both cars
wayfeel
post Oct 23 2013, 11:02 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 23 2013, 10:40 PM)
The Honda City can accelerate 0-100km/h in 9.1s? Stock std?
*
I believe so. but I m not 100% confirm. To verify, you have to dig abit from WongKN articles. he did a detailed write-up on the city vtec.

but it should be stock cuz he was testing various launch mode with the car and the best one was about 9.s....if modding it would defeat the purpose ady.


wayfeel
post Oct 24 2013, 01:52 AM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(dtna7 @ Oct 24 2013, 01:03 AM)
No. Cars like Vios/City reach the century sprint in 11s-12s. If its less than 10 seconds, lots of cars no need to sell liao.

We would see so many ah bengs on the road with Vios / City intimidating others to race everyday. LOL

Some people are so imaginative that they think there is a VTEC "kick" in a City 1.5. Gosh, fanboyism has reached new level~
*
I usually feel very respectful for most of your replies....very 'professional' kind of way but you really sound funny tonight

R u so enjoice putting down ppl? "LOL" somemore

Mistake can happen. and it's nthg to do with fanboyism...you're so dead wrong on that and u think u r so smart by mocking. but i can honestly tell you, if i was wrong, then it was my mistake of wrong memory or wrong reading. i'll try to find that article back if i could, but still, im telling u that u r wrong of so quick to coming to judge/mock ppl to feel superior. exaggeration somemore...what new level. is your life so lack of drama you've to dramatise your reply when u can simply point out that i'm wrong then I go back to check on my facts , if I was not lazy but I think I should for my own sake so that I can prove to myself if it was my memory really degrading on me....


=UPDATES=

the below is written by wongkn in his article May 2005 and all the 10 tries of 0-60mph are sub 9s

""As can be seen, the Jazz 1.5 VTEC returned quite unexpectedly good results, to me at least. It consistently did the 0-60mph run at a time of between 8.7 to 9.0 seconds for an average of just above 8.8 seconds !! This was really astonishing especially at the time I was doing the runs. By comparison, the 'reference' cars in the mid-sized and full-sized 'sports-sedan' segment, the Civic 2.0 i-VTEC and the local Accord 2.4 i-VTEC returned averaged times of 8.5 and 8.6 seconds respectively, not a lot faster than what the Jazz did !

This optimum acceleration rate and lack of gearshift are the 2 key factors to the great time of 8.8 seconds for the 0-60mph run."""

http://asia.vtec.net/Reviews/JazzVtec/

So, are you saying now....that many cars no need to sell liao and alot of driving honda city are ahbeng on the road race everyday?

Well, I own a 05 city vtec....I'm a car enthusiast but not a riceboy as my car is completely stock with only customised floor mat, a window visor, a cheaplak low profile duckbill spoiler and a tomcat exhaust (totally less than 1k spent on car modding in 8 years of ownership) which i eventually took down as i given the car to my mom to drive now but yes, I certainly like to play 'racing ' with drivers who always tiong other car for simply that I like speed to feel I'm alive...but that's about it. So you are wrong again about ahbeng becuz i'm far from it.


But actually , that u have mentioned it, I kinda doubt about that result that sub 9s is slightly far-fetched....however, i think high 9s is achieveble tho but surely will be inconsistent. but it is true that vtec city 05 is quicker than Sentra 1.6 auto, Altis 1.6 auto, Vios 1.5 auto, Switft 1.5 auto, Waja 1.6 auto, Gen2 auto on factory paper.

=UPDATE #2=

QUOTE
"Left foot on the brake pedal, lightly squeeze the throttle and feel the
gearbox tension up and let go of the brake for the launch"--- City Vtech
Article

"Looking at the chart, the effect of a good and not so good run can be
clearly seen. The two data points on the 'wrong side' of 11 seconds were
from a less than optimal launch. But once I developed a 'feel' for the
launching method, it was relatively easy to get it consistently right and
this is clearly shown by the majority of the runs delivering times below
11 seconds"--- City idsi Performance check article.

