Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 LYN's DDR2 Discussion, Come in and share

views
     
BlackThyra87
post Apr 3 2007, 09:15 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(DoubleClick @ Apr 2 2007, 11:22 PM)
I discover that TGI(TEAM GROUP INCORPORATION) also following the trend of value ram that has high-overclocking potential

Below is some of the screenshots
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

I wonder if it is Micron or not...hmm....
*
either its Hynix or Micron...

check it out la....nice clocks there!

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Apr 3 2007, 09:16 PM
BlackThyra87
post Jun 25 2008, 08:18 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



just got my Ballistix Tracers from shawty last nite.

tested them, and found out that they are not as good as it used to be sad.gif

@2.2v i can only push up to 458MHz (916 DDR, 1:1) with 5-4-4-12.cant even boot at that speed with 4-4-4-12 .. while my D9GKX can do it absolutely with no sweat @ 2.0v...

is it the ram or my P35-DS3 is holding it out? tried various tweaking but none helps. Refer to my sig for my specs.

so the rumors that the 1gb modules chips got changed is true then, and high density modules are useless for OC (cant expect more like before - low vdimm @ 9xx)

any comments?

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jun 25 2008, 08:21 AM
BlackThyra87
post Jun 26 2008, 02:03 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(fesick @ Jun 25 2008, 01:09 PM)
bro BlackThyra87,your D9GKX run at same setting?
*
ya my D9GKX can run much higher speeds with no troubles

QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jun 25 2008, 01:23 PM)
tracers have heat issues... and also maybe it uses lousy d9.... by the way, its true that tracers might not be as good as it might have been.. why dont u just try the ballistixs instead of the tracers...
*
well, i didn't expect that normal ballistix and tracers differs that much! doh.gif cuz both should OC well judging from results posted by overclockers around the world..

as u can see... i already bought that pair .... anybody interested swapping my tracers with normal ballistix?? rolleyes.gif tongue.gif

QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jun 25 2008, 01:23 PM)
tracers have heat issues... and also maybe it uses lousy d9.... by the way, its true that tracers might not be as good as it might have been.. why dont u ust try the ballistixs instead of the tracers...
*
i measured my ram temp (dual memtest) and the temp tops up to 56C @ load (100% memory usage) and about 46C under normal operation @ 2.2vdimm. sweat.gif

very true, i think tracers dont use D9GMH no more.. probably D9GCT or some other poor oc chips.

QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Jun 25 2008, 06:49 PM)
i guess that is just the norm for the tracers... had one last time on the p35-ds3 as well n it craps out at 990mhz 5-5-5-15 with 2.2vdimm doh.gif  sweat.gif

but after that i changed to normal ballistix on the same mobo and it can go around 1000mhz 5-5-5-15 on stock vdimm
*
hmm 990mhz is quite a an achievement.. but i didnt test max oc of my sticks yet. gonna test it out later. i'll keep u guys posted.

wow normal ballistix can do 1ghz @ NORMAL vdimm? thats awesome... can show me some screenies? tempting... hmm.gif

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jun 26 2008, 02:12 AM
BlackThyra87
post Jun 26 2008, 09:57 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Jun 26 2008, 06:50 AM)
here's the SS...i am still new noob to ram OC actually blush.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

yes...can use no problem.....
normally its 2.2v depending on ram... but to use on more than 2.1v, its recommended to have air cooling on it...
*
some GEM u got there... biggrin.gif wish i had those kits... sad.gif

QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jun 26 2008, 02:55 PM)
i disagree about being silly to buy 2*1GB... i think its peoples preference and what exactly the users purpose is to use the rams for.. If you cant utilize 2GB why move to 4GB. theres nothing pantsy about it.
*
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 26 2008, 01:59 PM)
dude 4x1gb's are expensive..especially when u want d9gmh's

2x1gb is silly to buy.. cause ure just a pantsy if u do..
vista is the way

so its a 4gb clocking scene...
ppl want to see 4gb clocks.. whether its 4x1gb or 2x2gb..
cause thats the current need for gaming

for us who actually love online gaming for FPS and strategy..
need those 4gb's with vista.
ati HD3000 series and HD4000 series is made for vista..
they dont perform that well for xp..
*
yep... different ppl, different needs. even vista do eats LOTs of RAM, 2GB for gaming in vista is not bad either, google yourself about 2gb vs 4b vista gaming, diff only minimal and im talking about less than 3%, and about +-5 FPS difference. human eye still cant see the difference.

when gaming, we are talking about FRAMERATE, not how much ur system utilize the ram. U guys might want to remember that.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Why is 4gb nuts? 1gb is about the standard now and 2gb is much more popular, so what' nuts about it? is it more nuts than two video cards in sli? or quad cores? heck what about the famed PPU?

again i don't defend all aspects of the os, but there are some things i see as necessary to move things forward. and since it's not on the shelves yet, all else seems to be speculation.

hopefully the whole eula matter gets cleared up, otherwise i doubt many people will switch, which would be a shame because otherwise it seems like it's going to be a nice step forward.

ram usage should be brought under control, but by everyone, not just ms, practically every piece of software out there is bloated to some degree, why?

cuz ram is cheap!
QUOTE(8tvt @ Jun 26 2008, 05:10 PM)
i think u guys gaming on high reso.. mine still ok on 1280x1024..
highest hit ~2.3gb
so by everage depend on users need..
*
high resolution gaming relies on GPU's ram. Higher amount of ram on ur graphic card will allow u to run higher resolution with ease..

