Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 36 37 38 39 40 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 [V1] Nokia Lumia 1020, most powerful cameraphone in this planet

views
     
kayent
post Oct 4 2013, 03:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
213 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


Those pics sure looked good. Can't wait to test the full capabilities of the camera when I go on vacation next week.
davidletterboyz
post Oct 4 2013, 03:04 PM

Der Kaiser
*******
Senior Member
4,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Finally, someone with 808PV experience posted 1020PV samples here. Those pics you uploaded here seem to have lesser noise than expected. They are taken straight out from the phone without PP?
Actually what is your take about image quality vs 808PV?
Two things that I noticed 1020PV doing a better job that 808PV are OIS and manual focus (macro focusing with 808PV can be a PITA).
hox
post Oct 4 2013, 03:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
340 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
yup, right from the camera...no post-processing

the OIS is huge when comes to image sharpness even for daylight shot. I have alot of 808 shots that are out of focus when view at 100% crop. Manual focus is faster and more accurate too. The 4.5" screen also helps a lot.

This post has been edited by hox: Oct 4 2013, 03:11 PM
Andy214
post Oct 4 2013, 03:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Oct 4 2013, 03:04 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Finally, someone with 808PV experience posted 1020PV samples here. Those pics you uploaded here seem to have lesser noise than expected. They are taken straight out from the phone without PP?
Actually what is your take about image quality vs 808PV?
Two things that I noticed 1020PV doing a better job that 808PV are OIS and manual focus (macro focusing with 808PV can be a PITA).
*
Those are outdoor daylight shots, plus you need to view in full resolution to see more clearly.
But it's great to have the ability to control shutter speed, which is what I always wanted in 808PV.

As hox mentioned, another great improvements is the "focusing speed", and I think focusing as well from my short test. 808PV sometimes or quite often, unable to lock focus, gives you red box. When I tested the L1020, seems like OK, but need current 808PV and L1020 users to confirm.
pikacu
post Oct 4 2013, 03:21 PM

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Oct 4 2013, 02:49 PM)
I have no idea. I do not have a WP8 phone. tongue.gif
But it's very easy to share full reso pics from my 808PV.
*
you dont say.. laugh.gif
davidletterboyz
post Oct 4 2013, 03:21 PM

Der Kaiser
*******
Senior Member
4,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(hox @ Oct 4 2013, 03:06 PM)
yup, right from the camera...no post-processing

the OIS is huge when comes to image sharpness even for daylight shot. I have alot of 808 shots that are out of focus when view at 100% crop. Manual focus is faster and more accurate too. The 4.5" screen also helps a lot.
*
Your 808 shots are out of focus or blurry? Two diff things.
I had tried 920's manual focus and it's great. Wish my 808PV has it too haha.

QUOTE(Andy214 @ Oct 4 2013, 03:14 PM)
Those are outdoor daylight shots, plus you need to view in full resolution to see more clearly.
But it's great to have the ability to control shutter speed, which is what I always wanted in 808PV.

As hox mentioned, another great improvements is the "focusing speed", and I think focusing as well from my short test. 808PV sometimes or quite often, unable to lock focus, gives you red box. When I tested the L1020, seems like OK, but need current 808PV and L1020 users to confirm.
*
Those are taken from 5MP files I think. Need to see the full resolution file which I think 808PV is cleaner (except in low light?).
Yeah one thing I don't like in 808PV is the focusing performance. Even the infinite focus distance is not perfect.

hox
post Oct 4 2013, 03:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
340 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Oct 4 2013, 03:21 PM)
Your 808 shots are out of focus or blurry? Two diff things.
I had tried 920's manual focus and it's great. Wish my 808PV has it too haha.
Those are taken from 5MP files I think. Need to see the full resolution file which I think 808PV is cleaner (except in low light?).
Yeah one thing I don't like in 808PV is the focusing performance. Even the infinite focus distance is not perfect.
*
blurry because out of focus hehe

its actually both blurry of movement without OIS and out of focus due to failure to have proper focus lock.

btw, the super wide angle is really great for architecture and interior shots.

just found the setting to lower screen saturation, lowered 2 notches and the colors are more accurate now.

user posted image

This post has been edited by hox: Oct 4 2013, 04:05 PM
s7ran9er
post Oct 4 2013, 03:45 PM

ლ(;◉;益;◉;ლ)
*******
Senior Member
4,210 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(hox @ Oct 4 2013, 02:57 PM)
Finally got time to test the camera and now abit less intimidated to post here since i m no photography expert  sweat.gif
posted below are resized 5MP version to fit the forum, 100% crop if from 5MP. No editing except the downsizing and cropping.

Thoughts on Lumia 1020 camera
From a person who has been using Pureview 808 for long time, I think Lumia 1020 is definitely worth the upgrade if price is not an issue. There are clear and very noticeable improvements in term of overall operation and focus speed, colours, bokeh, sharpness and especially lowlight performance, thanks to f2.2, BSI and OIS. Although missing the extra settings in 808 (eg. ND, sharpness, saturation controls), 1020 still managed to produce higher percentage of sharp in-focus photos with good colors rendition for me than with 808.  For those who never bother doing any post-processing on desktop, Lumia 1020 photos is ideal as they can be used without much further tweaking with the higher saturation and sharpening compared to conservative 808. They might looks Samsungy oversaturated on screen because the default screen colour is boost up ala Xperia Bravia engine. On desktop, they just looks about right.
Will test night shots when I have the time soon.

Thoughts on WP8
This is my first WP experience and I have only one thing to say -  aesthetic and UX/UI-wise, it's at least 5-year ahead of iOS7. Love the minimalism, suits me as a designer perfectly. Despite the imperfection when comes to features and apps, the simplicity and typography win me over.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
nice, a very brief insight from a designer as well as 808 user, might want to "vsco-fy" your shots sir? whistling.gif

Keep them coming! notworthy.gif
lcy851031
post Oct 4 2013, 03:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
741 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(hox @ Oct 4 2013, 03:36 PM)
blurry because out of focus hehe

its actually both blurry of movement without OIS and out of focus due to failure to have proper focus lock.

btw, the super wide angle us really great for architecture and interior shots.

just found the setting to lower screen saturation, lowered 2 notches and the colors are more accurate now.
*
Take note that wide angle only works on 16:9 mode shot, but less pixel.

4:3 had more pixel but angle was less wide.
davidletterboyz
post Oct 4 2013, 03:59 PM

Der Kaiser
*******
Senior Member
4,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(hox @ Oct 4 2013, 03:36 PM)
blurry because out of focus hehe

its actually both blurry of movement without OIS and out of focus due to failure to have proper focus lock.

btw, the super wide angle us really great for architecture and interior shots.

just found the setting to lower screen saturation, lowered 2 notches and the colors are more accurate now.
*
Didn't notice that 1020PV's lens is wider by 2mm focal length.
BTW, do you still have your 808PV with you?
hox
post Oct 4 2013, 04:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
340 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(lcy851031 @ Oct 4 2013, 03:54 PM)
Take note that wide angle only works on 16:9 mode shot, but less pixel.

4:3 had more pixel but angle was less wide.
*
if your shots do require a wider angle, the 2MP diff is worth it as you'll be getting real wider angle, unlike every other smatphones out there that have 'fake' 16:9
hox
post Oct 4 2013, 04:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
340 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Oct 4 2013, 03:59 PM)
Didn't notice that 1020PV's lens is wider by 2mm focal length.
BTW, do you still have your 808PV with you?
*
suda lama jual boss biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by hox: Oct 4 2013, 04:08 PM
47ronin
post Oct 4 2013, 04:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
365 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(TongCN @ Sep 30 2013, 04:02 PM)
But I can see the quality of the photo will like downgrade after taking the shot.
Maybe like bit blur and color tone become warmer.

Doesn't feel like 34mp :\ was wondering do we need to access to computer then only can see 34mp ?
*
use HD Photo Viewer ---> http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/store/ap...f8-5c9e7597a2df


soneey
post Oct 4 2013, 05:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(hox @ Oct 4 2013, 03:03 PM)
more pics

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
the pictures are just... drool.gif

Zephyr_Mage
post Oct 4 2013, 05:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Validating
5,444 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Still no idea how to upload the full res photo to flickr easily. Any tips?
adam ultimo
post Oct 4 2013, 06:23 PM

Moon²
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: Sabah, North Borneo.


QUOTE(ikram_p @ Oct 4 2013, 05:51 AM)
hi, need help, where to buy screen protector in k.l..i also did not apply any sp yet  sweat.gif .. i thought only gorilla can scratch it.
*
hahaha. gorilla glass hence only gorilla can sratch it.. u r something else man.. anyway, i dont know where u can find the sp in kl cus im from sabah.. sorry about that.
hox
post Oct 4 2013, 06:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
340 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
The other great improvement over 808 is wide angle barrel distortion which is very bad with 808 for subjects like people at the edges of a shot. With the new 6 elements lense in 1020, almost all distortions are corrected despite the wider lense

example:

user posted image

This post has been edited by hox: Oct 4 2013, 07:58 PM
adam ultimo
post Oct 4 2013, 06:35 PM

Moon²
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: Sabah, North Borneo.


QUOTE(Zephyr_Mage @ Oct 4 2013, 08:06 AM)
Nope.

1. I couldn't find any from the stores.
2. The guy at the nokia store suggested that I didn't need one.

Fortunately it's barely noticeable but I'm pretty upset and pissed off. I didn't put it together with keys or anything. The only time it could come into contact with anything is when I get out of the car and I'm holding the phone and the keys together for a few seconds.

Gorilla glass 3 my ass.
*
i see.. at first i also didnt want to apply sp on my ex-920 but after i watch the review from pocketnow in the 'after the buzz' episode, where the reviewer showed what become of his so called gorilla glass on his 920 without any sp, it made me determined to put the sp to prevent the similar issue from happening to my phone.

anyway, if u dont want to add any more scratches i suggest u apply sp asap. can really rely on the gorilla glass.. it's just gimmick.

This post has been edited by adam ultimo: Oct 4 2013, 06:37 PM
ahnien
post Oct 4 2013, 06:52 PM

PanDA Enthusiast
*******
Senior Member
2,308 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


user posted image
ulwan25
post Oct 4 2013, 09:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,054 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Johor Bahru, Johor


QUOTE(hox @ Oct 4 2013, 04:03 PM)
more pics

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
"don't lie lie lah. dis dslr kan?" ~Samdung fans whistling.gif

123 Pages « < 36 37 38 39 40 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0208sec    0.85    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 11:15 PM