Another site edmunds.com in their 2007 article, tested the jazz 0-60mph sprint for 9.3s

Economy and power
Both trim levels for this front-drive, five-door hatchback (the Fit is offered in base and Sport trim) feature a 1.5-liter, 109-horsepower VTEC four-cylinder engine. Delivering 105 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm, it posted a 9.3-second, 0-60-mph sprint.



This post has been edited by wayfeel: Oct 24 2013, 03:09 AM
wayfeel
post Oct 24 2013, 02:18 AM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 23 2013, 11:44 PM)
Updates : It's the Jazz Hybrid (CBU). It clocked 9.9s. He can't remember the exact time for City iVTEC but definitely not that fast. So, I guess it is about 11-12s.
*
It's not the jazz hybrid that does this...it's the 05 vtec jazz and also not the i-vtec city but the 05 city vtec....they r both very capable of hitting sub 10s. I'm sure, as when i accelerated from standstill, the car kinda squated. the hybrid i don't know . so is the current city....they r not as powerful as the 05 city vtec....my friends of current city admit themselves because it no longer uses the CVT of 05 city which contributed to the quick n responsive engine...somehow. you own the 05 vtec city, you should know what your car is capable of ...unless you didn't know the best launch mode or u less spirited driving with it? Apology if offended smile.gif but I do like to stress again that the 05 city vtec is a very capable car for it's segment
wayfeel
post Oct 25 2013, 12:14 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(theanswer @ Oct 25 2013, 11:15 AM)
chill bro. haters will hate.
i'm not a big fan of proton but i dont think u need big torque to crawl in traffic jam under 2000rpm. lol.
*
yea , dont need big torque to crawl...but if not enough tork to crawl, very annoying tuuu... smile.gif

QUOTE(k!nex @ Oct 25 2013, 11:46 AM)
Your old city vtec CVT is indeed feels more powerful than the 09 City. However if higher speed, the new one feels more stable. New one is heavy, thts y Vios can out accelerate it and FC goes up. Not only because of the 5AT vs CVT. Weight penalty sux man.. doh.gif

I owned the previous version City with D15B Vtec engine Type-Z. When I test drove the current facelifted City, I was like  doh.gif  WTH...0-100km/h  its so slow...LOL.  Gearbox not as jerky like my old 4AT though.
*
I wonder if putting a deck lip spoiler will improve stability slightly...if at mid speed 120-160. Feels more stable is seem just a gut feeling & instinct when your floor the pedal hee...I've heard ppl say before if the car hardly driven over 160 before (ESPECIALLY prior runned-in) then the car will feel floaty around at higher speed...otherwise...they quite grounded. I'm not sure if there's any truth in that or not...Myb difference of tires grade, road condition and even tire air pressure all that might influence that floatiness of a car at 160 or so
wayfeel
post Nov 1 2013, 03:59 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Nov 1 2013, 12:36 PM)
Honta is never durable while N-brand, not sure whether they have overcome the overheating issue. Can you explain?
*
beside a toyota, my family n i owned 2 used n 1 new Honda, no problem pun...wat ru talking about lol
wayfeel
post Nov 12 2013, 06:02 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Nov 12 2013, 09:41 AM)
Do you own N-brand like Cefiro, N16, X-Trail that have several cases of overheating at SC? Read properly.

As for your crappy Honda, drive it rough together with your Toyota, 10 years later, you tell me which one still in 1 piece. Answer is Toyota. Honda engine will experience more leakage, wear and tear, failure, etc compared to Toyota. Understand?

This is why Toyota is reliability king. Honda is not, not even close. Mazda, MMC and even Korean Hyundai-Kia are more durable than Honda. You can find Toyota and now Korean made included on harshest condition Arab states today. Mind you, only cars that have proven reliability/durability survive on those terrain and condition.
*
Crappy? Lol....why are you so emotional &..