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jun 26 2008, 10:19 PM
BlackThyra87
post Jun 27 2008, 12:27 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(phunkydude @ Jun 27 2008, 09:35 AM)
oh no...
did u mean u won't feels any lag, when ram usage hit 99% ?
so, u think got a bad-ass gtx280 won't have any lag on 99% ram usage, due to the graphic card too powerful?

in general,
ppl go for 4gb when their ram usage frequently hit >90% when using 2gb.
ppl don't go for 4gb, for what u said "3% diff / +-5 FPS"

-

guys, u should try vista 1st before saying 1gb / 2 gb is enough.
even my lappy's on vista home, fresh boot to window.. already hoggs 1gb ram usage.
if i were to open another few apps. & play new titles game on it.
what makes u think 2gb is enough for gaming on vista?

yes, it's enough to play solitaire.. though  drool.gif

-

and yes, i agree 2gb is enough on winxp in general.
though mine goes over 2gb usage when running 2 smp folding, firefox, msn, online game.

*DO note that the usage that i'm implicating is with the virtual mem. turned to off.
as i want snappy performance on my daily alt-tab out tab in, etc.
*
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jun 27 2008, 09:47 AM)
1~2GB certainly is not enough for Vista if youre running heavy on apps...like smp folding, online gaming and browsing thru internet. It will sure hit the 2GB or more mark.. Still, im sure 2GB can run on Vista if u manage your system well.
*
u guys CLEARLY dont understand on how windows manage system memory.

i will say no more. do read my previous post.

lol.

QUOTE(LExus65 @ Jun 27 2008, 11:22 AM)
speaking ram utilisation, i got a interesting question here. In 32bit OS, we know only 3+gb of the 4gb is available to be use, so there are some remain.

my question is will the remaining ram capacity suffer some sort of degradtion as it not being used ? I'm not sure how the ram utilisation is spread between the ram chip itself, so it may happen some ram chip is not working at all, or all the chips are working randomly. 

BTW those review on 2gb vs 4gb, i notice usually the benching rig does not have much background program running like most user did,
*
the remaining ram that is unaddressable by windows is being used for windows IO mappings. more detailed explanations can be found here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929605

i dont see why there should be any performance degradation because windows still at least 3.2GB of available system memory.

haha thats why its called Random access memory. everything that we run in windows is stored temporarily in the ram for quicker access and located in random places in the ram address space.

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jun 27 2008, 01:03 PM
BlackThyra87
post Jun 27 2008, 01:04 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jun 27 2008, 12:32 PM)
well dude, if you do think we dont know, then teach us.  Coz i am still living in the age of Xp and 32-bit systems.. so if theres something new, where u think we r just dumb in it, teach us. We are not stuck up to learn.. thank you.
*
well, i never think u guys are dumb. everyone can learn, just make sure which source, we got the internet -google, etc. so in this case, i will try to explain in the best of my ability.

so stay tuned. will post it later. im @ work tongue.gif

p/s: this thread just turned to GENERAL RAM dicussion, and not particularly DDR2? tongue.gif

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jun 27 2008, 01:10 PM
BlackThyra87
post Jun 27 2008, 09:28 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(gamers maniac @ Jun 27 2008, 07:09 PM)
just coming back fr lowyat just now. im very2 surprised that lowyat now got plenty of corsair dominator and dhx ver1.1. tempting to grab one, but choose team xtreem instead..
*
like to hear from ur results! biggrin.gif
BlackThyra87
post Jul 3 2008, 04:20 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(treason @ Jul 3 2008, 11:04 AM)
Hey guys something strange..

I bought a pair of hyper X pc6400 but its shows pc5300 in cpu-z...the box and the ram itself shows pc6400 though..hahahaha..

any thoughts?
*
huh? i dont think kingston mislabeled their products. is that what SPD gave u? check ur settings.

QUOTE(Hoodlums @ Jul 3 2008, 02:01 PM)
Team Dark Xtreem PC2 6400 4GB Kit (DDRII 800 2GBx2) is good for OC or not? hmm.gif
*
i believe Team Xtreem is all OC gems.. so u better test them right away... biggrin.gif let us know soon.
BlackThyra87
post Jul 10 2008, 11:47 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(wlcling @ Jul 9 2008, 08:47 PM)
i just got a 2x 1gb kingston-800mhz on CL5. so just wondering if i can get more out of it without too much trouble (mobo is asus p5ld2 se)?

user posted image

Also, in the screenshot above, i have 4 RAM slots total used which is my old 2x512mb(512mhz) and the new 2x1gb(800mhz)... is it ok to match all of them together?

