Cannot put real leather, it is torturing animal.

how much will qx10 and qx100 be?

qx100 is really tempting

No idea, this need ask the Sony designer.
Yalo, is not like we swim/throw the phone to water everyday. We not staying underwater.

Huh? You want to slide down using your RM2299 phone? 

I never do this lo. And never intend to. Hehe.

And holiday I still trust DSLR than mobile camera.

Even let said didn't bring DSLR, also don't think will snap pool or beach under water.

later phone slip and you crash into your own phone. 

I love my phone. Never gonna do that yo.

why you want to engage in anti-social activity during camping? 

ya ya ya.... u r right le.... how old r u by the way.... during my teenage camping time there is no such tablet  / phone that can watch movie ..... miss the old time... what we can do that time was only tell ghost story + watch star + play poker. during raining habis.....

Just download the photo full size and proper name for easier comparison - http://www.mediafire.com/?a338x3g8sadye6d

My comment

Outdoor (the best highlight in red)
iPhone - Still stay strong & good result.
HTC One - Far object details is gone, check the top left building rooftop.
LG G2 - Sharp in details but photo look a bit less color. The best output for me.
Lumia 925 - As usual, Nokia output color weird.
S4 - Clear but seems not enough contrast.
Z1 - Color quite similar with S4, but details is not there, a bit wax look.
Macro - (the best highlight in red) Frank speak the person don't have idea how to snap macro
iPhone - As usual look good.
HTC One - OMG! what happen to the eye! and color over vivid. Yark!
LG G2 - Sharp in details but look boring and dull due to colorless.
Lumia 925 - Err! the worst, the color like shit!
S4 - Sharp and Clear and better contrast.
Z1 - A bit less contrast, 2nd best after S4.

Low Light - (the best highlight in red)
iPhone - As usual look good. Eh! iPhone photo still good.
HTC One - The wording can't see in proper already, still among the most vivid.
LG G2 - Strong noise reduction is apply, a bit wax look.
Lumia 925 - Details control ok, but the color still... Nokia need to learn more on color.
S4 - Clear but a bit too bright and less contrast.
Z1 - I find this time finally Z1 given the best result, clear, and sharp in details.

Very Low Light - (the best highlight in red)
iPhone - Too much noise.
HTC One - Color is over saturation and blur.
LG G2 - Strong noise reduction is apply, a bit wax look.
Lumia 925 - Details control ok, but the color still... Nokia need to learn more on color.
S4 - A bit noise and darker.
Z1 - 2nd time Z1 given the best result, clear, and sharp in details.
Conclusion:
The Best Camera - LG G2
The Best Night Shoot Camera - Sony Xperia Z1
The Worst Camera - Nokia Lumia 925
2nd Worst Camera - HTC One
Balance in between Camera - S4
Still Strong & Good Result - Apple iPhone 5
* The test will be much complete if include also latest Samsung Galaxy Note 3 & Nokia Lumia 1020, the Best might shift place in this case.

he is comparing based on this la http://www.xperiablog.net/2013/09/09/xperi...-s4/#more-17525

No all people like screen protector. Me hate it. That shatter "shit" force me using it.

Anyway soon I believe I can release from nightmare. I hate screen protector.

Same brand, XZU -> RM2,299 3G version only. LTE version maybe will higher.

*one more note, wondering if Malaysia has Samsung hired bashing boy like oversea, heheheheh. 

Here's the more accurate date:
Xperia Arc - January, first released in March
Xperia Arc S - August, first released in September
Xperia S - 9 January, first released in March
Xperia T - 29 August, first released in October
Xperia Z - 8 January, first released in March
Xperia Z1 - 4 September, going to be first released in September

According to one girl name Erica Griffin (you can google her up. her reviews and explanations on details are really based on her on research and measrements and not from internet available information)

Right, according to her, AMOLED actually has more accurate colour gamut compared to IPS screen

What happened in previous Galaxy phones was that Samsung had deliberately oversaturated the colours. So when people say Galaxy S3 is oversaturated, they're right, but it's not AMOLED's fault, it's the software's fault.

But since Galaxy S4, Samsung had leave the colour meters "more natural" on the colour gamut, according to the results of the colour meter measurements done by her.

Now, on the LCD, the colour gamut is actually narrower than the colour gamut on AMOLED (the wider the colour gamut, the more accurate the colour is according to true colours that human eyes can see). If LCD on natural colour meter mode were to put side by side to AMOLED, it will look as if LCD is undersaturated.

So what most manufacturers do was, they try to emulate AMOLED screen by oversaturating the colours! This is done by deliberately adjusting the colour meters to a more saturated ones (LG G2 according to her colour meter measurements), or by deliberately adjusting the gamma output put make it more saturated (HTC One and Z Ultra). Oversaturating means no more accurate colours, because at some more you will see too dark, and some part you will see too bright compared to the original colour.

So actually what we consumers see as "Good Colour Quality" is actually over saturation of colours, except Galaxy S4 and Note 3 and perhaps newer Galaxy series. Manufacturers found out we actually like oversaturated colours. We can say we like more natural colours but the moment we like what Triluminus or HTC One display, that's actually over saturated colours.

But the downside of AMOLED is that it's not suitable for heavy users, as the screen will degrade overtime due to how the sub pixel works and it's not preventable, according to her.