Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

  CNET's Quick Guide 2006 , Mobile Phone Radiation Levels (SAR)

views
     
youngkies
post Jun 4 2006, 09:52 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


And more info:

implication of SAR is on diff phone form factor..

-normal candybar with external antenna directly expose radiation wave to the brain..

-flip phone with external antenna expose radiation wave to jaw and cheek region

-phone with built in internal antenna expose radiation wave to ear area..

therefore it would be reasonable for flip-phone to have higher sar than normal candybar with external antenna phone.. due to the region of exposure...



youngkies
post Jun 4 2006, 11:11 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(Zer0 c00L @ Jun 4 2006, 11:59 PM)
wow,good stuff...i wonder how long did it take for them 2 do this...
*
the hv measuring device.. a phone must below the limit to pass the authority/approval.. if not the phone wont be on the market..
youngkies
post Jun 5 2006, 09:12 AM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(The Silent Killer @ Jun 5 2006, 02:55 AM)
so if we r using hp, we r making our time life short??
*
dont worry.. u hv to worry more on pollution rather than handphone sar issue..
youngkies
post Jun 5 2006, 02:22 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


radiation and exposure is totally different term and meaning..

radiation is emission of energy, while exposure is act of exposing..

radiation is there whether u are exposed to it or not...

generally, radiation is more suitable and widely used in this context

you can see how they use radiation in following link too..

this is good site for more info

This post has been edited by youngkies: Jun 5 2006, 02:28 PM
youngkies
post Jun 6 2006, 11:07 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(The Silent Killer @ Jun 6 2006, 08:53 PM)
but no matter how we make it far...we still have the phone stick to our body when we r in shooping mall or sumtin....tats the use of walkman phone wat....
*
dont have to really worry la.. the radiation is so small that it is insignificant... sun radiation is even higher than phone radiation.. and the radiation only takes place/highest when u are using the phone for call...

if u talk on phone for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, then that will be different story la..

This post has been edited by youngkies: Jun 6 2006, 11:08 PM
youngkies
post Jun 6 2006, 11:56 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(The Silent Killer @ Jun 7 2006, 12:23 AM)
but they say put in the pocket will kill sperm.....later mati pucuk faster than other ppl -.-
*
who are they?

if really so.. then u can hear a lot of cases where the people vs. handphone manufacturer in courts.. if it is significant or else..

tats is why they hv sar limit below 1.6 or 2.0... safe for human use
youngkies
post Jun 9 2006, 07:26 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(eric84cool @ Jun 9 2006, 03:09 PM)
Emmm...where do u guyz normally place ur phone when u go out?!? I place my HP inside my right hand side pocket ...iszit ok ar?
*
yes i put in poucn in my jeans pocket too...

dont worry la.. no prob de.. radiation is only take place or highest when the phone is on call..
youngkies
post Jun 14 2006, 07:28 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jun 14 2006, 05:30 PM)
how much radiation a pouch can reduce? smile.gif
*
insignificant.. maybe u shud wrap the phone with lead or foil maybe.. haha! to totally irradicate the radiation.. and radiation take place when phone is in call. so i guess normally, whne in standby sits in ur pocket wont do nothing much.. even on call, the radiation also wont do nothing much other than generating heat..
youngkies
post Jun 14 2006, 08:24 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=301238

lol! this is good... but it is just heat.. not any source of radiation causing cancer or watsoever..
youngkies
post Jun 15 2006, 02:13 AM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Jun 15 2006, 01:56 AM)
I am sure the heat will cause some sort of damage to the brain.

That's seriously shocking.
*
the heat is insignificant... if it is really that significant, then phone is banned long ago.. at least as long as the phone within their safe SAR, it wont be significant to health really..

anyway, radiowave cause the BBB more leaky...
youngkies
post Jun 15 2006, 04:57 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


hmm... actually this is really controversial then.. maybe shud never use phone then... or use it less than a decade long so reduce chance of risk to health..

or alternative: maybe use bluetooth or handsfree and place the phone far away.. hehe!
youngkies
post Jun 17 2006, 02:22 AM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jun 17 2006, 01:56 AM)
how bout using headset?  tongue.gif
*
if headset also got radiation.. i wouldnt say no.. since sound is sort of energy too.. but if headset radiation or energy emitted or watsover is significant to health too.. i will totally sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif .. hehe! then all electrical shud be eliminated from this world..
youngkies
post Jun 17 2006, 05:40 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jun 17 2006, 06:12 PM)
hmm...wired headset's radiotion not tat bad gua....

how bout those bt ones?
*
bt also got radiation... but too small to be significant..
youngkies
post Jul 25 2006, 01:03 AM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(dokidoki @ Jul 21 2006, 05:07 PM)
how come w800 and w810 the sar so much diff sad.gif?
*
tri band for w800i and quad band with edge for w810i.. tat is why maybe
youngkies
post Sep 14 2006, 04:07 PM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(the_aki @ Sep 13 2006, 07:43 PM)
I read in a magazine that a guy made an experiment with 2 handphones .He put an egg in the middle and use the phone to call each other and put it opposite each other with the egg in the middle...

Took the phone 16 minutes to cook the egg...

Imagine how much damage it has done to ur brain..

scary....
*
yup i watched that video before... it is pure heat from the phone that cooked the egg... so before the phone cooked ur brain, it will cook ur ear first... hahaha!
youngkies
post Sep 27 2006, 02:57 AM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Sep 15 2006, 02:21 PM)
what phone they were using? blink.gif
*
old skool phone if i am not mistaken
youngkies
post Sep 28 2006, 02:59 AM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Sep 28 2006, 01:58 AM)
u mean those water bottle type of phone? tongue.gif
*
not 500 ml one la.. maybe those 200 ml only la.. hahah! those phone from ericsson famous age lo..
youngkies
post Sep 28 2006, 03:48 AM

Monday <--> Friday
Group Icon
VIP
9,511 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Sep 28 2006, 04:01 AM)
what if you put two of those phones beside your pants? tongue.gif
*
in the experiment, one of the phone call the other phone.. so basically both phones were in calling and cooked the egg..

it may cook ur ball if both phones are in calling.. hahah!





 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0221sec    0.55    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 09:43 AM