TQ sifu-sifu!
*
of course its ok to put them all together but the downside is, it will run at the lowest speed which is 266MHz (SPD) as shown in the screenie.

for me, its better if u take out ur old 2x512 and let alone the 2x1gb run at dual channel+800Mhz speed.

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jul 10 2008, 11:50 AM
BlackThyra87
post Jul 11 2008, 10:42 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(coolice @ Jul 10 2008, 06:47 PM)
PSC chip in G.Skill 9600CL5D-4GBPI
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=387046
*
wow.... thats well over 1.5Ghz man... which is RARE!!

coolaler pwnz! XD he's a lagend.
BlackThyra87
post Jul 11 2008, 11:18 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jul 11 2008, 10:44 AM)
yeah coolice.. is crazy ocer lol...
*
lol its not coolice.. look deeper... its COOLALER

the lagendary overclocker.

dont tell me u dont know him lol..

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jul 11 2008, 11:21 AM
BlackThyra87
post Jul 16 2008, 08:05 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



damn u guys got some nice rams... sigh..

my tracers even refuse to run 4-4-4-12 @ 916MHz at 2.2v. Now im running them @ that speed with 5-4-4-12 though..

lazy to tweak them much..
BlackThyra87
post Jul 16 2008, 11:07 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jul 16 2008, 09:24 PM)
is it the old batch or the new batch of tracers? When u bought it.. new batch of tracers use high density rams that excel in cl5 and not on cl4.
*
my tracers are the new batch i can say.. bought from shawty.

i havent push it to the edge yet.

any records regarding new this new tracers yet?
BlackThyra87
post Jul 24 2008, 07:05 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



hmm...

looks like my tracers running fine with 514MHz (1.03GHz)

Vista Ultimate x86 SP1 (Tweaked)

RAM: 5-5-5-15 @ 2.2v

Some Benchmarks:

user posted image

Everest Ultimate 4.50.1330 Final

user posted image

Haven't Stress Test it yet, will do it later.

Gonna put my rig on some serious 3D gaming session for a few hours 1st. See if its stable.

how about u guys?

post some results! biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jul 24 2008, 07:13 PM
BlackThyra87
post Jul 25 2008, 12:50 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(rosihan @ Jul 24 2008, 07:31 PM)
how bout da temp?
how u cool ur ram arr
mine 2.0v really hot one
*
it went high as 54C after 6 hours of ORTHOS!

QUOTE(ham_revilo @ Jul 24 2008, 09:09 PM)
imo ur sub timing is a lil loose and its actually better if u could do 1:1 rather than 5:6
*
yea i just leave it auto, whenever i try to adjust it, windows will go BSOD right away.

wonder which subtiming to tweak? any guide?
BlackThyra87
post Jul 25 2008, 09:42 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(ham_revilo @ Jul 25 2008, 02:42 AM)
try tighten ur trd, and performance level... go slowly and for me, i'll try tighten everything. make sure all the timing is tighten to the max. anyways im not that good at sub timing too. so correct me if im wrong.
*
tRD = Performance Level bro...

will try that.. will go down 1 by 1 hmm.gif
BlackThyra87
post Jul 25 2008, 10:54 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



yep.. anandtech pinpointed that for 800MHz strap should be able to set up to 5 tRD aka Performance Level. it has quite huge impact on memory read bandwidth.

im using the exact settings as showed. (strap 800, 5/4 divider)

its a good read!

http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3208&p=5

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jul 25 2008, 10:55 AM
BlackThyra87
post Jul 25 2008, 07:55 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



UPDATE:

Made some tweaks on memory sub-timings and guess what? biggrin.gif

user posted image

now thats some BIG improvements! but memory write remains about the same hmm.gif

Tried to lower tRD to 6 but system got freezed. sad.gif

and if i apply any lower than 50 in tRFC, freezed sad.gif

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jul 25 2008, 07:58 PM
BlackThyra87
post Jul 25 2008, 10:21 PM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Jul 25 2008, 10:07 PM)
Here is some everest ss of my rig@536fsb with not that tweaked sub timing.
user posted image
@BlackThyra87,try trtp to 4,might help. rclxms.gif
*
curious about ur sub timings, mind show it to us? biggrin.gif

and what OS are u using?

here's the result after setting tRTP to 4:

user posted image

not much improvement hmm.gif

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jul 25 2008, 10:28 PM
BlackThyra87
post Jul 26 2008, 04:23 AM

Can't be Mad.
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pulau Indah



QUOTE(ham_revilo @ Jul 26 2008, 04:03 AM)
since everyone is posting their results, here's mind tongue.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

so far i cant get any higher than that
@BlackThyra87
btw, actually what i meant was the trd_wr.
*
nice bandwidth..

btw, what OS ur using? and pls state ur vDIMM/vMCH/vFSB values.

p/s: if everyone feels like posting their results, state your OS too. smile.gif

This post has been edited by BlackThyra87: Jul 26 2008, 04:27 AM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0465sec    0.81    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 12:21 PM