Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
PC Audio Altec Lansing Fans Club (approaching 90 members), Sound Leadership For The Digital Age
|
Najmods
|
 May 24 2008, 12:54 PM
|
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ May 24 2008, 12:35 PM) oh.. hehe... MX5021... that speaker so good oo.. too bad...after bought sound card then cant buy that one  Btw , what you think about FX6021 ? how isit compare with MX5021 ? I suggest you don't buy the FX6021 simply because the satellite have 6 tiny 1-inch driver. Tiny driver sounds crap at high volume, furthermore it will sounds bright too because those tiny driver resembles tweeter instead of midbass so vocal doesn't comes out nice Well, you better audition both setup, and buy judging on how you like them. One man's meat is another man's poison  |
|
|
|
|
|
Najmods
|
May 24 2008, 01:59 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ May 24 2008, 01:50 PM) So this mean I cant get the 31Hz effect on MX5021 when it has frequency response of 30 - 22000 Hz ? hehe... noob so many question  Why do you care about this? Have you tested pure 30Hz tone? Maybe the music you tried doesn't even reach that low Here is 30Hz tone if you want to hear how it sounds 
30hztone.wav ( 23.49k )
Number of downloads: 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Najmods
|
May 24 2008, 02:25 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ May 24 2008, 02:19 PM) hehe.. ok then... Btw , im curious ... I got a WMA song which is 64kbps if I convert it into 256kbps ...will the sound improve ? I found no, becasue the bass of the song make the bass "pecah" while all other song no.  It won't improve the quality, simply because it can't put back the data that has been lost from previous encoding. Never ever increase the bitrate of a song, it can go down, but not up |
|
|
|
|
|
Najmods
|
May 24 2008, 02:31 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ May 24 2008, 02:29 PM) Thanks for reply .. then what about I convert a 320kbps MP3 to WAV format and then encode it into FLAC... got different also ? Im trying to find...but seems hard , almost no different.  NO, I told you already, you can go down but not up. Convert from lossy to lossless is a big no no, it just makes the files bigger without any quality difference |
|
|
|
|
|
Najmods
|
May 24 2008, 02:40 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(coolkwc @ May 24 2008, 02:34 PM) some more convert to one file format to another file format also is a big no no... I like to elaborate. Lossless to lossless is OK, but it makes no difference, but if your player doesn't support certain file format then you can do it. Lossy to another lossy is no no Well, that is the main purpose of buying original CD, absolute best quality. But you can download the WAV or FLAC files online too.......  |
|
|
|
|
|
Najmods
|
May 24 2008, 03:07 PM
|
|
|
For me, buying original CD is more than just sound quality. I like to read the artist Thank You's inside it, and see who appreciate their fans |
|
|
|
|
|
Najmods
|
May 24 2008, 04:42 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ May 24 2008, 04:27 PM) wow... Im ripping some song from jay chou's album.. Im using the Super Rip from Creative Media Source... and use the Loseless Audio setting... then ripped out a song which is 150MB @ 5729Kbps frequency is 98Khz , bit per sample - 24bit... I dont have idea rip to what frequency and bit per sample... any suggestion ? Redbook CD (audio CD standard) is only 16-bit/44.1kHz with 1411.2kbps (in WAV format). Rip using EAC |
|
|
|
|
|
Najmods
|
May 24 2008, 07:12 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ May 24 2008, 04:49 PM) your EAC means the software exact audio copy ?  Yup, that is my own personal preferences. You can use any other CD ripping apps too. I use EAC to get the absolute best quality when ripping |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0404sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled