Hi guys, which is better, a higher or lower compressed bits per pixel? Thanks
The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.22, NEW RUMORE Nikon DF!
The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.22, NEW RUMORE Nikon DF!
|
|
Oct 9 2013, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
26,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Hi guys, which is better, a higher or lower compressed bits per pixel? Thanks
|
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 12:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
26,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Human Nature @ Oct 9 2013, 09:47 PM) Higher value = fine settingLower value = normal setting So logically, higher value is 'better'. But isn't it that higher value means more bits are compressed and that is not a good thing right? Is there actually a big difference between fine and normal setting? Thanks |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0486sec
0.64
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:44 AM |