...I don't get your logic.
U mention honda never reliable but it's few of the more reliable brands irregardless of order...my previous post I just mention we have hontas at home and didn't give problem. I think it's a valid owner input/
these r little cars not to be driven harsh like in Arab states, what has Korean cars and toyota made in the harshest condition has relevancy to do with honda being a reliable car for a normal household usage in malaysia ROFL....
Are you hallucinating there. and are the brands toyotas and korean car brands being under attack here?

most cars after 10years will not be surprisingly to replace parts be it any brands. there are both 10 over to 20 years toyotas and hontas cars OTR
DUDE....R U OK



This post has been edited by wayfeel: Nov 12 2013, 06:07 PM
wayfeel
post Nov 21 2013, 01:43 AM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East


QUOTE(MeToo @ Nov 20 2013, 04:09 PM)
+1

Toyota is best for offroad use and harsh weather condition aka Dakar Rally etc...

You only consider Honda if you live in a place with actual roads and no hail/typhoon/desert weather condition... like 99% of the ppl in LYN.
*
Ya I said for "normal household usage in malaysia" thats about majority of the ppls' need fulfill....at least far more than how much vote coalition could get in the last few PRU so I think 99% still extraordinarily high. then why does Jay still wants to argue about the 1% toyota does better than hontas


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Nov 20 2013, 11:15 AM)
You move your house and workplace to industrial area where the roads are in poorest condition. Then you tell me whether your Toyota better or Honda better after few years? Even Korean made is way more reliable than your Honda. Those who say Honda more reliable than Toyota are nothing more than some people that live in areas with good road condition, don't have to travel much in city traffic crawl and don't have to exposed to harsh weather much.
*
Logically speaking, you buy car that fits your purpose. means if you live plantation, rough terrain, harsh road condition , u buy 4WD, pickups, that fits the purpose not sedan car. U don't buy sedan car n goto field and complain of why is it breaking down prematurely.

Industrial area? So u live in one? why don't u just straightaway buy range rover...or Cygnus or Toyota Vigo . those r meant for 'harsh condition' you mentioned.

Besides, just that hontas rarely specialised in 4WD ,pickups and the likes and you are arguing toyota over hontas in a segment they r not particularly strong in and the forte of the toyotas? I think unfair comparison in THAT sense. Actually i for one, do live in an industrial area... but only 4 years, n the roads r REMOTELY flat (edit: and I counted there r about 10 big yellow bumps I've to drive thru , that's about 20 both ways if I go out. I do go out about twice a day.... u do the maths, alot of turnings into my house also, leftrightx5, few roundabouts. SRSLY I hate where i'm living now.) The 9yo honda city is ok with it....and TBH, I do think Msia roads are generally not of good condition but majority of hontas is ok....what do you expect? A gravel road in the whole of msia only u satisfied to say hontas car r OK? lol

I didn't even argue about hontas r more reliable than toyota but merely refute your claims of hontas r not reliable *in a fair level n logic discussion* i.e. nobody gonna drive a honda city around in plantation or pick the wrong car for the right job. There is a reason why sabah has one of the highest 4WD , pickups around in msia....3or 4 out of 10 cars on the road r pickups, 4wd n the likes because of the whole sabah is very unfriendly roads....ppl pick the right car for the right task ok. Hontas more specialised for city use n others that i didnt mentioned

Edit: and SRSLY , ppl less prefer korean cars in sabah, IDK why....so what if reliable. so far T,H,N are doing well here n still relatively reliable even if not as realiable as a Koreans....u think ppl stupiak not buy korean because they r more reliable. and there is alot more than just about reliability when the overall owning a car experience that sadly include RV as well but not the largely of it. and the korean didnt provide the holistic benefit in that sense



This post has been edited by wayfeel: Nov 21 2013, 02:19 AM
wayfeel
post Nov 22 2013, 04:07 PM

Member of Elite Negotiators xD
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: East



I agree to disagree with you. End of our discussion. pls be respectful next time in your post.

QUOTE(jayraptor @ Nov 22 2013, 10:18 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0206sec    0.42    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 07:41 AM