QUOTE(1setsuna1 @ Aug 30 2013, 10:55 PM)
wrong quote izit bro?


nevermind.
Irrespective of whether the plan is whole life, term, ILP or whatever name they call it, whenever there is a word insurance it means "to insure", ie to provide financial protection, should there a need to.
In order for the insurer to provide coverage to the policy holder, the premiums paid will be used to offset the insurance charges. Insurance comes with insurance charges, fund management charges (if ILP), policy charge, admin charges, and not forgetting the agent commission (for 6 years).
Insurance as you may know is a business of risk transference, the more risk that are being transferred to the insurer the higher the insurance charges it will be. As we grow older, the insurance charges will be higher because the likelihood of a claim will be higher.
This is also the reason why insurance charges may costs tripple or even quadraple when we are age above 60 as compared to when we are in our 30s.
Yes as some poster had said, listening to the needs of the client and look at their affordability is vital as there is no point to get a policy and lapse it prematurely.
Giving a baby Rm1 million cover is total nonsense as the baby has no economic worth, nor is the baby is responsible to us adults. Unless of course you want to earn money from the insurance money by murdering the baby?
Anyway, it is rather impossible to get a baby covered for Rm1m, as most insurer will reject it as there is no justification as explained above. Also not forgetting that Juvenile lien applies for new born babies whereby for the 1st year, only 20% of the sum insured is payable.
When it comes to the so call savings plans, basically there are two types, endownment and ILP. ILP is subjected to investment risk as mentioned clearly in the quotation.
Whenever an agent does the savings plan in ILP, BUT allocates the premium MORE towards PROTECTION (ie buying high cover), it means higher insurance charges will be used based on the given premium.
This means there will be lesser premium will be allocated to buy you units, and that defeats the purpose of of the so call savings plans. Why does an agent swing your premium more towards insurance and not savings you may ask? It is because for for the investment portion, 95% of the premium is allocated to buy you units.
With such a high allocation, agent commission will be less, 3% to be exact.
The first 7 years whenever starting a policy are mostly allocated to those charges mentioned above. The first year allocated premium to buy units is 40% and gradually increase till 100% on the 7th years onwards. Look at the brochure or full quotation on these allocation rates
The allocation rate for plans may vary depending on the type of product. The higher the allocation rate, the better for the client.
However the charges still exists, hence it will take longer time in order for the client to even see the breakeven.
Having said that, even if it the premium is directed to investment, there were significant market crashed in 97, 2008. That means in between these years in fact if we are purposely buying funds when the market is on the high, we are in fact buying lesser units.
This is when agents will then talk about dollar cost averaging to make you more confuse.
This post has been edited by roystevenung: Aug 31 2013, 12:12 AM