Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V10, Merry X'Mas and Happy New Year

views
     
pcboss00
post Sep 25 2013, 05:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
user posted image
Dutch!
pcboss00
post Oct 10 2013, 05:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
TLDM lagi. TUDM gonna rage...
pcboss00
post Oct 17 2013, 10:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
1st hand apologize by author. biggrin.gif
pcboss00
post Oct 17 2013, 03:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
huhu... just found out. viper can fire sidewinder and Apache can't.
pcboss00
post Oct 17 2013, 04:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
we in era of multi role. since ground troop nowdays already use uav.
pcboss00
post Oct 17 2013, 04:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(kinabalu @ Oct 17 2013, 04:32 PM)
Ac-130 better than attack heli.... but too bad Amerika not exporting it. sad.gif

user posted image
*
Got cheaper version using CN-235 by Airbus.
user posted image
http://www.airbusmilitary.com/Missions/Mis...ry/Special.aspx
pcboss00
post Oct 18 2013, 12:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Oct 18 2013, 09:57 AM)
I dun mean using the current Samudera's design. I mean using the Samudera design to build a larger vessel..
*
Actually Samudera-class based from larger vessel
user posted image
user posted image
1400-ton OPV
pcboss00
post Oct 22 2013, 03:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
surprise. surprise. Look familiar brows.gif
user posted image
pcboss00
post Oct 24 2013, 05:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(yinchet @ Oct 24 2013, 04:19 PM)
That you have ask navy guys.
For ciws i prefer searams combo with phalanx or millenium or ds30sigma.
Hopefully our sgpv get nice ciws but rumors says it only equip with ds30m which is very sad for rm1.5bil.
I hope these is not true.
Fot goodness sake for such price tags at least get ds30 sigma variant and searams.
*
If... Ifff... If ToT, macro economy, National security strategy and others are not in our priority, we maybe can get like these

user posted image
Iver Huitfeldt class
USD333 million

user posted image
Valour class
USD327 million

user posted image
Modified KDX-I for RTN
USD468 million

This post has been edited by pcboss00: Oct 24 2013, 11:11 PM
pcboss00
post Oct 24 2013, 11:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Oct 24 2013, 07:09 PM)
those pricetag are not written in stone
*
I know. That's why I quoted something usd 100m cheaper than ours. Ours sgpv almost same price with frigate selected by Thais.
pcboss00
post Oct 25 2013, 08:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Oct 25 2013, 12:49 AM)
lebih kurang je rasanya

user posted image

our sgpv is also around 3000ton range

but i think we should opt for 76mm gun and phalanx though (there might be a possibility to arm our sgpv with JSM. though i'm perfectly fine with MM40 mark 3)

well there's also the issue of streamlining logistics so i can understand why we choose 57mm guns and them 30mm cannon
*
"They" said, 57mm perform better than 76mm as anti-air gun. I think that's why we choose DS30M as 3rd layer air defence. Any Gatling gun CIWS pair with a 57mm look like a redundant to me.
pcboss00
post Oct 25 2013, 10:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(yinchet @ Oct 25 2013, 10:10 AM)
Lolz.
How the would it be redundant?
Btw bofor 40mm mk4 were meant to be ciws but not the 57mm mk3.
It would be redundant if we have the 40mm.
I would still prefer we are going for searams as it were much more effective in countering asm
And even better if it were combo with ds30m sigma variant.
*
If we want to use Bofors 57 mm 3P ammunitions, than it will be redundant. It got same max effective range with gun based CIWS (+-4 km).
pcboss00
post Oct 27 2013, 10:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
No essm. I told ya. So identical to Oman khareef-class corvette armament. No, their main gun better. Price? Cheaper than our kedah class.
pcboss00
post Oct 28 2013, 10:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE
ESSM range 50kms price US$ 800,000
Mica range 20km price EURO  1.2m -1.7m(2009) (US$ 1.7 m -US$2.3m)


Technically, MICA-VL cheaper to opt than ESSM. MICA don't need launcher because their storage canister already worked as launcher. What make ESSM more expensive, they need extra hardware; 2 illumination radar and launcher.

MICA = fire and forget, ESSM = guidance; guidance need many hardware controller.
Conclusion: why MICA (not per whole system) more expensive; the canister make them expensive. Also caused by low rate production and it is a European stuff!

tongue.gif I'm not a mica fan, but i must clarified the mystery.

This post has been edited by pcboss00: Oct 28 2013, 10:32 AM
pcboss00
post Oct 28 2013, 11:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(thpace @ Oct 28 2013, 10:38 AM)
aster 15 and aster 30 is also a fire and forget missile with better range than mica. Not to mistaken, same cost as mica system but better capabilities.

though now it mica, should they opt for a better ciws since it freaking rm1.5billion and all we got ciws is a toy gun technically speaking

even indon and thai have but not us?
*
No la. Aster 15/30 must use guidance system, by air (defense) radar. Not same like ESSM must use illumination radar.

btw biggrin.gif
user posted image
pcboss00
post Oct 28 2013, 11:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
after this, we need full fledged frigates. same thing will happened...
pcboss00
post Oct 28 2013, 11:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(asyraff88kmp @ Oct 28 2013, 11:41 AM)
so, what is the reaction of panggilanpertiwi and other military enthusiasts? takkan berdiam diri je kot.
*
it's not official yet. but when it became official, maybe it already too late... hahaha
pcboss00
post Oct 28 2013, 01:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(HangPC2 @ Oct 28 2013, 01:06 PM)
zzzz they never market it as CIWS.
pcboss00
post Oct 29 2013, 12:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
It not songlapped yet if we pay the right price for the right hardware. Just wait for the official. Yinchet just had a knee jerk. tongue.gif
pcboss00
post Oct 29 2013, 01:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
Zzzz I see the ship as a system. Not hardware. Every single stuff is a hardware. If we pay a gun at the right price, why get mad. It's not official yet. When it become official and I'm not happy with the final specs, we rage together. tongue.gif

3 Pages  1 2 3 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0588sec    0.28    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:31 AM