QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Jun 26 2008, 06:50 AM)
here's the SS...i am still new noob to ram OC actually

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
yes...can use no problem.....
normally its 2.2v depending on ram... but to use on more than 2.1v, its recommended to have air cooling on it...
some GEM u got there...

wish i had those kits...
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jun 26 2008, 02:55 PM)
i disagree about being silly to buy 2*1GB... i think its peoples preference and what exactly the users purpose is to use the rams for.. If you cant utilize 2GB why move to 4GB. theres nothing pantsy about it.
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 26 2008, 01:59 PM)
dude 4x1gb's are expensive..especially when u want d9gmh's
2x1gb is silly to buy.. cause ure just a pantsy if u do..
vista is the way
so its a 4gb clocking scene...
ppl want to see 4gb clocks.. whether its 4x1gb or 2x2gb..
cause thats the current need for gaming
for us who actually love online gaming for FPS and strategy..
need those 4gb's with vista.
ati HD3000 series and HD4000 series is made for vista..
they dont perform that well for xp..
yep... different ppl, different needs. even vista do eats LOTs of RAM, 2GB for gaming in vista is not bad either, google yourself about 2gb vs 4b vista gaming, diff only minimal and im talking about less than 3%, and about +-5 FPS difference. human eye still cant see the difference.
when gaming, we are talking about FRAMERATE, not how much ur system utilize the ram. U guys might want to remember that.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/709/3/
Why is 4gb nuts? 1gb is about the standard now and 2gb is much more popular, so what' nuts about it? is it more nuts than two video cards in sli? or quad cores? heck what about the famed PPU?
again i don't defend all aspects of the os, but there are some things i see as necessary to move things forward. and since it's not on the shelves yet, all else seems to be speculation.
hopefully the whole eula matter gets cleared up, otherwise i doubt many people will switch, which would be a shame because otherwise it seems like it's going to be a nice step forward.
ram usage should be brought under control, but by everyone, not just ms, practically every piece of software out there is bloated to some degree, why?
cuz ram is cheap!
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jun 26 2008, 05:10 PM)
i think u guys gaming on high reso.. mine still ok on 1280x1024..
highest hit ~2.3gb
so by everage depend on users need..
high resolution gaming relies on GPU's ram. Higher amount of ram on ur graphic card will allow u to run higher resolution with ease..
This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jun 26 2008, 10:19 PM