Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.22, NEW RUMORE Nikon DF!

views
     
Human Nature
post Oct 9 2013, 09:47 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,529 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Hi guys, which is better, a higher or lower compressed bits per pixel? Thanks
Human Nature
post Oct 10 2013, 12:56 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,529 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Human Nature @ Oct 9 2013, 09:47 PM)
Hi guys, which is better, a higher or lower compressed bits per pixel? Thanks
*
Higher value = fine setting
Lower value = normal setting

So logically, higher value is 'better'. But isn't it that higher value means more bits are compressed and that is not a good thing right?

Is there actually a big difference between fine and normal setting? Thanks

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0486sec    0.64    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:44 AM